BACKGROUND: Findings on the association between early high protein provision and mortality in ICU patients are inconsistent. The relation between early high protein provision and mortality in patients receiving CRRT remains unclear. The aim was to study the association between early high protein provision and hospital and ICU mortality and consistency in subgroups.METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2618 ICU patients with a feeding tube and mechanically ventilated ≥48 h (2003-2016). The association between early high protein provision (≥1.2 g/kg/day at day 4 vs. <1.2 g/kg/day) and hospital and ICU mortality was assessed for the total group, for patients receiving CRRT, and for non-septic and septic patients, by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Adjustments were made for APACHE II score, energy provision, BMI, and age.RESULTS: Mean protein provision at day 4 was 0.96 ± 0.48 g/kg/day. A significant association between early high protein provision and lower hospital mortality was found in the total group (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.60, p = <0.001), CRRT-receiving patients (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, p = 0.045) and non-septic patients (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, p = <0.001). However, no association was found in septic patients (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.29, p = 0.264). These associations were very similar for ICU mortality. In a sensitivity analysis for patients receiving a relative energy provision >50%, results remained robust in all groups except for patients receiving CRRT.CONCLUSIONS: Early high protein provision is associated with lower hospital and ICU mortality in ICU patients, including CRRT-receiving patients. There was no association for septic patients.
From an evidence-based perspective, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a well-supported assessment technique in both the United States (US) and Europe. The combination of standard exercise testing (ET) [i.e. progressive exercise provocation in association with serial electrocardiograms (ECGs), haemodynamics, oxygen saturation, and subjective symptoms] and measurement of ventilatory gas exchange amounts to a superior method to: (i) accurately quantify cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), (ii) delineate the physiologic system(s) underlying exercise responses, which can be applied as a means to identify the exercise-limiting pathophysiological mechanism(s) and/or performance differences, and (iii) formulate function-based prognostic stratification. Cardiopulmonary ET certainly carries an additional cost as well as competency requirements and is not an essential component of evaluation in all patient populations. However, there are several conditions of confirmed, suspected, or unknown aetiology where the data gained from this form of ET is highly valuable in terms of clinical decision making.1
From an evidence-based perspective, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a well-supported assessment technique in both the United States (US) and Europe. The combination of standard exercise testing (ET) (ie, progressive exercise provocation in association with serial electrocardiograms [ECG], hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, and subjective symptoms) and measurement of ventilatory gas exchange amounts to a superior method to: 1) accurately quantify cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), 2) delineate the physiologic system(s) underlying exercise responses, which can be applied as a means to identify the exercise-limiting pathophysiologic mechanism(s) and/or performance differences, and 3) formulate function-based prognostic stratification. Cardiopulmonary ET certainly carries an additional cost as well as competency requirements and is not an essential component of evaluation in all patient populations. However, there are several conditions of confirmed, suspected, or unknown etiology where the data gained from this form of ET is highly valuable in terms of clinical decision making
