In the Netherlands, a new research role was introduced in higher professional education. In our lectureship participants improve their practices and generate knowledge as action researchers. We started our own action research to better help them. Our question is: how can we help our researchers develop their research identity as part of their professional development and so help them improve their innovation practice? Reflecting on our findings so far, we notice a pedagogy of increasing structure. We believe a research identity involves more than techniques; a research culture (and especially ethics) must be developed if research is to become a tradition.
Het Studentsucces Centrum kan voor studenten een belangrijke plek zijn waar binding tussen studenten in een informele setting centraal staat. Sociale activiteiten zorgen er hierbij voor dat studenten niet alleen in sociaal opzicht meer geïntegreerd raken, maar maken tevens belangrijke netwerken voor hen toegankelijk. Op deze manier kan het Studentsucces Centrum studenten toegang geven tot meer sociaal kapitaal en sociale steun. Deze kunnen hen helpen bepaalde doelen te behalen en zorgen voor meer succeservaringen en gevoel van competentie. In dit rapport adviseren we over randvoorwaarden die volgens de empowermentvisie nodig zijn voor het vormen van een inclusieve gemeenschap.
When the Netherlands developed a national system of vocational education at the end of the 19th century, it was a direct answer to obvious shortcomings in the technical and trade professions (De Jonge, 1968). It concentrated on training craftsmen for the traditional, mainly agrarian economy, and technicians for the new, industrial economy. The training being offered was closely related to actual professional practices. In the first place, there was a very stable occupational structure, in which professional knowledge and skills did not become obsolete quickly. This, in turn, made it possible that education was -and remained - up-to-date. Secondly, almost all teachers were also experienced craftsmen, who only started teaching after a long career. The teachers learned actual professional practices through direct experience. In addition, students were also frequently familiar with actual practice, because the occupational structure was so stable: they knew exactly for which profession they were being trained. A stable occupational structure, a clear occupational orientation by the students, and teachers with extensive firsthand work experience ensured that vocational education was a powerful learning environment. For this reason, a dual system had hardly any added value. A consequence is that the apprenticeship system in the Netherlands - as opposed to almost all surrounding countries - had a lower status and fewer students than full-time education (Teerling & Bijveld, 1982).
