De hoofdvraag die beantwoord wordt in dit onderzoek is de volgende: Hoe kan de beleving van bezoekers van Nationaal Park Weerribben Wieden geoptimaliseerd worden in de verschillende fasen van de customer journey? De volgende sub vragen worden beantwoord in dit onderzoek: - Met welke touchpoints zijn de verschillende fasen van de customer journey ingericht? - Welke promotionele boodschap (motivaties en belevenissen) worden gecommuniceerd door middel van de touchpoints? - Welke touchpoints worden gebruikt door de bezoekers (dagbezoekers en verblijfstoeristen)? - Naar welke ervaringen/belevenissen is de bezoeker op zoek (motivaties)? Na het beantwoorden van de onderzoeksvragen worden aanbevelingen gedaan over de vraag hoe de touch points nog beter in te richten zijn om die beleving/ervaring verder te optimaliseren.
DOCUMENT
The promotor was Prof. Erik Jan Hultink and copromotors Dr Ellis van den Hende en Dr R. van der Lugt. The title of this dissertation is Armchair travelling the innovation journey. ‘Armchair travelling’ is an expression for travelling to another place, in the comfort of one’s own place. ‘The innovation journey’ is the metaphor Van de Ven and colleagues (1999) have used for travelling the uncharted river of innovation, the highly unpredictable and uncontrollable process of innovation. This research study began with a brief remark from an innovation project leader who sighed after a long and rough journey: ‘had I known this ahead of time…’. From wondering ‘what could he have known ahead of time?’ the immediate question arose: how do such innovation journeys develop? How do other innovation project leaders lead the innovation journey? And could I find examples of studies about these experiences from an innovation project leader’s perspective that could have helped the sighing innovation project leader to have known at least some of the challenges ahead of time? This dissertation is the result of that quest, as we do know relatively little how this process of the innovation project leader unfolds over time. The aim of this study is to increase our understanding of how innovation project leaders lead their innovation journeys over time, and to capture those experiences that could be a source for others to learn from and to be better prepared. This research project takes a process approach. Such an approach is different from a variance study. Process thinking takes into account how and why things – people, organizations, strategies, environments – change, act and evolve over time, expressed by Andrew Pettigrew (1992, p.10) as catching “reality in flight”.
MULTIFILE
Aan de hand van de ‘customer journey’ beschrijven we in dit rapport welke barrières mensen met een beperking ervaren voor, tijdens en na de reis en hoe de reisindustrie hierop kan inspelen. In dit rapport vatten we de belangrijkste bevindingen samen van vijf onderzoeksrapporten en ons literatuuronderzoek.
DOCUMENT
