We need educators to be constantly updating their skills and knowledge, and evidenced-informed practice is central to this; yet it is far from universal in our schools. Kristin Vanlommel and Chris Brown draw on their international research to show how EIP can be achieved based on three core principles. With this article, we consider the engagement by teachers and school leaders in educational practices that are ‘evidence-informed’ - across school systems and world-wide. There is a growing consensus that effective teaching and leadership is based on evidence-informed practice (or EIP), and that EIP results in improving student learning and achievement.
LINK
Digital innovation in education – as in any other sector – is not only about developing and implementing novel ideas, but also about having these ideas effectively used as well as widely accepted and adopted, so that many students can benefit from innovations improving education. Effectiveness, transferability and scalability cannot be added afterwards; it must be integrated from the start in the design, development and implementation processes, as is proposed in the movement towards evidence-informed practice (EIP). The impact an educational innovation has on the values of various stakeholders is often overlooked. Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is an approach to integrate values in technological design. In this paper we discuss how EIP and VSD may be combined into an integrated approach to digital innovation in education, which we call value-informed innovation. This approach not only considers educational effectiveness, but also incorporates the innovation’s impact on human values, its scalability and transferability to other contexts. We illustrate the integrated approach with an example case of an educational innovation involving digital peer feedback.
DOCUMENT
Evidence-informed change (EIC) has gained attention recently because it is seen as a lever to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of educational change. Important questions are: how is EIC conceptualized, what counts as evidence, and what factors can support EIC in practice? Because of the complexity of EIC, we aimed to understand these factors from a systems perspective. Different parts of the educational system (e.g. policy, practice of teachers’ and school leaders, research) are interrelated and need to be aligned for effective and sustainable change. Based on our scoping review we propose a model that conceptualizes EIC, identifies and defines different sources of evidence, and discusses influencing factors describing a system's readiness and capacity for EIC. Our results are an important step forward in understanding and supporting EIC in practice and developing targeted policy. This article also defines a common ground for future research, bringing together insights in an integrated framework of evidence-informed change.
LINK
Praktijkonderzoek over integratie van practice based evidence en evidence based practice, nderzoeksresultaten toepassen in de praktijk,verbeteren in en door de praktijk.
DOCUMENT
Educational Technology (EdTech) refers to digital tools designed to advance education by enhancing teaching and learning experiences and streamlining administrative tasks. These tools play an increasingly central role in education, transforming how students learn, teachers instruct, and institutions manage resources. An EdTech ecosystem includes various stakeholders such as students, educators, institutions, EdTech providers, investors, policymakers, and researchers3. Each stakeholder plays a crucial role: students and teachers utilise the technology, institutions drive adoption, EdTech providers and investors foster innovation, policymakers establish regulations, and researchers analyse the need, design, and effectiveness of tools to shape future developments. The Dutch 3E Framework offers an evidence-informed approach to evaluate the effectiveness of EdTech. A key feature of the framework is its emphasis on continuous evaluation rather than static, one-time validation, ensuring EdTech tools are improved over time. The framework is a step towards more effective technology integration in education by making evidence-informed decision-making (in the context of development, procurement and enhancement of EdTech) an accessible and actionable process. The primary aim of the Dutch 3E Framework is not to mandate evaluation for all tools but to promote a culture where evidence-informed decision-making is embedded in all EdTech-related processes. This framework serves as a practical guide on how evidence is generated, interpreted, and used to develop, procure, and improve EdTech effectively. The framework is expected to facilitate meaningful discussions within the Dutch education community about evidence-informed evaluation of EdTech and help navigate the complexities of technology integration in education. This framework was designed for Npuls
DOCUMENT
In the decision-making environment of evidence-based practice, the following three sources of information must be integrated: research evidence of the intervention, clinical expertise, and the patient’s values. In reality, evidence-based practice usually focuses on research evidence (which may be translated into clinical practice guidelines) and clinical expertise without considering the individual patient’s values. The shared decision-making model seems to be helpful in the integration of the individual patient’s values in evidence-based practice. We aim to discuss the relevance of shared decision making in chronic care and to suggest how it can be integrated with evidence-based practice in nursing. We start by describing the following three possible approaches to guide the decision-making process: the paternalistic approach, the informed approach, and the shared decision-making approach. Implementation of shared decision making has gained considerable interest in cases lacking a strong best-treatment recommendation, and when the available treatment options are equivalent to some extent. We discuss that in chronic care it is important to always invite the patient to participate in the decision-making process. We delineate the following six attributes of health care interventions in chronic care that influence the degree of shared decision making: the level of research evidence, the number of available intervention options, the burden of side effects, the impact on lifestyle, the patient group values, and the impact on resources. Furthermore, the patient’s willingness to participate in shared decision making, the clinical expertise of the nurse, and the context in which the decision making takes place affect the shared decision-making process. A knowledgeable and skilled nurse with a positive attitude towards shared decision making – integrated with evidence-based practice – can facilitate the shared decision-making process. We conclude that nurses as well as other health care professionals in chronic care should integrate shared decision making with evidence- based practice to deliver patient-centred care.
