In the Netherlands, there is an increasing need for collective forms of housing for older people. Such housing bridges the gap between the extremes of living in an institutionalised setting and remaining in their own house. The demand is related to the closure of many residential care homes and the need for social engagement with other residents. This study focuses on housing initiatives that offer innovative and alternative forms of independent living, which deviate from mainstream housing arrangements. It draws on recent literature on healthcare ‘rebels’ and further develops the concept of ‘rebellion’ in the context of housing. The main research question is how founders dealt with challenges of establishing and governing ‘rebellious’ innovative living arrangements for older people in the highly regulated context of housing and care in the Netherlands. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 17 founders (social entrepreneurs, directors and supervisory board members) were conducted. Founders encountered various obstacles that are often related to governmental and sectoral rules and regulations. Their stories demonstrate the opportunities and constraints of innovative entrepreneurship at the intersection of housing and care. The study concludes with the notion of ‘responsible rebellion’ and practical lessons about dealing with rules and regulations and creating supportive contexts. Original article at MDPI; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176235 And atachment "Supplementary Materials" (This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers "Age-Friendly Cities & Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives")
MULTIFILE
Ongelijke behandeling bij financieringsaanvragen en daarmee beperkte toegang tot financiering is voor vrouwelijke founders de belangrijkste barrière om te internationaliseren. Investeerders stellen vaak hun belang boven dat van de ondernemer en hebben een conservatieve insteek waar het gaat om investeren in bedrijven van vrouwelijke founders die internationaal willen groeien. In een vraagarticulatieproces gaven vrouwelijke founders aan dit als remmend ervaren: investeerders zouden vaak ‘een korte termijn visie hebben, en op vernuftige wijze, founders uit hun eigen bedrijf te ‘ontslaan’ en zelf verder gaan met het concept’. Dit vroegtijdig ‘ontzielen’ van bedrijven heeft op de lange termijn een averechts effect omdat deze bedrijven vaak niet succesvol blijken. Er is behoefte aan: 1. Inzicht in.de belangen van investeerders versus die van vrouwelijke founders 2. Meer bewustwording hoe er wordt aangekeken en omgegaan met vrouwelijke founders Daarom onderzoeken we: • De motieven van vrouwelijke ondernemers om internationaal te groeien • De knelpunten die zij ervaren bij het zoeken naar financiering/investeringen voor internationale groei • De motieven en belangen van investeerders om in vrouwelijke founders te investeren om de volgende onderzoeksvraag te beantwoorden: In hoeverre bestaat er een kloof tussen de belangen van vrouwelijke founders en die van investeerders? En daarmee : 1. Inzicht te ontwikkelen in de door vrouwelijke founders ervaren mismatch tussen hun belangen en die van investeerders 2. Een consortium voor een vervolgtraject te ontwikkelen dat voortbouwt op inzichten uit dit onderzoek om bovengenoemde mismatch op te lossen, 3. bijvoorbeeld door ontwikkeling van een "Gender due dilligence" met daarin nieuwe criteria die recht doen aan internationaliseringsambities van vrouwelijke founders. We sluiten aan bij de Kennis en Innovatieagenda van de missie Maatschappelijke Verdienvermogen en bouwen voor op eerder onderzoek van het HvA-brede lectoraat Entrepreneurship-. Het consortium bestaat uit Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Van Weerden BV en vertegenwoordigers van vrouwelijke ondernemersnetwerken, investeerders en investmentcoaches
Treatment of crops with insecticides remains essential because globally more than 75 billion dollars is lost through crop destruction by invasive insects. However it is accompanied by severe disadvantages including i. increasing resistance of the target insects against insecticides and ii. the undesired lethality of beneficial insects such as bees and other pollinator species. The significant reduction of insect species during the last years, at least partly caused by the presently available insecticides has also effects on insect-eating species. Last but not least the presence of residual amount of insecticides in the environment (soil and plants), because of poor (bio)degradation, is another distinct disadvantage. Therefore, the overall aim of this proposal is to design and synthesize peptide based biopesticides. This should lead to Nature inspired green alternatives for insect control because "Peptides" are the small equivalents of "proteins", that are biomolecules, which are universally present in all organisms and subject to their natural biodegradation mechanisms, as well as also chemically degraded in the soil (water, heat, UV, oxygen). Design and synthesis of these environmentally benign compounds will eventually take place in a founded company called "INNOVAPEPLINE". Evaluation of candidate peptide based biopesticides can be carried out in collaboration with a recently founded company (spin-out of the University of Glasgow) called "SOLASTA BIO" (founders professors Shireen Davies, Julian Dow and Rob Liskamp) and/or with other (third) parties such as the University of Wageningen. Upon recent identification of promising candidate compounds ("leads"), chemical optimization studies of leads will take place, followed by evaluation in field trials. In this proposal design, synthesis and chemical optimization of the biological activity of new peptides and development of methods to monitor their biodegradation rate will take place. Thereby expanding the repertoire of peptide based biopesticides. (292 words)
Various studies suggest that the fashion and textile industry need to move away from traditional, extractive leadership models. Dreier et al. (2019) show how traditional top-down, hierarchical leadership approaches are not effective in fostering sustainability, and argued that a more collaborative, participative approach is needed to implement true and long-standing change. Moreover, research also shows how fashion and textile designers don’t see themselves as leaders but instead as ‘creators’ who employ others to manage their business and lead the team. This change in leadership is also necessary to achieve the European vision for Industry 5.0 (2022), which places the wellbeing of the worker at the centre of the production process. If we want to find solutions to the problems we face today, we need to change the way we think, lead, and do business. This calls for regenerative leadership which involves not only minimising negative impacts, but also actively working to restore and enhance the social ecological systems in which an industry operates. And since technology has become ubiquitous in every aspect of our lives (including business), it is important to explore its role in helping us become better regenerative leaders. With ReLead, The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS) aims to amplify consortium partner i-did’s social and environmental impact. Since its inception in 2009, i-did has helped more than 400 people become gainfully employed while helping recycle almost 60.000 kgs of textile waste. This has been possible due to the transformation of i-did’s founder (Mireille Geijsen) from a creative designer, into a collaborative and mindful leader. The intended outcome of this project is to create a tech-enabled leadership transformation toolkit and leadership academy that helps creative designers transform into regenerative leaders.
