Zoekresultaten

Critical success factors of Lean in Higher Education: an international perspective.

Purpose: Continuous improvement initiatives such as Lean in Higher Education (HE) institutes are an emerging topic for research. Under pressure to do more with less, institutes of HE are increasingly adopting the tools and methods of lean to improve their quality practices. Nevertheless, institutes of HE differ significantly from business organizations. The purpose of this study was to examine the critical success factors (CSFs) of continuous improvement in this homogeneous industry. Two other contextual factors, implementation approach and national culture, are examined. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed methods approach, combining Q-methodology, online surveys and interviews, was used to investigate the CSFs of lean implementation in HE. Participants were recruited from an international network of lean practitioners in HE. Using Q-methodology, three perspectives of CSFs in HE were identified. Findings: Lean implementation at institutes of HE is characterized by a bottom-up approach, involving mostly supporting processes. Contrary to business organizations, the role of management in the implementation of Lean in HE is limited and attention should instead be directed to employee empowerment and customer focus. The findings also showed that, at least for institutes of HE, organizational culture is more influential than national culture. Practical implications: When management involvement is limited, a bottom-up implementation of lean is recommended, centered on improving university-wide supporting processes, promoting cross-departmental cooperation and overcoming the silo mentality. This approach requires an emphasis on a specific set of CSFs, namely, employee empowerment, sharing success stories and training. Originality/value: The study findings enrich conceptually based lean implementation frameworks for HE that advocate a top-down implementation approach.

Lowlands sociotechnical design theory and lean production

Lean Production (LP) can be regarded as a design approach in search of a theoretical foundation. In this paper we show that Lowlands’ Sociotechnical Design Theory (STSL) could function as such a foundation. To reach this goal, we first describe STSL as a system theoretical reformulation of Original Sociotechnical Theory (OSTS). Then, we introduce the Toyota Production System as the origin of LP and the challenge it poses for the academic field of organization design. This academic field should (1) assess LP’s success, (2) generalize it by embedding it in more abstract concepts and theories in order to be able to (3) re-specify it for different manufacturing and non-manufacturing contexts. Next, we give an exposition of STSL as a structural design approach based on developments in system theory. At last, we reformulate lean production in STSL terms and so show that LP is a subcase within the more general theory of STSL. We discuss the merits of both approaches and clarify some misunderstandings of lean both outside and inside the lean community. Embedding LP in the more general language of STSL should enable us to discover similarities and differences, to start a process of mutual learning, to integrate diverse design approaches in a theory of organizational design and to add content to redesign proposals of for example the health care system as proposed by Porter and Teisberg (2006) and Christensen et al. (2009). We quote extensively from the lean literature (to convince our sociotechnical friends) and embed both STSL and LP in the broader literature on organization design. We hope this adds a new perspective to the one given in the Operations Management literature on LP. Again, mutual learning is the goal.

Navigating efficiency and inclusion: adapting lean practices and 5S for social enterprises through action research.

Social Enterprises face a significant challenge in improving their competitiveness without sacrificing their social objectives. Using an action research approach, we examine how the lean management tool 5S can be modified to fit the characteristics of the vulnerable workers involved in their operational processes. While 5S is typically applied to achieve efficiency, we find that the most important benefits of implementation for social enterprises are improvements in self-efficacy, ownership, and responsibility of the vulnerable workers. Other benefits were increased reliance on visual cues and reduced search time. Implementation of 5S highlighted the negative impact of circularity practices on operational efficiency.

De moderne sociotechniek als theoretische onderbouwing van Lean

Lean is een ontwerptheorie op zoek naar een theoretische onderbouwing. In deze bijdrage laat de auteur zien dat de Moderne Sociotechniek (MST), zoals ontwikkeld door Ulbo de Sitter, kan dienen als een dergelijke theoretische onderbouwing. De overeenkomsten zijn dus groter dan menigeen, inclusief De Sitter zelf, denkt. Daarnaast wijst hij ook op verschillen. Zo is het de verdienste van De Sitter, dat hij het vraagstuk van de lerende organisatie als een structuurvraagstuk geherformuleerd heeft. En het is de verdienste van Lean dat ze de rol van standaarden en routines in dit leerproces geherwaardeerd heeft.

Empowering social enterprises: an industry-university collaboration to amplify impact through lean management.

Botsende waardes in en rond publieke organisaties

De focus binnen het lectoraat is gericht op botsende waarden. Publieke organisaties onderscheiden zich op vele punten van private organisaties en hebben unieke publieke waarden. In vele westerse en niet westerse landen zien wij New Public Management opkomen. De kern van deze benadering is dat de verschillen tussen publieke en private organisaties helemaal niet zo groot zijn en dat publieke organisaties kunnen leren van het bedrijfsleven. In het onderzoek van het lectoraat wordt, aan de hand van het thema prestatiemeting, nagegaan in hoeverre er sprake is van botsende waarden, hoe deze botsing tot uitdrukking komt en welke alternatieven er zijn. Het onderzoek van het lectoraat richt zich vooral op prestatiemeting in de publieke sector, waarbij prestatiemeting zowel wordt beschouwd op het niveau van de individuele werknemer als op het niveau van de publieke organisatie als geheel.