Naast sport- en beweegaanbod en ruimtelijke ordening biedt ook innovatieve technologie nieuwe mogelijkheden om mensen te stimuleren meer te bewegen. Op basis van onderzoeksresultaten en praktijkrealisaties in Amsterdam en Eindhoven worden mogelijkheden die innovatieve technologie kan bieden voor een actieve en sportieve leefstijl en leefomgeving weergegeven. Ook worden voorbeelden gegeven van persoonlijke evidence based hardloop apps en andere interactieve technologieën (zoals beacons en interactieve hardloop en wandelroutes) om beweeggedrag in de openbare ruimte te vergroten.
DOCUMENT
Urban environments are full of noise and obstacles, and therefore potentially dangerous and difficult to navigate for the visually impaired. Using Bluetooth beacons and a smartphone app we guide them through these environments by providing the information needed for that specific location. We present the preliminary results concerning the usability of our approach.
DOCUMENT
Urban environments are full of noise and obstacles, and therefore potentially dangerous and difficult to navigate for the visually impaired. Using Bluetooth beacons and a smartphone app we guide them through these environments by providing the information needed for that specific location. We present the preliminary results concerning the usability of our approach.
DOCUMENT
Volgens meerdere marketeers zijn beacons ‘the next big thing’; en grote retailers als de Bijenkorf zetten beacons al in. Klanten kopen namelijk steeds meer via internet, en winkels zoeken daarom naar manieren om een beleving te bieden, zodat klanten naar de winkel blijven komen.
DOCUMENT
Introduction: Visually impaired people experience trouble with navigation and orientation due to their weakened ability to rely on eyesight to monitor the environment [1][2]. Smartphones such as the iPhone are already popular devices among the visually impaired for navigating [3]. We explored if an iPhone application that responds to Bluetooth beacons to inform the user about their environment could aid the visually impaired in navigation in an urban environment.Method: We tested the implementation in an urban environment with visually impaired people using the route from the Amsterdam Bijlmer train station to the Royal Dutch Visio office. Bluetooth beacons were attached at two meters high to lampposts and traffic signs along a specified route to give the user instructions via a custom made iPhone app. Three different obstacle types were identified and implemented in the app: a crossover with traffic signs, a car parking entrance and objects blocking the pathway like stairs. Based on the work of Atkin et al.[5] and Havik et al. [6] at each obstacle the beacon will trigger the app to present important information about the surroundings like potential hazards nearby, how to navigate around or through obstacles and information about the next obstacle. The information is presented using pictures of the environment and instructions in text and voice based on Giudice et al. [4]. The application uses Apple’s accessibility features to communicate the instructions with VoiceOver screenreader. The app allows the user to preview the route, to prepare for upcoming obstacles and landmarks. Last, users can customize the app by specifying the amount of detail in images and information the app presents.To determine if the app is more useful for the participants than their current navigational method, participants walked the route both with and without the application. When walking with the app, participants were guided by the app. When walking without the app they used their own navigational method. During both walks a supervisor ensured the safety of the participant.During both walks, after each obstacle, participants were asked how safe they felt. We used a five point Likert scale where one stood for “feeling very safe” and five for “feeling very unsafe”.Qualitative feedback on the usability of the app was collected using the speak-a-lout method during walking and by interview afster walking.Results: Five visually impaired participated, one female and five males, age range from 30 to 78 and with varying levels of visual limitations. Three participants were familiar with the route and two walked the route for the first time.After each obstacle participants rated how safe they felt on a five point Likert scale. We normalized the results by deducting the scores of the walk without the app from the scores of the walk with the app. The average of all participants is shown in figure 2. When passing the traffic light halfway during the route we see that the participants feel safer with than without the app.Summarizing the qualitative feedback, we noticed that all participants indicated feeling supported by the app. They found the type of instructions ideal for walking and learning new routes. Of the five participants, three found the length of the instructions appropriate and two found them too long. They would like to split the detailed instructions in a short instruction and the option for more detailed instructions. They felt that a detailed instruction gave too much information in a hazardous environment like a crossover. Two participants found the information focused on orientation not necessary, while three participants liked knowing their surroundings.Conclusion and discussion: Regarding the safety questions we see that participants felt safer with the app, especially when crossing the road with traffic lights. We believe this big difference in comparison to the other obstacles is due to the crossover being considered more dangerous than the other obstacles. This is reflected by their feedback in requesting less direct information at these locations.All participants indicated feeling supported and at ease with our application, stating they would use the application when walking new routes.Because of the small sample size we consider our results an indication that the app can be of help and a good start for further research on guiding people through an urban environment using beacons.
DOCUMENT
In deze workshop komen het bevorderen van sportparticipatie en de rol van applicaties en wearables hierin naar voren. Met aandacht voor: apps voor hardlopers, apps voor inactieven, apps voor professionals en patiënten, ideeën voor de toekomst
DOCUMENT
In deze presentatie komen de volgende onderwerpen aan bod: wie gebruiken apps en wearables, resultaten onderzoek apps en leefstijl/gezondheid, nieuwe projecten waarin technologie ingezet wordt om bewegen te stimuleren en ideeen voor de toekomst.
DOCUMENT
Een overvloed aan technologieën doet haar intrede in de fysieke retail. Digitale displays, interactieve schermen, beacons, apps, virtual reality en augmented reality; allen beloven ze de retailer succes. Maar hoe bepaal je of deze technologische innovaties echt van toegevoegde waarde zijn? Het aankoopproces van de klant lijkt handvatten te bieden.
LINK
This work is on 3-D localization of sensor motes in massive swarms based solely on 1-D relative distance-measurements between neighbouring motes. We target applications in remote and difficult-to-access environments such as the exploration and mapping of the interior of oil reservoirs where hundreds or thousands of motes are used. These applications bring forward the need to use highly miniaturized sensor motes of less than 1 centimeter, thereby significantly limiting measurement and processing capabilities. These constraints, in combination with additional limitations posed by the environments, impede the communication of unique hardware identifiers, as well as communication with external, fixed beacons.
DOCUMENT
Emotions embody the value in tourism experiences and drive essential outcomes such as intent to recommend. Current models do not explain how the ebb and flow of emotional arousal during an experience relate to outcomes, however. We analyzed 15 participants’ experiences at the Vincentre museum and guided village tour in Nuenen, the Netherlands. This Vincent van Gogh-themed experience led to a wide range of intent to recommend and emotional arousal, measured as continuous phasic skin conductance, across participants and exhibits. Mixed-effects analyses modeled emotional arousal as a function of proximity to exhibits and intent to recommend. Experiences with the best outcomes featured moments of both high and low emotional arousal, not one continuous “high,” with more emotion during the middle of the experience. Tourist experience models should account for a complex relationship between emotions experienced and outcomes such as intent to recommend. Simply put, more emotion is not always better.
DOCUMENT
