The diversity and intensity of human activities in the North Sea region (NSR) and other maritime regions are increasing. This necessitates transboundary coordination at the sea basin level, which is required but yet insufficiently established. Through European co-funded projects, national policymakers, stakeholders, and scientists in MSP are enabled to develop transboundary coordination (TBC) mechanisms. TBC requires, alongside other factors, a form of social and policy learning between these actors in different countries. The NorthSEE project (2016–2022) was an example of such an EU-co-funded project and was aimed at enhancing coherence in MSP processes and plans across the NSR. This article examines the project's key learning outcomes, the role of the MSP Challenge Simulation Platform in supporting these outcomes, and factors that enabled or constrained learning within the project. Data was collected during the project via document analysis, questionnaires from participatory stakeholder workshops, interviews with sixteen project participants and ten workshop participants, and observations. The study highlights that project participants have gained more insight into each other's planning systems, are able to contact each other more easily, and have initiated several follow-up initiatives. Furthermore, it shows that interactive and participatory tools, such as the MSP Challenge Simulation Platform, can contribute to individual and social learning by providing participants with instant feedback on their decisions. These learning outcomes have been influenced by various enabling and constraining conditions, including time, resources, and the differing levels of expertise and knowledge among project partners and participants. Assessing the broader societal impact remains a challenge and warrants further attention.
MULTIFILE
In a study commissioned by the Association of Dutch Municipalities (VNG), the applied research group European Impact has compiled the results from interviews executed by approximately 240 European Studies students at The Hague University of Applied Sciences. The purpose of this report is to compare and contrast the situation of intra-EU labor migrants (hereafter referred to as EU mobile citizens) in regard to registration, housing, and information flows in 12 different municipalities across the EU. Based on semi-structured interviews with municipal workers and individuals from employment agencies/companies from the selected municipalities, the picture that emerges is one of divergence. There are significant variations regarding the registration procedure and information flows for EU mobile citizens across the selected municipalities. For registration, differences include where the registration takes place, the amount of collaboration between municipalities and employment agencies/companies on registering EU mobile citizens, and the importance of addresses in the registration process. Regarding information flows across the selected municipalities, there are significant variations in the amount and type of information available to EU mobile citizens, the number of languages information is available in,as well as how the information is organized (i.e. in a centralized or decentralized way). Furthermore, while all the member states in which the selected municipalities are located provide information regarding registration on the Single Digital Gateway, not all provide information about renting housing. As for housing, the results revealed that most of the selected municipalities face issues with housing and that EU mobile citizens typically find housing either via their employers or personal network. Based on the results, a list of potential best practices and policy areas that could be improved was compiled. Furthermore, in order to have a stronger overview of policy developments in the field of EU mobile citizens among different municipalities, the VNG could consider hosting a Community of Practice with different municipalities across the EU as well as monitoring Interreg Europe projects focused on improving the situation of EU mobile citizens.
DOCUMENT
Video explaining the setup and results of the EU Interreg North Sea Region project entitled NorthSEE (2016-2021).
YOUTUBE
This report uses experience gained during the EU Interreg IVB project ITRACT and shares transnational learning on how to deploy IT-based solutions as part of Smart Specialisation Strategies, for example, while creating answers to societal challenges. ITRACT concentrates on rural areas, where the availability of an adequate digital infrastructure is often lacking and where people may lack the digital skills and literacy to adopt the smart solutions (known as Intelligent Transport Services; ITS) offered. The project addresses transport services as an enabler for smart specialisation.
DOCUMENT
The SEEV4-City project, funded by the EU Interreg NSR Programme, aims to demonstrate electric mobility solutions, integrate renewable energy and encourage uptake in cities. Six Operational Pilots in four countries implement different levels of Smart Charging and V2X technology. The variation and complexity of the different OPs provide a number of valuable Lessons Learnt. Through a questionnaire and interviews, OP inputs and experiences were documented, and analysed. Key conclusions: V2X setups need to be tailor-made by unifying existing, yet not readily compatible components; it pays to know the V2X market; and there is no single, generic, universally-applicable V2X business model.
DOCUMENT
In het meerlagige bestuur van de Europese Unie (EU) hebben gemeenten veel te maken met fondsen, wetgeving, beleidskaders en netwerken. Hetzelfde geldt voor provincies; een bestuursniveau hoger. Wat is de verhouding tussen EU, provincies en gemeenten en hoe zijn deze met elkaar verbonden? En specifiek: Hoe ondersteunen de twaalf provincies de gemeenten in hun regio als het gaat om hun verhouding tot de Europese Unie (EU)? Dit is de centrale vraag van het onderzoek dat in dit rapport wordt gepresenteerd. Dit onderzoek vond plaats in het kader van een verkenning door het lectoraat European Impact van De Haagse Hogeschool in samenwerking met Platform31, de Vereniging Nederlandse Gemeenten (VNG) en Kenniscentrum Europa Decentraal (KED), over de manier waarop de Nederlandse medeoverheden kunnen worden geëquipeerd met de kennis en kunde om effectief Europese kansen te verzilveren. Het doel is om de Nederlandse gemeenten, provincies en waterschappen van praktische handvatten te voorzien. De bevindingen van dit rapport zijn gebaseerd op interviews met EU-contactpersonen in alle twaalf Nederlandse provincies, aangevuld met deskresearch. Daarbij is gebruik gemaakt van EU-gerelateerde informatie die door elke provincie op haar website is gepubliceerd. Verschillende gesprekspartners toonden interesse in de resultaten van dit onderzoek. Zo verklaarde een geïnterviewde EU-coördinator: "We willen graag de resultaten van dit onderzoek delen, niet alleen omdat het ons een spiegel voorhoudt en inzicht geeft in onze eigen praktijken, maar ook om te ontdekken wat anderen doen en van elkaar te leren." We komen aan deze wens graag tegemoet met dit beknopte verslag. Na deze inleiding geeft dit rapport een beknopt overzicht van de institutionele verhoudingen tussen provincies en gemeentes en vormen van ondersteuning om onze onderzoeksvragen toe te lichten (Hoofdstuk 2). Op basis van de methodologie voor deze verkenning (Hoofdstuk 3) presenteren we een overzicht van relevante bevindingen per provincie (Hoofdstuk 4). De kern van het rapport voor de praktijk zijn de analyse, gebaseerd op de onderlinge vergelijking van provinciale praktijk, en onze hoofdconclusies (Hoofdstuk 5).
