Supply chain partnerships within housing refurbishment have not been given much specific attention which may be found surprising because the refurbishment market is becoming of increasing importance compared to new construction and has specific characteristics that require adapted approaches to supply chain integration. In this paper approaches, expected benefits and challenges of supply chain partnerships within housing renovation are explored. From general literature on building process innovation, dimensions of supply chain integration and potential advantages and challenges of have been derived and employed in a preliminary inquiry among Dutch housing associations and their partners that are experimenting with supply chain partnering in housing refurbishment projects. The results indicate that approaches are in a relatively early stage of development towards ‘mature’ supply chain partnerships. Furthermore, many of the general expectations also apply to the Dutch housing refurbishment sector, but at a more detailed level, refurbishment may require specific attention for the division of tasks and risks between the partners, particularly regarding communication with tenants.
Senior co-housing communities offer an in-between solution for older people who do not want to live in an institutional setting but prefer the company of their age peers. Residents of co-housing communities live in their own apartments but undertake activities together and support one another. This paper adds to the literature by scrutinizing the benefits and drawbacks of senior co-housing, with special focus on the forms and limits of social support and the implications for the experience of loneliness. Qualitative fieldwork was conducted in eight co-housing communities in the Netherlands, consisting of document analysis, interviews, focus groups, and observations. The research shows that co-housing communities offer social contacts, social control, and instrumental and emotional support. Residents set boundaries regarding the frequency and intensity of support. The provided support partly relieves residents’ adult children from caregiving duties but does not substitute formal and informal care. Due to their access to contacts and support, few residents experience social loneliness. Co-housing communities can potentially also alleviate emotional loneliness, but currently, this happens to a limited degree. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for enhancing the benefits and reducing the drawbacks of senior co-housing. Original article at MDPI; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193776
MULTIFILE
Since the financial and administrative liberalisation from the government in the late 1980s and the 1990s, the Dutch housing associations have been very dynamic, regarding the considerable extension of both commercial and social activities, the increased reliance and dependence on market circumstances, and the large number of amalgamations, creating bigger organisations. In recent years the Dutch social housing sector is under increased pressure as a consequence of the credit crunch, increased tax levies and the national implementation in the sector of EU regulations on ‘Services of General Economic Interest’. Factors like these are likely to have an effect on the organisational strategies of housing associations, the main providers of social housing in the Netherlands. The direction and the size of these effects, however, are not well known. A recent inquiry among housing associations sheds more light on this. In this paper, we make use of a classification including a socialcommercial dimension and a dimension between so-called ‘prospectors’ and ‘defenders’. This classification proves to be an adequate tool to describe the recent developments in the sector. It is concluded that, in general, housing associations are focussing more on traditional social housing tasks and ‘defending’ strategies, implying a shift back compared to the trend in recent decades.
Het ‘Living Lab, Eerst een Thuis’ van gemeente Utrecht en regiogemeenten geeft dakloze mensen directe toegang tot stabiele huisvesting met ambulante begeleiding. De Hogeschool Utrecht voert actieonderzoek uit. We achterhalen kritische succes- en faalfactoren bij huisvesting, begeleiding en landen in de wijk en zorgen ervoor dat we tussentijds samen kunnen leren en experimenteren. Doel Door dit project krijgen we inzicht in wat werkt bij het huisvesten, begeleiden en helpen landen in de wijk van dakloze mensen. Daarmee willen we de kans op duurzaam herstel van de bewoners vergroten. Leergang Housing First Housing First is bekend als model en systeemaanpak voor het beëindigen van dakloosheid. Wil je weten waar dit precies over gaat? Ben je benieuwd naar wat er bij de implementatie en doorontwikkeling komt kijken? Wil jij met Housing First een effectieve bijdrage leveren aan het beëindigen van dakloosheid? Meld je dan aan voor onze nieuwe Leergang Housing First die in januari '23 van start gaat en wordt verzorgd door Housing First Nederland en Hogeschool Utrecht. Resultaten Inzicht in de kritische succes- en faalfactoren op de thema’s begeleiding, huisvesting en landen in de wijk; Het vergroten van de kans op duurzaam herstel van mensen die na een periode van dakloosheid weer zelfstandig gaan wonen. Looptijd 01 april 2021 - 31 augustus 2023 Aanpak We organiseren groepssessies met bewoners, begeleiders en ketenpartners bij de verschillende projecten die onder het Living Lab vallen. Daarbij kijken wat goed gaat en wat beter kan en vertalen we de opgehaalde informatie naar interventies of actiepunten.
In opdracht van sociale onderneming Jimmy's voert het lectoraat Vastgoed een haalbaarheidsonderzoek uit naar 'Jimmy's geeft Thuis'; een nieuw woonconcept voor kwetsbare jongeren. Het onderzoek wordt mede mogelijk gemaakt door het Kansfonds.
Wonen Eerst, zo heet de nieuwe aanpak van dakloosheid die Nederland in 2022 in een Nationaal Actieplan vastlegde. Deze systeemaanpak, gebaseerd op de beginselen van Housing First, beoogt het duurzaam beëindigen van dakloosheid door onder meer passende huisvesting te voorzien. Dit project onderzoekt op welke manier de transitie van opvang naar Wonen Eerst vorm krijgt in Nederland. We richten ons vooral op initiatieven die passende huisvesting trachten te voorzien voor diverse groepen: welke uitkomsten behalen zij? Welke belemmeringen ervaren zij? En wat kan daaraan gedaan worden?
