This project builds upon a collaboration which has been established since 15 years in the field of social work between teachers and lecturers of Zuyd University, HU University and Elte University. Another network joining this project was CARe Europe, an NGO aimed at improving community care throughout Europe. Before the start of the project already HU University, Tallinn Mental Health Centre and Kwintes were participating in this network. In the course of several international meetings (e.g. CARe Europe conference in Prague in 2005, ENSACT conferences in Dubrovnik in 2009, and Brussels in April 2011, ESN conference in Brussels in March 2011), and many local meetings, it became clear that professionals in the social sector have difficulties to change current practices. There is a great need to develop new methods, which professionals can use to create community care.
Deze review van de literatuur richt zich in het bijzonder op de sociale dynamiek rondom geweld in de publieke ruimte. In gevallen waarin de online dynamiek het gebruik van geweld oproept of stimuleert spreken we van ‘online aanjaging’. Hoe kunnen netwerkpartners die verantwoordelijk zijn voor de openbare orde en veiligheid zich in deze online dynamiek mengen, en welke gevolgen heeft de online aanwezigheid van deze netwerkpartners? Gemeenten werken in deze vraagstukken samen aan een integrale aanpak in een netwerk van partners zoals politie en jongerenwerk, maar ook scholen en reclassering. Om het raakvlak met het werkveld voldoende te borgen is de review aangevuld met een stakeholdersbijeenkomst van AcVZ met netwerkpartners, waarnaar we op relevante plaatsen in dit rapport verwijzen. Deze vond plaats voordat de review is uitgevoerd.
Building resilience to radicalization has become a key pillar of many policies for preventing violent extremism. However, sustained debates over the precise nature of the terms radicalisation and resilience impact the ability to implement these policies. A growing body of literature argues that the way in which key ideas are understood matters to what happens in practice. Additionally, the cross-sector collaboration called for in PVE policy can be made more challenging through divergences in understanding of central concepts. As such, the way in which resilience to radicalization is being understood by frontline workers matters. In light of this, a q-methodology study was conducted, which identified four perspectives on resilience to radicalization amongst policy-makers and practitioners in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK. These perspectives are examined in light of the broader debates around both resilience and radicalization, and the extent to which the divergences matter for collaboration is considered.
