PurposeThe majority of older patients, scheduled for a cardiac procedure, do not adhere to international dietary intake and physical activity guidelines. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators regarding dietary intake and physical activity behaviour change in older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients undergoing TAVI. Interviews were analysed by two independent researchers using thematic analysis, the capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour model was used as a framework.ResultsThe study included 13 patients (82 ± 6 years old, 6 females) until data saturation was reached. Six themes were identified, which were all applicable to both dietary intake and physical activity. Three following themes were identified as barriers: (1) low physical capability, (2) healthy dietary intake and physical activity are not a priority at an older age and (3) ingrained habits and preferences. Three following themes were identified as facilitators: (1) knowledge that dietary intake and physical activity are important for maintaining health, (2) norms set by family, friends and caregivers and (3) support from the social environment.ConclusionOur study found that older patients had mixed feelings about changing their behaviour. The majority initially stated that dietary intake and physical activity were not a priority at older age. However, with knowledge that behaviour could improve health, patients also stated willingness to change, leading to a state of ambivalence. Healthcare professionals may consider motivational interviewing techniques to address this ambivalence.
MULTIFILE
Background/purpose: For prevention of sarcopenia and functionaldecline in community-dwelling older adults, a higher daily proteinintake is needed. A new e-health strategy for dietary counselling wasused with the aim to increase total daily protein intake to optimallevels (minimal 1.2 g/kg/day, optimal 1.5 g/kg/day) through use ofregular food products.Methods: The VITAMIN (VITal Amsterdam older adults IN the city)RCT included 245 community-dwelling older adults (age ≥ 55y):control, exercise, and exercise plus dietary counselling (protein)group. The dietary counselling intervention was based on behaviourchange and personalization. Dietary intake was measured by a 3ddietary record at baseline, after 6-month intervention and 12-monthfollow-up. The primary outcome was average daily protein intake(g/kg/day). Sub-group analysis and secondary outcomes includeddaily protein distribution, sources, product groups. A Linear MixedModels (LMM) of repeated measures was performed with STATAv13.Results: Mean age of the 224 subjects was 72.0(6.5) years, a BMI of26.0(4.2). The LMM showed a significant effect of time and time*group(p<0.001). The dietary counselling group showed higher protein intakethan either control (1.41 vs 1.13 g/kg/day; β +0.32; p<0.001) or exercisegroup (1.41 vs 1.11 g/kg/day; β +0.33; p<0.001) after 6-month interventionand 12-month follow-up.Conclusions and implications: This study shows digitally supporteddietary counselling improves protein intake sufficiently in communitydwellingolder adults with use of regular food products. Protein intakeincrease by personalised counselling with e-health is a promising strategyfor dieticians.
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) comprises cardiometabolic risk factors frequently found in individuals with obesity. Guidelines to prevent or reverse MetS suggest limiting fat intake, however, lowering carbohydrate intake has gained attention too. The aim for this review was to determine to what extent either weight loss, reduction in caloric intake, or changes in macronutrient intake contribute to improvement in markers of MetS in persons with obesity without cardiometabolic disease. A meta-analysis was performed across a spectrum of studies applying low-carbohydrate (LC) and low-fat (LF) diets. PubMed searches yielded 17 articles describing 12 separate intervention studies assessing changes in MetS markers of persons with obesity assigned to LC (<40% energy from carbohydrates) or LF (<30% energy from fat) diets. Both diets could lead to weight loss and improve markers of MetS. Meta-regression revealed that weight loss most efficaciously reduced fasting glucose levels independent of macronutrient intake at the end of the study. Actual carbohydrate intake and actual fat intake at the end of the study, but not the percent changes in intake of these macronutrients, improved diastolic blood pressure and circulating triglyceride levels, without an effect of weight loss. The homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance improved with both diets, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol only improved in the LC diet, both irrespective of aforementioned factors. Remarkably, changes in caloric intake did not play a primary role in altering MetS markers. Taken together, these data suggest that, beyond the general effects of the LC and LF diet categories to improve MetS markers, there are also specific roles for weight loss, LC and HF intake, but not reduced caloric intake, that improve markers of MetS irrespective of diet categorization. On the basis of the results from this meta-analysis, guidelines to prevent MetS may need to be re-evaluated.
MULTIFILE
