As a consequence of climate change and urbanization, many cities will have to deal with more flooding and extreme heat stress. This paper presents a framework to maximize the effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) for flood risk reduction and thermal comfort enhancement. The framework involves an assessment of hazards with the use of models and field measurements. It also detects suitable implementation sites for NBS and quantifies their effectiveness for thermal comfort enhancement and flood risk reduction. The framework was applied in a densely urbanized study area, for which different small-scale urban NBS and their potential locations for implementation were assessed. The overall results show that the most effective performance in terms of flood mitigation and thermal comfort enhancement is likely achieved by applying a range of different measures at different locations. Therefore, the work presented here shows the potential of the framework to achieve an effective combination of measures and their locations, which was demonstrated on the case of the Sukhumvit area in Bangkok (Thailand). This can be particularly suitable for assessing and planning flood mitigation measures in combination with heat stress reduction.
In the debate about smart cities, an alternative to a dominant top-down, tech-driven solutionist approach has arisen in examples of ‘civic hacking’. Hacking here refers to the playful, exploratory, collaborative and sometimes transgressive modes of operation found in various hacker cultures, this time constructively applied in the context of civics. It suggests a novel logic to organise urban society through social and digital media platforms, moving away from centralised urban planning towards a more inclusive process of city-making, creating new types of public spaces. This book takes this urban imaginary of a hackable city seriously, using hacking as a lens to explore examples of collaborative city-making enabled by digital media technologies. Five different perspectives are discussed. Hacking can be understood as (1) an ethos, a particular articulation of citizenship in the network era; (2) as a set of iterative and collaborative city-making practices, bringing out new roles and relations between citizens, (design) professionals and institutional actors; (3) a set of affordances of institutional structures that allow or discourage their appropriation; (4) a critical lens to bring in notions of democratic governance, power struggles and conflict of interests into the debate on collaborative city-making; and (5) a point of departure for action research. After a discussion of these themes, the various chapters in the book are briefly introduced. Taken together they contribute to a wider debate about practices of technology-enabled collaborative city-making, and the question how city hacking may mature from the tactical level of smart and often playful interventions to a strategic level of enduring impact.
Hoe zorg je in Amsterdam voor een aantrekkelijk en gevarieerd winkelgebied waar zowel bewoners, bezoekers en ondernemers zich thuis voelen? Hoe komen deze verschillende belanghebbenden tot een goed functionerend, gezamenlijk beheer van winkelgebieden als een gemeenschappelijke bron met verschillende functies? Wat vraagt dit van de gemeente, hoe is haar rol daarin veranderd en hoe zien we dit terug in beleid? Actuele vragen, die al geruime tijd de gemoederen in Amsterdam flink bezighouden, en die we beantwoorden in het rapport 'De Winkelstraat als wereld’.Dit rapport is uitkomst van het vierjarig praktijkonderzoek Toekomstbestendig Evenwicht: Balanceren tussen divergerende belangen (RAAK-PRO). In dit rapport geven we antwoord op de hoofdvraag: welke interventies, processen en structuren faciliteren 'urban commoning', om te komen tot een meer gebalanceerde ontwikkeling van stedelijke consumptieruimten? Urban commoning is een gedeelde praktijk waarbij belanghebbende rondom een gemeenschappelijke bron samen regels en afspraken ontwikkelen om zo'n plek duurzaam te benutten.
MULTIFILE