DOCUMENT
Dit boekje gaat over het lectoraat Groene Leefomgeving van Steden aan Hogeschool VHL van lector Wim Timmermans. In hoofdstuk 2 wordt een korte, chronologische geschiedenis verteld van het lectoraat, van de eerste kennismakingsgesprekken en experimenten met studentencharettes, via de formulering van de eerste werkfilosofie naar een steeds strakker in elkaar stekend programma om praktijkgericht onderwijs en onderzoek te verenigen. In hoofdstuk 3 wordt via vijf thematische stapstenen als het ware door die geschiedenis heen en weer gehinkeld. Uit het project Jonge Friezen Foarút bleek hoe studenten ingezet kunnen worden als interventiemacht. In Amersfoort leidde praktijkgericht onderzoek ertoe dat de major Management Buitenruimte een andere invulling kreeg. In het Europese project VALUE-Added werden studentencharettes gebruikt voor evaluatie van studentencharettes. Experimentele projecten uit het Kennisverspreiding en Innovatie Groen Onderwijs (KIGO) project rondom eco-engineering zorgden ervoor dat docenten en studenten samen met kunstenaars en technici voorbij de grenzen van hun vakmatige disciplines werkten. Als afsluiting van het boek wordt ingegaan op de managementstijl van Timmermans, die het best omschreven kan worden als quiet leadership.
DOCUMENT
Presentatie van rapport over: 'Groene Hart Werkt! door kennis en kunde'. Inventariseer de behoefte en wijze waarop de Groene Hart Academie verduurzaamd kan worden en werk een businessplan en actieplan uit zodat de leden van de bestuurlijke tafel Groene Hart Werkt! zich een beeld kunnen vormen over de kansen van een doorstart en de toekomstige positie van de Groene Hart Academie zodat zij haar rol kan blijven vervullen en nieuwe projecten kan blijven aanjagen en uitvoeren.
DOCUMENT
Living labs are complex multi-stakeholder collaborations that often employ a usercentred and design-driven methodology to foster innovation. Conventional management tools fall short in evaluating them. However, some methods and tools dedicated to living labs' special characteristics and goals have already been developed. Most of them are still in their testing phase. Those tools are not easily accessible and can only be found in extensive research reports, which are difficult to dissect. Therefore, this paper reviews seven evaluation methods and tools specially developed for living labs. Each section of this paper is structured in the following manner: tool’s introduction (1), who uses the tool (2), and how it should be used (3). While the first set of tools, namely “ENoLL 20 Indicators”, “SISCODE Self-assessment”, and “SCIROCCO Exchange Tool” assess a living lab as an organisation and are diving deeper into the organisational activities and the complex context, the second set of methods and tools, “FormIT” and “Living Lab Markers”, evaluate living labs’ methodologies: the process they use to come to innovations. The paper's final section presents “CheRRIes Monitoring and Evaluation Tool” and “TALIA Indicator for Benchmarking Service for Regions”, which assess the regional impact made by living labs. As every living lab is different regarding its maturity (as an organisation and in its methodology) and the scope of impact it wants to make, the most crucial decision when evaluating is to determine the focus of the assessment. This overview allows for a first orientation on worked-out methods and on possible indicators to use. It also concludes that the existing tools are quite managerial in their method and aesthetics and calls for designers and social scientists to develop more playful, engaging and (possibly) learning-oriented tools to evaluate living labs in the future. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/overdiek12345/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/mari-genova-17a727196/?originalSubdomain=nl
DOCUMENT
Peatlands can be found in almost every country in the world, but we areonly just starting to realise their value and how to harness their potential asa powerhouse nature-based solution. The more we learn about peatlands,the more we value the important services they provide - controllingfloods, purifying and supplying water, safeguarding species,harbouring deep cultural meaning, inspiring creativity and offeringlivelihoods to millions of people. We cannot afford to lose them or abusethem. A lack of understanding of peatlands’ vital role in the landscape, combined with outdated policies and perverse incentives, means that peatlands continue to be drained and damaged around the world. Peatlands are our largest terrestrial organic carbon stock, and if we are to meet ourglobal goals and commitments, we must work hard to understand,protect, restore, and sustainably manage these vital ecosystems. This Peatlands Across Europe: Innovation & Inspiration Guide is a valuable step towards that reality – it captures important recommendations, shares the cutting edge experiences of peatland restoration pioneers, and identifies gaps, priorities and lessons from across Europe that can be taken up by peatland practitioners around the globe.
DOCUMENT
