Waarom voelen we afgrijzen voor de daden van Macbeth? Hebben we medelijden met Desdemona? Waarom reageren we emotioneel op situaties die we beschouwen als fictioneel, als niet-echt? Door een analyse van het receptieproces van toeschouwers bij theatrale producten (theater, film, televisie) wordt in dit boek een antwoord op deze vragen geformuleerd. Hiertoe worden begrippen als 'fictionaliteit', 'mogelijke werelden', 'beleving', 'identificatie' en 'empathie' vanuit een psychologische optiek geanalyseerd.In het bijzonder wordt stelling genomen tegen het idee dat het receptieproces hoofdzakelijk door bepaalde conventies wordt gestuurd. De analyse resulteert ineen psychologisch model dat een aantal cognitieve processen nauwkeurig beschrijft. Tevens wordt uitvoerig ingegaan op de emotionele relatie van de toeschouwer met het theatrale product. Empirisch onderzoek bevestigt het merendeel van de aan het model onttrokken hypothesen.
Head-mounted displays (HMDs) have been available for several years now, but uptake has been slow so far. The objective of this study was to gain insight into preferences on anticipated use in the early phase of HMDs with augmented reality. A survey was conducted among Dutch students following a nursing or social work education (N=100). Results showed that almost nobody had ever used a HMD. The areas of high interest of anticipated use of HMDs lies especially in receiving information regarding emergencies via the HMD if something is happening close to people's physical location and news and general information about physical location. For potential use functionalities, the most interesting functions reported by respondents were using HMDs for hands-free calling and receiving information about their behavioral patterns with regard to movement. The attitudes towards receiving non-visible cues in social interaction such as detecting stress levels or mood were all reported with a negative attitude. More than half of the respondents reported to have an intention to use a HMD in the future.
This paper explores inter-organisational relationships, in terms of cooperation, between three main types of sport providers at the local level: voluntary sport clubs, for-profit fitness and health clubs, and local sports authorities. Both withinand cross-sector cooperation are analysed and related to organisational characteristics as well as the perceived competition from other sport providers. Data are obtained from three quantitative panel surveys: the Flemish Sport Club Panel 2009, the Flemish Fitness Panel 2009, and the Flemish Local Sports Authorities Panel 2010. The results show that sport providers influence and are influenced by other sport providers in their environment. The three selected groups of sport providers differ with regard to the occurrence and the nature of the cooperation. Local sports authorities (i.e., public sector) are found to be the most cooperative sport provider. Evidence is provided for the use of cooperation as a strategy to meet competitive challenges.
LINK