From the publisher: "Background: The introduction of whole new foods in a population may lead to sensitization and food allergy. This constitutes a potential public health problem and a challenge to risk assessors and managers as the existing understanding of the pathophysiological processes and the currently available biological tools for prediction of the risk for food allergy development and the severity of the reaction are not sufficient. There is a substantial body of in vivo and in vitro data describing molecular and cellular events potentially involved in food sensitization. However, these events have not been organized in a sequence of related events that is plausible to result in sensitization, and useful to challenge current hypotheses. The aim of this manuscript was to collect and structure the current mechanistic understanding of sensitization induction to food proteins by applying the concept of adverse outcome pathway (AOP). Main body: The proposed AOP for food sensitization is based on information on molecular and cellular mechanisms and pathways evidenced to be involved in sensitization by food and food proteins and uses the AOPs for chemical skin sensitization and respiratory sensitization induction as templates. Available mechanistic data on protein respiratory sensitization were included to fill out gaps in the understanding of how proteins may affect cells, cell-cell interactions and tissue homeostasis. Analysis revealed several key events (KE) and biomarkers that may have potential use in testing and assessment of proteins for their sensitizing potential. Conclusion: The application of the AOP concept to structure mechanistic in vivo and in vitro knowledge has made it possible to identify a number of methods, each addressing a specific KE, that provide information about the food allergenic potential of new proteins. When applied in the context of an integrated strategy these methods may reduce, if not replace, current animal testing approaches. The proposed AOP will be shared at the www.aopwiki.org platform to expand the mechanistic data, improve the confidence in each of the proposed KE and key event relations (KERs), and allow for the identification of new, or refinement of established KE and KERs." Authors: Jolanda H. M. van BilsenEmail author, Edyta Sienkiewicz-Szłapka, Daniel Lozano-Ojalvo, Linette E. M. Willemsen, Celia M. Antunes, Elena Molina, Joost J. Smit, Barbara Wróblewska, Harry J. Wichers, Edward F. Knol, Gregory S. Ladics, Raymond H. H. Pieters, Sandra Denery-Papini, Yvonne M. Vissers, Simona L. Bavaro, Colette Larré, Kitty C. M. Verhoeckx and Erwin L. Roggen
LINK
Introduction: Patients with cancer receiving radio- or chemotherapy undergo many immunological stressors. Chronic regular exercise has been shown to positively influence the immune system in several populations, while exercise overload may have negative effects. Exercise is currently recommended for all patients with cancer. However, knowledge regarding the effects of exercise on immune markers in patients undergoing chemo- or radiotherapy is limited. The aim of this study is to systematically review the effects of moderate- and high-intensity exercise interventions in patients with cancer during chemotherapy or radiotherapy on immune markers. Methods: For this review, a search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE, until March 2023. Methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro tool and best-evidence syntheses were performed both per immune marker and for the inflammatory profile. Results: Methodological quality of the 15 included articles was rated fair to good. The majority of markers were unaltered, but observed effects included a suppressive effect of exercise during radiotherapy on some proinflammatory markers, a preserving effect of exercise during chemotherapy on NK cell degranulation and cytotoxicity, a protective effect on the decrease in thrombocytes during chemotherapy, and a positive effect of exercise during chemotherapy on IgA. Conclusion: Although exercise only influenced a few markers, the results are promising. Exercise did not negatively influence immune markers, and some were positively affected since suppressed inflammation might have positive clinical implications. For future research, consensus is needed regarding a set of markers that are most responsive to exercise. Next, differential effects of training types and intensities on these markers should be further investigated, as well as their clinical implications.
In de openbare les van mijn collega lector Raymond Pieters, is het domein van het lectoraat ‘Innovative Testing in Life Sciences & Chemistry’ toegelicht. Kort samengevat richt dit lectoraat zich op de ontwikkeling en toepassing van innovatieve teststrategieën om geneesmiddelen, voedingsmiddelen of chemicaliën (stoffen) te beoordelen op hun werkzaamheid (effectiviteit) en veiligheid. De nadruk ligt op de ontwikkeling van snelle, kosteneffectieve testmethoden die een relevante voorspelling van effecten op de gezondheid van de mens en het milieu opleveren én waarbij geen of minder proefdieren worden gebruikt. In mijn les zal ik u laten zien waar proefdieren voor gebruikt worden. Hierbij zal ik mij voornamelijk richten op de Nederlandse situatie. Ik zal ingaan op de wetenschappelijke en maatschappelijke wens om minder proefdieren te gebruiken en op de vraag wat we verstaan onder ‘alternatieven voor dierproeven’. Daarna zal ik bespreken waarom er in Nederland en Europa recentelijk meer aandacht is voor dit onderwerp. Het overzicht zal niet uitputtend zijn, maar zal u een goede indruk geven van het landschap. Ook zal ik stil staan bij de vraag: Waarom zijn we tot nog toe zo weinig succesvol geweest op het gebied van alternatieven voor dierproeven? Wat zijn de obstakels en wat kunnen we hier van leren? Hoe zouden we in de praktijk de toepassing van alternatieven kunnen stimuleren? Wat moet er beter, en hoe gaan we dat doen? Als we slimmer willen testen moeten we de huidige grenzen verleggen, of beter over de grenzen van ons vakgebied heen kijken. Ik zal aangeven waar prioriteiten liggen en hoe we de meeste ‘winst’ kunnen behalen in termen van proefdiervermindering in relatie tot productinnovatie. Tot slot zal ik aangeven welke bruggen we moeten bouwen en wat de rol is van de Hogeschool Utrecht
