While the technical application domain seems to be to most established field for AI applications, the field is at the very beginning to identify and implement responsible and fair AI applications. Technical, non-user facing services indirectly model user behavior as a consequence of which unexpected issues of privacy, fairness and lack of autonomy may emerge. There is a need for design methods that take the potential impact of AI systems into account.
Although governments are investing heavily in big data analytics, reports show mixed results in terms of performance. Whilst big data analytics capability provided a valuable lens in business and seems useful for the public sector, there is little knowledge of its relationship with governmental performance. This study aims to explain how big data analytics capability led to governmental performance. Using a survey research methodology, an integrated conceptual model is proposed highlighting a comprehensive set of big data analytics resources influencing governmental performance. The conceptual model was developed based on prior literature. Using a PLS-SEM approach, the results strongly support the posited hypotheses. Big data analytics capability has a strong impact on governmental efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness. The findings of this paper confirmed the imperative role of big data analytics capability in governmental performance in the public sector, which earlier studies found in the private sector. This study also validated measures of governmental performance.
MULTIFILE
Content moderation is commonly used by social media platforms to curb the spread of hateful content. Yet, little is known about how users perceive this practice and which factors may influence their perceptions. Publicly denouncing content moderation—for example, portraying it as a limitation to free speech or as a form of political targeting—may play an important role in this context. Evaluations of moderation may also depend on interpersonal mechanisms triggered by perceived user characteristics. In this study, we disentangle these different factors by examining how the gender, perceived similarity, and social influence of a user publicly complaining about a content-removal decision influence evaluations of moderation. In an experiment (n = 1,586) conducted in the United States, the Netherlands, and Portugal, participants witnessed the moderation of a hateful post, followed by a publicly posted complaint about moderation by the affected user. Evaluations of the fairness, legitimacy, and bias of the moderation decision were measured, as well as perceived similarity and social influence as mediators. The results indicate that arguments about freedom of speech significantly lower the perceived fairness of content moderation. Factors such as social influence of the moderated user impacted outcomes differently depending on the moderated user’s gender. We discuss implications of these findings for content-moderation practices.
Moderatie van lezersreacties onder nieuwsartikelen is erg arbeidsintensief. Met behulp van kunstmatige intelligentie wordt moderatie mogelijk tegen een redelijke prijs. Aangezien elke toepassing van kunstmatige intelligentie eerlijk en transparant moet zijn, is het belangrijk om te onderzoeken hoe media hieraan kunnen voldoen.Doel Dit promotieproject zal zich richten op de rechtvaardigheid, accountability en transparantie van algoritmische systemen voor het modereren van lezersreacties. Het biedt een theoretisch kader en bruikbare matregelen die nieuwsorganisaties zullen ondersteunen in het naleven van recente beleidsvorming voor een waardegedreven implementatie van AI. Nu steeds meer nieuwsmedia AI gaan gebruiken, moeten ze rechtvaardigheid, accountability en transparantie in hun gebruik van algoritmen meenemen in hun werkwijzen. Resultaten Hoewel moderatie met AI zeer aantrekkelijk is vanuit economisch oogpunt, moeten nieuwsmedia weten hoe ze onnauwkeurigheid en bias kunnen verminderen (fairness), de werking van hun AI bekendmaken (accountability) en de gebruikers laten begrijpen hoe beslissingen via AI worden genomen (transparancy). Dit proefschrift bevordert de kennis over deze onderwerpen. Looptijd 01 februari 2022 - 01 februari 2025 Aanpak De centrale onderzoeksvraag van dit promotieonderzoek is: Hoe kunnen en moeten nieuwsmedia rechtvaardigheid, accountability en transparantie in hun gebruik van algoritmes voor commentmoderatie? Om deze vraag te beantwoorden is het onderzoek opgesplitst in vier deelvragen. Hoe gebruiken nieuwsmedia algoritmes voor het modereren van reacties? Wat kunnen nieuwsmedia doen om onnauwkeurigheid en bias bij het modereren via AI van reacties te verminderen? Wat moeten nieuwsmedia bekendmaken over hun gebruik van moderatie via AI? Wat maakt uitleg van moderatie via AI begrijpelijk voor gebruikers van verschillende niveaus van digitale competentie?
