To reduce greenhouse gas emissions, countries around the world are pursuing electrification policies. In residential areas, electrification will increase electricity supply and demand, which is expected to increase grid congestion at a faster rate than grids can be reinforced. Battery energy storage (BES) has the potential to reduce grid congestion and defer grid reinforcement, thus supporting the energy transition. But, BES could equally exacerbate grid congestion. This leads to the question: What are the trade-offs between different battery control strategies, considering battery performance and battery grid impacts? This paper addresses this question using the battery energy storage evaluation method (BESEM), which interlinks a BES model with an electricity grid model to simulate the interactions between these two systems. In this paper, the BESEM is applied to a case study, wherein the relative effects of different BES control strategies are compared. The results from this case study indicate that batteries can reduce grid congestion if they are passively controlled (i.e., constraining battery power) or actively controlled (i.e., overriding normal battery operations). Using batteries to reduce congestion was found to reduce the primary benefits provided by the batteries to the battery owners, but could increase secondary benefits. Further, passive battery controls were found to be nearly as effective as active battery controls at reducing grid congestion in certain situations. These findings indicate that the trade-offs between different battery control strategies are not always obvious, and should be evaluated using a method like the BESEM.
DOCUMENT
Summary:A novel Smart Charging strategy, based on low base allowances per charger combined with 1. clustering of chargers on the same part of the grid and 2. dynamic non guaranteed allowance, is presented in this paper. This manner of Smart Charging will allow more than 3 times the amount of chargers to be installed in the existing grid, even when the grid is already congested. The system also improves the usage of available flexibility in EV charging compared to other Smart Charging strategies. The required algorithms are tested on public chargers in Amsterdam, in some of the most intensely used parts of the Dutch grid.
DOCUMENT
Based on the model outcomes, Houtlaan’s energy transition will likely result in congestion and curtailmentproblems on the local electricity grid within the next 5-7 years, possibly sooner if load imbalance between phasesis not properly addressed.During simulations, the issue of curtailment was observed in significant quantities on one cable, resulting in aloss of 8.292 kWh of PV production per year in 2030. This issue could be addressed by moving some of thehouses on the affects cable to a neighboring under-utilized cable, or by installing a battery system near the end ofthe affected cable. Due to the layout of the grid, moving the last 7 houses on the affected cable to the neighboringcable should be relatively simple and cost-effective, and help to alleviate issues of curtailment.During simulations, the issue of grid overloading occurred largely as a result of EV charging. This issue can bestbe addressed by regulating EV charging. Based on current statistics, the bulk of EV charging is expected to occurin the early evening. By prolonging these charge cycles into the night and early morning, grid overloading canlikely be prevented for the coming decade. However, such a control system will require some sort of infrastructureto coordinate the different EV charge cycles or will require smart EV chargers which will charge preferentiallywhen the grid voltage is above a certain threshold (i.e., has more capacity available).A community battery system can be used to increase the local consumption of produced electricity within theneighborhood. Such a system can also be complemented by charging EV during surplus production hours.However, due to the relatively high cost of batteries at present, and losses due to inefficiencies, such a systemwill not be financially feasible without some form of subsidy and/or unless it can provide an energy service whichthe grid operator is willing to pay for (e.g. regulating power quality or line voltage, prolonging the lifetime of gridinfrastructure, etc.).A community battery may be most useful as a temporary solution when problems on the grid begin to occur, untila more cost-effective solution can be implemented (e.g. reinforcing the grid, implementing an EV charge controlsystem). Once a more permanent solution is implemented, the battery could then be re-used elsewhere.The neighborhood of Houtlaan in Assen, the Netherlands, has ambitious targets for reducing the neighborhood’scarbon emissions and increasing their production of their own, sustainable energy. Specifically, they wish toincrease the percentage of houses with a heat pump, electric vehicle (EV) and solar panels (PV) to 60%, 70%and 80%, respectively, by the year 2030. However, it was unclear what the impacts of this transition would be onthe electricity grid, and what limitations or problems might be encountered along the way.Therefore, a study was carried out to model the future energy load and production patterns in Houtlaan. Thepurpose of the model was to identify and quantify the problems which could be encountered if no steps are takento prevent these problems. In addition, the model was used to simulate the effectiveness of various proposedsolutions to reduce or eliminate the problems which were identified
De verplichting in de Binnenvaart om haar emissies te reduceren leidt tot grote uitdagingen in de sector, omdat nieuwe technologie in bestaande schepen tot problemen leidt en vaak een te grote investering vraagt. VIV, de branchevereniging van inbouw-, reparatie- en revisiebedrijven, heeft zich uitgesproken voor het gebruik van hernieuwbare methanol. Het ontbreekt de bedrijven echter aan kennis en vaardigheid over de conversie van een bestaande dieselmotor naar hernieuwbare methanol. De methanol industrie, verenigd in het Methanol Institute, zet zich in voor het gebruik van methanol in de scheepvaart. In de Zeevaart is al ervaring opgedaan met hernieuwbare methanol, maar de schaal en technologie verschilt met die in onze Binnenvaart. VIV en het Methanol Institute hebben de HAN benaderd met de vraag om de kennis en vaardigheid in gebruik van hernieuwbare methanol in scheepsmotoren te vergroten. De HAN beantwoordt deze marktvraag in 4 werkpakketten waar het draait om de retrofit conversie van een bestaande binnenvaartaandrijving, op een praktisch toepasbare manier. Ze maakt hier een vertaalslag van de wetenschap en kennis bij grote zeevaartmotoren, naar het binnenvaart-MKB. Dit gebeurt door te onderzoeken binnen welke kaders, en met welke indicatoren tijdens het afstellen van een onderzoeksmotor, een optimale methanol dual-fuel motor opgezet kan worden. Het hoofddoel is het verhogen van de kennis en vaardigheid over dual-fuel motoren op Hernieuwbare Methanol in de reparatie- en revisiesector. Het Schoon Schip project combineert de opgedane kennis met kennis uit de academische wereld, en de motorervaring van alle partners, om tot een betrouwbare toepassing van methanol in de binnenvaart te komen. Het gaat er om tot een werkende praktijkoplossing te komen voor het gebruik van hernieuwbare methanol in de bestaande vloot van 12.000 binnenvaartschepen.
Making buildings smarter will save energy and make energy systems more flexible to address grid congestion. This is done by adding smart functionalities (such as machine learning and AI) to existing building management systems and by making full use of building data. Applied research and innovation on smart buildings is urgently needed to evaluate the best smart solutions for buildings applicable to different types of buildings across different contexts, and to assess their costs and benefits. Research on smart buildings, therefore, plays a large role in European, national and regional R&I agenda’s on energy, climate and digitalisation. Amsterdam University of Amsterdam (AUAS) has a growing research group on building energy management and smart buildings, supporting the sustainable transition of its own campus and the Amsterdam region. However, to date, AUAS has not been able to engage in international research projects in this area. Recently, AUAS became a partner in an European University Alliance (U!REKA European University), U!REKA comprises of six universities of applied sciences across Europe with its mission focusing on climate neutral communities and cities. Several partners with U!REKA are also conducting research on smart buildings and smart campuses, but, like AUAS, still in relative isolation. U!REKA will provide the collaboration framework for future joint research to be kick-started by the proposed SIA pilot project. In this research project, AUAS will cooperate with the Technical University Eindhoven, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences (Helsinki) and Politecnico de Lisboa (Lisbon) as consortium partners. Supporting partners are Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Technology (Stockholm) and TVVL (Dutch knowledge platform and association of professionals in the installation sector). The research is based on smart building case studies on the campuses of the project partners.
