Op 28 augustus 2014 heb ik een 'oral presentation' gegeven op het European Health Psychology Society congres te Innsbruck. De abstract van het artikel die ik gepresenteerd heb is gepubliceerd op de website van EHPS (zie bijgevoegd de link) The aim was to quantify the relationship between behavioural determinants and dental health behaviour among 9-18 year old children. Methods: Searches were conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE. In total 25 studies were included, which addressed 16 variables. A weighted average effect size correlation (WAES r) was calculated per determinant and dental health behaviour. According to Cohen (1988) effect sizes can be considered as small (r = 0.10), medium (r = 0.30) and large (r = 0.50). Findings: All WAES r’s were significant and revealed a positive relation between determinant and dental health behaviour. Large effects were found for coping planning and self-efficacy. Medium-to-large effects were found for the determinants: intention, affective attitude, and action planning. The WAES r was small-to-medium effects were found for: social norms, cognitive attitude, knowledge, parental oral health behaviour and parental cognitions. Discussion: Although the number of studies focusing on volitional factors are limited, the overall findings highlight the importance of volitional factors, rather than knowledge or motivational factors in explaining dental health behaviour. Refbacks There are currently no refbacks.
LINK
Designing solutions for complex behaviour change processes can be greatly aided by integrating insights from the behavioural sciences into design practice. However, this integration is hampered by the relative inaccessibility of behavioral scientific knowledge. Working in a multidisciplinary of design researchers and behavioural scientists may bridge the gap between the two fields. This paper shares our experiences in working as such a multidisciplinary group on a large project, amongst others consisting of the design of interventions for workplace safety. Our cooperation was fruitful, both for design researchers – being able to better structure the messiness of the design process –, behavioural scientists – gaining in ecological validity of their methods –, and commissioners – increased trust in potential outcomes of the design process. However, difficulties preventing synergy also transpired.
MULTIFILE
After the integration of research activities, universities of applied sciences (UASs) have formulated organisational strategies to foster connections between research and education (Daas et al., 2023). Scholars stated that the behaviour of employees within UASs influences ‘the direction and tempo in which the proposed aims are reached or resisted in the wider organisation’ (Griffioen & De Jong, 2017, p. 454). Thus, employees within UASs, such as academics and lower-level managers, play a key role in establishing research-education connections (Jenkins & Healey, 2005; Van der Rijst, 2009). A recent study has shown that academics and lower-level managers connect research and education through three types of behaviours: by involving aspects of research in education, by involving aspects of education in research, and by involving aspects of research and education equally, with the first type mentioned most often (Daas & Griffioen, in review). Similar patterns are observed in previous studies highlighting how education benefits from research rather than vice versa (Taylor, 2007). However, the beliefs underpinning this behavioural focus still remain unclear. Scholars have reported factors that could influence employees in connecting research and education, such as career stages, personal abilities and the availability of resources influencing how academics combine research and teaching tasks (Coate, Barnett & Williams, 2001; Shin, 2011), and research productivity and teaching beliefs influencing how academics integrate research in teaching (Hu et al., 2015; Magi & Beerkens, 2016). Despite the important value of these insights, these studies all focus on one (set of) behaviour(s) in connecting research and education instead of considering factors influencing behaviours in connecting research and education holistically. Moreover, most of these studies consider academics instead of managers. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the beliefs underpinning the behaviour of academics and lower-level managers in UASs in connecting research and education.To study the underpinning beliefs we applied the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB; Ajzen, 1991) as a theoretical lens. According to the TPB, a person’s behavioural intentions are shaped through three determinants (Ajzen, 1991). Behavioural beliefs (1) refer to a person’s conceptions about the expected positive/negative outcomes of practicing the behaviour. Normative beliefs (2) consist of a person’s conceptions about whether others approve/disapprove of practicing the behaviour. Control beliefs (3) are a person's conceptions about the presumed factors that could enable/hinder in practicing the behaviour. The research question is: Which behavioural, normative and control beliefs underpin the behaviour of academics and lower-level managers in connecting research and education?
