from the article: Abstract Based on a review of recent literature, this paper addresses the question of how urban planners can steer urban environmental quality, given the fact that it is multidimensional in character, is assessed largely in subjective terms and varies across time. The paper explores three questions that are at the core of planning and designing cities: ‘quality of what?’, ‘quality for whom?’ and ‘quality at what time?’ and illustrates the dilemmas that urban planners face in answering these questions. The three questions provide a novel framework that offers urban planners perspectives for action in finding their way out of the dilemmas identified. Rather than further detailing the exact nature of urban quality, these perspectives call for an approach to urban planning that is integrated, participative and adaptive. ; ; sustainable urban development; trade-offs; quality dimensions
Across Dutch municipalities, unusual collaborative initiatives emerge that aim to stimulate the creation of value from municipal waste resources. Circular economy literature proposes that experimentation competences are important for developing initiatives towards circular business models and a wide range of innovation frameworks and business model toolkits have been developed to support the development of circular business models based on experimentation.However, more insight is needed to understand how experimentation contributes to the development of urban upcycling initiatives, in particular those where collaborative business models are created. Literature suggest that business model experimentation occurs differently in various collaborative contexts. For example, depending on the type of initiating focal actors involved, collaborative business models develop along different pathways Therefore, we aim to understand how experimentation occurs in various types of collaborative urban upcycling initiatives and we investigate the following research question: How do stakeholders in collaborative urban upcycling initiatives use experimentation to develop circular business models?
Upcycling has been embraced by circular economy enthusiasts, policy-makers and collaborative initiatives across Europe. Early studies describe upcycling as a concept aimed at resource conservation by keeping products, components and materials at their highest potential value across consecutive product lifecycles, with zero-negative or even potential positive impact on the natural environment. Similarly, more recent literature on the circular economy views upcycling as a strategy to slow and close resource cycles through product life-extension approaches, such as reuse, repair, refurbishment, remanufacturing and repurpose. With growing environmental concerns, upcycling has become a re-emerging theme in literature and practice. Cities offer opportunities for an increasing number of upcycling initiatives, but little is known about what manifestations of upcycling occur specifically in urban areas or how these urban upcycling initiatives emerge. For example, so-called Urban Resource Centers seek to tackle challenges in urban solid waste management by encouraging entrepreneurs to create value from local waste streams. Therefore, our objective is to address this literature gap and explore manifestations of upcycling in a city context by means of qualitative research, following a case-study approach based on data collected from research archives and 17 preliminary interviews with entrepreneurs and experts in urban upcycling of furniture and interior design products. This study contributes to a structured overview of urban upcycling initiatives and the internal and external factors that drive entrepreneurial initiatives and development. Future work will build on this study to make urban upcycling initiatives more widespread and impactful to deliver on their environmental and social goals.
MULTIFILE
Nederland wil in 2050 circulair zijn. Dat vraagt een ongekende transitie in de wijze waarop onze samenleving onderneemt, samenwerkt, denkt en doet. Stedelijke regio’s zijn de geijkte plek om een transitie naar een circulaire economie in gang te zetten door hun dichte concentratie van kennis, kapitaal, data en resources op een relatief klein oppervlak. De baten die deze transitie oplevert zullen vooral in deze regio’s merkbaar zijn: minder verspilling, luchtvervuiling en CO2-uitstoot, meer economische waarde en sociale impact. CIRCOLLAB richt zich op het versterken van interdisciplinair praktijkgericht onderzoek voor de circulaire transitie in de metropoolregio Amsterdam (MRA). De SPRONG-groep bestaat uit lectoraten van de Centres of Expertise Urban Technology en Urban Governance & Social Innovation en de Faculteit Digitale Media en Creatieve Industrie van de Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Kenniscentrum Maatschappelijke Innovatie Flevoland van Hogeschool Windesheim en de Academie van Bouwkunst van de Amsterdamse Hogeschool voor de Kunsten. De SPRONG-groep combineert expertise vanuit het technologische, creatieve, economische en sociale domein en verricht praktijkgericht onderzoek naar ‘circulair denken en doen’, ‘circulair ondernemen’, ‘circulair menselijk kapitaal’ en ‘circulair samenwerken’ in relatie tot technische innovaties in twee waardeketens: de gebouwde omgeving en consumptiegoederen. De SPRONG-groep ontwikkelt, samen met actoren in de quadruple helix, een regionale infrastructuur voor inventariseren en prioriteren van onderzoeksbehoeften en het programmeren, opbouwen en uitwisselen van kennis. Hierbij worden kennis en ervaringen uit circulaire initiatieven, experimenten, onderzoek en onderwijs aan elkaar en aan fysieke experimenteerruimtes verbonden, om gezamenlijk van te leren, kennis te delen en op te schalen. Zo ontstaat een krachtige interdisciplinaire SPRONGgroep met de ambitie om het consortium uit te laten groeien tot dé regionale spil op het gebied van de circulaire transitie in grootstedelijke regio’s en een erkende (inter)nationale speler voor kennisuitwisseling en -opbouw op dit onderwerp.
