Introduction: Bruxism is a repetitive masticatory muscle activity that may cause substantial morbidity and reduce the quality of life in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Assessment methods most commonly used were caregiver reporting and dental examination, This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and to describe the currently used assessment methods for bruxism in this population. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using a multi-component search strategy. We used a random effects model to calculate the prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals for each study, for all studies combined, and specifically for Rett syndrome (RS), cerebral palsy (CP), Down syndrome (DS), and “other disorders (primarily Angelman syndrome and Prader–Willi syndrome).” Results: The prevalence for the entire group based on a random effects model was found to be 49 % (95 %CI 41–57 %) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 93 %, p < 0.01), for RS 74 % (95 %CI 53–88 %, I2 = 84 %, p < 0.01), CP 48 % (95 %CI 38–57 %, I2 = 86 %, p < 0.01), DS 40 % (95 %CI 33–47 %, I2 = 60 %, p < 0.01) and “other disorders” 40 % (95 %CI 18–67 %, I2 = 98 %, p < 0.01). The group prevalences were not equal, indicating a significant difference (P-value = 0.03), with a notably higher likelihood of RS. Conclusion: We observed a five-fold increased likelihood of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. The disorder with the highest prevalence was Rett syndrome, with a seven-fold increased likelihood of bruxism. The increased likelihood of bruxism in this vulnerable group of children demands clinicians pay heed to this substantial morbidity.
DOCUMENT
The influence of a person’s environment and its modifying potential on participation is well recognized for most childhood disabilities, but scarcely studied for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A scoping review was conducted, the aim of which was to map the existing literature about supporting and hindering environments for the participation of adolescents with ASD. Sources of scientific evidence were searched for in four databases. Inclusion criteria were the perspectives of adolescents between 12 and 21, families, peers, or significant others; ecologic validity; and a clear connection between environment and participation. The publication dates ranged from 2001 to 2014 and partly up to 2018. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) served as the guiding framework for inclusion/exclusion during the selection process. Thematic analysis was performed by five independent reviewers. Results were additionally validated by stakeholders. This scoping review identified 5528 articles, and finally included 31 studies. Two main themes were found: “providing security” indicates how the environment, and specifically the parental, physical, and informational environments, have a securing or intimidating effect. The second theme, “helping to connect”, indicates which environments support or hinder social relationships or social activities, and hence participation. An additional third main theme, “tension in participation”, relates to ambiguities that seem essential to understand participation or isolation of adolescents with ASD. Results show that participation is a value-laden concept. This research widens the field of dealing with adolescents with ASD, as it directs attention towards the responsibility of the environment regarding participation.
DOCUMENT
Background: Current use of smartphone cameras by parents create opportunities for longitudinal home-video-assessments to monitor infant development. We developed and validated a home-video method for parents, enabling Pediatric Physical Therapists to assess infants’ gross motor development with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of this home-video method from the parents’ perspective. Methods: Parents of 59 typically developing infants (0–19 months) were recruited, 45 parents participated in the study. Information about dropout was collected. A sequential mixed methods design was used to examine feasibility, including questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. While the questionnaires inquired after the practical feasibility of the home-video method, the interviews also allowed parents to comment on their feelings and thoughts using the home-video method. Results: Of 45 participating parents, 34 parents returned both questionnaires and eight parents agreed to an interview. Parent reported effort by the infants was very low: the home-video method is perceived as similar to the normal routine of playing. The parental effort level was acceptable. The main constraint parents reported was time planning. Parents noted it was sometimes difficult to find the right moment to record the infant’s motor behavior, that is, when parents were both at home and their baby was in the appropriate state. Technical problems with the web portal, reported by 28% of the parents were also experienced as a constraint. Positive factors mentioned by parents were: the belief that the home videos are valuable for family use, receiving feedback from a professional, the moments of one-on-one attention and interaction with their babies. Moreover, the process of recording the home videos resulted in an increased parental awareness of, and insight into, the gross motor development of their infant. Conclusion: The AIMS home-video method is feasible for parents of typically developing children. Most constraints are of a practical nature that can be addressed in future applications. Future research is needed to show whether the home-video method is also applicable for parents with an infant at risk of motor development problems.
DOCUMENT