DOCUMENT
In de geestelijke gezondheidszorg wordt in toenemende mate wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan, vooral in het kader van opleidingen. Er is onbekendheid met de regelgeving en ethiek bij beginnend onderzoekers. Zorgvuldige overwegingen - conform de richtlijnen voor good clinical practice (gcp) en medisch-ethische toetsing, worden daardoor lang niet altijd gemaakt. DOEL Beschrijven van praktische handvatten en stimuleren van het medisch-ethische denken bij patiëntgebonden onderzoek in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg. METHODE In dit artikel wordt een op de praktijkbehoefte gebaseerd overzicht van praktische handvatten en ethische overwegingen gegeven. RESULTATEN Dit artikel benadrukt dat onderzoekers reeds vóór de start van het onderzoek belangrijke afwegingen dienen te maken. Instructies daarvoor en richtlijnen voor medisch-ethische toetsing zijn te vinden in: het richtsnoer voor good clinical practice, het stroomschema van de Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (ccmo) met de bijbehorende e-learningmodule en in de basiscursus ‘Regelgeving en organisatie voor klinisch onderzoekers’(brok). Praktische tips, geïllustreerd met voorbeelden, schetsen een kader om het medisch-ethisch denken te stimuleren. Tot slot is het van belang om de organisatorische inbedding van onderzoek in het kader van opleidingen te verbeteren. CONCLUSIE Basisinformatie over gcp en medisch-ethische toetsing bij patiëntgebonden onderzoek is via diverse kanalen beschikbaar. De uitdaging zit vooral in de inbedding van gcp in patiëntgebonden onderzoek door beginnend onderzoekers in de ggz.
DOCUMENT
Van deze publicatie is geen samenvatting beschikbaar
DOCUMENT
The model of the Best Practice Unit (BPU) is a specific form of practice based research. It is a variation of the Community of Practice (CoP) as developed by Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002) with the specific aim to innovate a professional practice by combining learning, development and research. We have applied the model over the past 10 years in the domain of care and social welfare in the Netherlands. Characteristics of the model are: the interaction between individual and collective learning processes, the development of (new or better) working methods, and the implementation of these methods in daily practice. Multiple knowledge sources are being used: experiential knowledge, professional knowledge and scientific knowledge. Research is serving diverse purposes: articulating tacit knowledge, documenting the learning and innovation process, systematically describing the revealed or developed ways of working, and evaluating the efficacy of new methods. An analysis of 10 different research projects shows that the BPU is an effective model.
DOCUMENT
De leidraad ondersteunt mbo-instellingen om zich tot lerende organisaties te ontwikkelen. In een mbo-school als lerende organisatie verbeteren docenten, opleidingsteams en schoolleiders hun onderwijs op een onderbouwde en duurzame manier. Door zich te verdiepen in bestaande kennis, ervaringen te delen, van elkaar te leren en samen te werken. Het doel van deze leidraad is om docenten, opleidingsteams en schoolleiders kennis en handvatten te bieden om zich tot een lerende organisatie te ontwikkelen. We verbinden kennis uit onderzoek aan kennis en ervaringen van docenten. Ook bieden we handvatten om de manier van duurzaam werken aan kwaliteitsverbetering te kunnen verankeren in de cultuur van de mbo-instelling. Aan de hand van de zes aanbevelingen in deze leidraad, werk je toe naar een lerende organisatie. In aanbeveling 1 en 2 focus je op het onderzoeksmatig en cyclisch werken aan onderwijsverbetering en in aanbeveling 3 t/m 6 werk je aan het creëren van een onderzoekscultuur: Kom tot een onderbouwd en gedragen verbeterplan Zorg voor een proces van uitvoeren, monitoren, bijstellen en borgen Stimuleer een onderzoekende houding Stimuleer samen leren in het team Benut kennis en expertise Creëer een schoolklimaat waarin leiderschap wordt gespreid
MULTIFILE