DOCUMENT
This PD project aims to gather new knowledge through artistic and participatory design research within neighbourhoods for possible ways of addressing and understanding the avoidance and numbness caused by feelings of vulnerability, discomfort and pain associated with eco-anxiety and chronic fear of environmental doom. The project will include artistic production and suitable forms of fieldwork. The objectives of the PD are to find answers to the practice problem of society which call for art that sensitises, makes aware and helps initiate behavioural change around the consequences of climate change. Rather than visualize future sea levels directly, it will seek to engage with climate change in a metaphorical and poetic way. Neither a doom nor an overly techno-optimistic scenario seem useful to understand the complexity of flood risk management or the dangers of flooding. By challenging both perspectives with artistic means, this research hopes to counter eco-anxiety and create a sense of open thought and susceptibility to new ideas, feelings and chains of thought. Animation and humour, are possible ingredients. The objective is to find and create multiple Dutch water stories, not just one. To achieve this, it is necessary to develop new methods for selecting and repurposing existing impactful stories and strong images. Citizens and students will be included to do so via fieldwork. In addition, archival materials will be used. Archives serve as a repository for memory recollection and reuse, selecting material from the audiovisual archive of the Institute of Sound & Vision will be a crucial part of the creative work which will include two films and accompanying music.
PBL is the initiator of the Work Programme Monitoring and Management Circular Economy 2019-2023, a collaboration between CBS, CML, CPB, RIVM, TNO, UU. Holidays and mobility are part of the consumption domains that PBL researches, and this project aims to calculate the environmental gains per person per year of the various circular behavioural options for both holiday behaviour and daily mobility. For both behaviours, a range of typical (default) trips are defined and for each several circular option explored for CO2 emissions, Global warming potential and land use. The holiday part is supplied by the Centre for Sustainability, Tourism and Transport (CSTT) of the BUas Academy of Tourism (AfT). The mobility part is carried out by the Urban Intelligence professorship of the Academy for Built Environment and Logistics (ABEL).The research question is “what is the environmental impact of various circular (behavioural) options around 1) holidays and 2) passenger mobility?” The consumer perspective is demarcated as follows:For holidays, transportation and accommodation are included, but not food, attractions visited and holiday activitiesFor mobility, it concerns only the circular options of passenger transport and private means of transport (i.e. freight transport, business travel and commuting are excluded). Not only some typical trips will be evaluated, but also the possession of a car and its alternatives.For the calculations, we make use of public databases, our own models and the EAP (Environmental Analysis Program) model developed by the University of Groningen. BUAs projectmembers: Centre for Sustainability, Tourism and Transport (AT), Urban Intelligence (ABEL).
