BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence indicates the potential benefits of restricted fluid management in critically ill patients. Evidence lacks on the optimal fluid management strategy for invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that the cumulative fluid balance would affect the successful liberation of invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).METHODS: We analyzed data from the multicenter observational 'PRactice of VENTilation in COVID-19 patients' study. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 and ARDS who required invasive ventilation during the first 3 months of the international outbreak (March 1, 2020, to June 2020) across 22 hospitals in the Netherlands were included. The primary outcome was successful liberation of invasive ventilation, modeled as a function of day 3 cumulative fluid balance using Cox proportional hazards models, using the crude and the adjusted association. Sensitivity analyses without missing data and modeling ARDS severity were performed.RESULTS: Among 650 patients, three groups were identified. Patients in the higher, intermediate, and lower groups had a median cumulative fluid balance of 1.98 L (1.27-7.72 L), 0.78 L (0.26-1.27 L), and - 0.35 L (- 6.52-0.26 L), respectively. Higher day 3 cumulative fluid balance was significantly associated with a lower probability of successful ventilation liberation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.95, P = 0.0047). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results.CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 and ARDS, a higher cumulative fluid balance was associated with a longer ventilation duration, indicating that restricted fluid management in these patients may be beneficial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04346342 ); Date of registration: April 15, 2020.
Zorgcapaciteit kan een belangrijke schakel zijn tussen multi-probleem omstandigheden en ongunstige ontwikkeling van kinderen. Deze studie heeft als doel om de zorgcapaciteit en de correlaties daartussen te onderzoeken in zeer kwetsbare multiprobleemgezinnen in Rotterdam, Nederland. Zorgcapaciteit (algemeen, emotioneel en instrumenteel) werd prospectief beoordeeld bij 83 zeer kwetsbare vrouwen met behulp van video-observaties van dagelijkse zorgtaken, zes weken postpartum. Ondersteunende gegevens werden verzameld op drie tijdstippen: bij inclusie, zes weken na inclusie en zes weken postpartum, en deze omvatten psychologische symptomen, zelfredzaamheid, problematische levensdomeinen, thuisomgeving, inkomen, depressie, angst en stress. Zwangerschaps- en bevallingsgerelateerde informatie werd verzameld bij verloskundigen. De scores voor zorgverlening door de moeder waren gemiddeld van onvoldoende kwaliteit. Moeders die in een onveilige thuisomgeving leefden (B = 0,62) en moeders met meer problematische levensdomeinen (≤3 domeinen, B = 0,32) vertoonden significant hogere instrumentele zorgcapaciteiten. Andere variabelen waren niet gerelateerd aan zorgcapaciteit. De zorgcapaciteit in deze zeer kwetsbare populatie was van onvoldoende kwaliteit. In de meeste gevallen was er echter geen significant verband tussen zorgzaamheid en de variabelen die gerelateerd zijn aan kwetsbaarheid. Dit betekent dat een mogelijk verband tussen kwetsbaarheid en zorgcapaciteit kan worden veroorzaakt door de interactie tussen verschillende problemen, in plaats van door het type of de omvang van de zorg.
MULTIFILE
Abstract Purpose To determine the predictive value of quality of life for mortality at the domain and item levels. Methods This longitudinal study was carried out in a sample of 479 Dutch people aged 75 years or older living independently, using a follow-up of 7 years. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire. Quality of life was assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF, including four domains: physical health, psychological, social relationships, and environment. The municipality of Roosendaal (a town in the Netherlands) indicated the dates of death of the individuals. Results Based on mean, all quality of life domains predicted mortality adjusted for gender, age, marital status, education, and income. The hazard ratios ranged from 0.811 (psychological) to 0.933 (social relationships). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the four domains were 0.730 (physical health), 0.723 (psychological), 0.693 (social relationships), and 0.700 (environment). In all quality of life domains, at least one item predicted mortality (adjusted). Conclusion Our study showed that all four quality of life domains belonging to the WHOQOL-BREF predict mortality in a sample of Dutch community-dwelling older people using a follow-up period of 7 years. Two AUCs were above threshold (psychological, physical health). The findings offer health care and welfare professionals evidence for conducting interventions to reduce the risk of premature death.
