Although reengineering is strategically advantageous fororganisations in order to keep functional and sustainable, safety must remain apriority and respective efforts need to be maintained. This paper suggeststhe combination of soft system methodology (SSM) and Pareto analysison the scope of safety management performance evaluation, and presents theresults of a survey, which was conducted in order to assess the effectiveness,efficacy and ethicality of the individual components of an organisation’s safetyprogram. The research employed quantitative and qualitative data and ensureda broad representation of functional managers and safety professionals, whocollectively hold the responsibility for planning, implementing and monitoringsafety practices. The results showed that SSM can support the assessment ofsafety management performance by revealing weaknesses of safety initiatives,and Pareto analysis can underwrite the prioritisation of the remedies required.The specific methodology might be adapted by any organisation that requires adeep evaluation of its safety management performance, seeks to uncover themechanisms that affect such performance, and, under limited resources, needsto focus on the most influential deficiencies.
Background: The emphasis on impact factors and the quantity of publications intensifies competition between researchers. This competition was traditionally considered an incentive to produce high-quality work, but there are unwanted side-effects of this competition like publication pressure. To measure the effect of publication pressure on researchers, the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) was developed. Upon using the PPQ, some issues came to light that motivated a revision.Method: We constructed two new subscales based on work stress models using the facet method. We administered the revised PPQ (PPQr) to a convenience sample together with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ). To assess which items best measured publication pressure, we carried out a principal component analysis (PCA). Reliability was sufficient when Cronbach's alpha > 0.7. Finally, we administered the PPQr in a larger, independent sample of researchers to check the reliability of the revised version.Results: Three components were identified as 'stress', 'attitude', and 'resources'. We selected 3 × 6 = 18 items with high loadings in the three-component solution. Based on the convenience sample, Cronbach's alphas were 0.83 for stress, 0.80 for attitude, and 0.76 for resources. We checked the validity of the PPQr by inspecting the correlations with the MBI and the WDQ. Stress correlated 0.62 with MBI's emotional exhaustion. Resources correlated 0.50 with relevant WDQ subscales. To assess the internal structure of the PPQr in the independent reliability sample, we conducted the principal component analysis. The three-component solution explains 50% of the variance. Cronbach's alphas were 0.80, 0.78, and 0.75 for stress, attitude, and resources, respectively.Conclusion: We conclude that the PPQr is a valid and reliable instrument to measure publication pressure in academic researchers from all disciplinary fields. The PPQr strongly relates to burnout and could also be beneficial for policy makers and research institutions to assess the degree of publication pressure in their institute.
Hoger onderwijsinstellingen investeren vaak fors in studentenmobiliteit en andere internationaliseringsactiviteiten die de ontwikkeling van interculturele competenties bij studenten moeten bevorderen. De verwachte meerwaarde van zulke projecten wordt vooral uitgedrukt in termen van carrièreperspectief, waarin interculturele competenties een centrale component vormen. Wat in veel internationaliseringsprojecten echter niet gebeurt, is nagaan in welke mate deze projecten ook echt het gewenste effect opleveren op de houding en het gedrag van de studenten. Vooral internationaliseringservaringen in verre bestemmingen vergen een substantiële investering van student en instelling, terwijl niet helemaal duidelijk is of studenten hierdoor ook daadwerkelijk intercultureel competenter worden. Mede om het leerrendement van internationalisering beter in kaart te brengen, is binnen Zuyd Hogeschool de Global Mind Monitor ontwikkeld, een kwantitatief meetinstrument dat zowel de effecten van internationalisering in eigen land als over de grenzen kan meten. In dit artikel gebruiken we recente data (2015-2016) van een eerste longitudinale pilot study bij 320 studenten met dit meetinstrument. Op basis van t-toetsen en meervoudige regressieanalyses onderzoeken we met name het belang van culturele afstand tot het gastland voor de ontwikkeling van interculturele competenties bij studenten. De analytische modellen bevestigen onze verwachting: hoe groter de culturele afstand tussen het thuisland en het gastland, hoe sterker het leereffect. Deze resultaten kunnen nuttige inzichten opleveren voor de verdere ontwikkeling van in internationalisering, zowel over de grens als ‘at home’.