Onderzoek laat zien dat gedragsproblemen en leesproblemen vaak gelijktijdig voorkomen. Maar waar moet de leerkracht zich op richten; het gedrag of de leesprestaties? Voor de onderwijspraktijk is het relevant om uitsluitsel te krijgen over hoe deze problematiek in elkaar zit.Doel Uit veel onderzoek komt naar voren dat gedragsproblemen en leesproblemen bij veel kinderen min of meer gelijktijdig voorkomen. Leerkrachten zijn in deze situatie geneigd zich eerst te richten op het gedrag aangezien ze daar de meeste last van hebben. De primaire gerichtheid op gedragsproblemen uit zich ook in de grote vraag die er is naar begeleiding van leerkrachten bij het voorkomen en bestrijden van gedragsproblemen en de oververtegenwoordiging van studenten die bij de Master EN bij het Seminarium voor Orthopedagogiek de route Gedrag kiezen. De vraag is of deze gerichtheid terecht is en inderdaad tot de oplossing van de problemen leidt dan wel dat een achterliggend probleem de oorzaak is; namelijk een leesprobleem dat bij de leerling gedragsproblemen veroorzaakt. Het is relevant voor zowel de onderwijspraktijk als de opleidingen om uitsluitsel te krijgen over hoe deze problematiek in elkaar zit. In dit proefschrift wordt beoogd de vraag te beantwoorden of de gerichtheid op gedragsproblemen terecht is. Ook wil hiermee tegemoet worden gekomen aan de behoefte aan onderzoek waarmee de praktijk duidelijkere handvatten aangereikt krijgt om om te gaan met deze problemen en waar te beginnen met het bestrijden en voorkomen van de problemen. De volgende onderzoeksvragen worden beantwoord: 1) Gaan leesproblemen vooraf aan gedragsproblemen, is het andersom of is er sprake van wederzijdse volgtijdelijkheid? 2) Veroorzaken leesproblemen gedragsproblemen, is het andersom of veroorzaken zij elkaar? 3) In welke mate is lezen en gedrag te beïnvloeden door de leerkracht? Resultaten Het gedrag van leerlingen tijdens de leesles (aandacht, verstorend gedrag, emotionele stabiliteit) blijkt niet bij te dragen aan hun leesvaardigheid aan het eind van datzelfde schooljaar (groep 5); het is dus niet zo dat leerlingen die zich beter gedragen aan het begin van het jaar, beter lezen aan het eind van het jaar. Andersom is het wel zo dat leerlingen die aan het begin van het jaar beter lezen, zich aan het eind van het jaar beter gedragen (Brokamp, Houtveen & Van de Grift, 2018b; Brokamp, Houtveen & Van de Grift, submitted). Er wordt momenteel vervolgonderzoek uitgevoerd om te kijken of deze trend hetzelfde is over meerdere leerjaren. Wanneer gekeken wordt naar wat de leerkracht kan doen om zowel het lezen als het gedrag van de leerlingen tijdens de leesles te beïnvloeden, blijkt dat de leerkracht door het geven van een kwalitatief goede leesles ervoor kan zorgen dat de leerlingen beter gaan lezen, maar ook meer gefocust zijn, minder verstorend gedrag vertonen en (in minder mate) meer zelfvertrouwen hebben. Voor de praktijk heeft dit een belangrijke implicatie, namelijk het belang van goed leesonderwijs; het geven van een goede leesles zorgt niet alleen voor verbetering van de leesprestaties maar kan ook in positieve zin bijdragen aan het gedrag van de leerlingen (Brokamp, Houtveen & Van de Grift, 2016; 2018a). Brokamp, S.K., Houtveen, A.A.M., & Van de Grift, W.J.C.M. (submitted). Reading and behavioural and emotional engagement: a bidirectional relationship? Brokamp, S.K., Houtveen, A.A.M., & Van de Grift, W.J.C.M (2016, January). Reading, classroom behaviour and teaching skills. Paper presented at ICSEI 2016 Conference, Glasgow, UK. Brokamp, S.K., Houtveen, A.A.M., & Van de Grift, W.J.C.M (2018a). The relationship among students' reading performance, their classroom behavior, and teacher skills. The Journal of Educational Research. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2017.1411878 Brokamp, S.K., Houtveen, A.A.M., & Van de Grift, W.J.C.M (2018b, Juni). Leesvaardigheid en betrokkenheid tijdens het lezen: een bidirectionele relatie?. Paper gepresenteerd op de ORD 2018 Conferentie, Nijmegen, Nederland. Looptijd 01 december 2012 - 31 december 2020 Aanpak In het onderzoek meten we zowel het gedrag tijdens de leesles als de leesvaardigheid van de leerlingen over meerdere jaren. Ook bekijken we het instructiegedrag en algemeen pedagogisch handelen van de leerkrachten om de vraag te kunnen beantwoorden in welke mate de leerkrachten het lezen en gedrag van de leerlingen kunnen beïnvloeden.
Lectoraat, onderdeel van NHL Stenden Hogeschool
