As a consequence of climate change and urbanization, many cities will have to deal with more flooding and extreme heat stress. This paper presents a framework to maximize the effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) for flood risk reduction and thermal comfort enhancement. The framework involves an assessment of hazards with the use of models and field measurements. It also detects suitable implementation sites for NBS and quantifies their effectiveness for thermal comfort enhancement and flood risk reduction. The framework was applied in a densely urbanized study area, for which different small-scale urban NBS and their potential locations for implementation were assessed. The overall results show that the most effective performance in terms of flood mitigation and thermal comfort enhancement is likely achieved by applying a range of different measures at different locations. Therefore, the work presented here shows the potential of the framework to achieve an effective combination of measures and their locations, which was demonstrated on the case of the Sukhumvit area in Bangkok (Thailand). This can be particularly suitable for assessing and planning flood mitigation measures in combination with heat stress reduction.
DOCUMENT
Resilience is held as a promising concept to produce a paradigm shift from traditional flood control to an integration of flood risk management and spatial planning. Central ideas to the resilience narrative are that nothing is certain except uncertainty itself' and adaptability' is key to governing the unknown'. However, this terminology is far from clear, yet increasingly used, which raises the question how it is made sense of in practice. To answer this question, we examine two long-term flood risk management strategies in the London and Rotterdam region with a policy framing perspective (i.e. the English Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and the Dutch Delta Programme). In both strategies, uncertainties are a key concern, leading to adaptive strategic plans. Reconstructing the framing processes shows that the English adopted a scientific pragmatism' frame and the Dutch a joint fact-finding' frame. While this led to different governance approaches, there are also striking parallels. Both cases use established methods such as scenario planning and monitoring to manage' uncertainties. Similarly to previous turns in flood risk management, the resilience narrative seems to be accommodated in a technical-rational way, resulting in policy strategies that are maintaining the status quo rather than bringing about a paradigm shift.
DOCUMENT
The purpose of this paper is to propose a research by design strategy, focusing on the generation of innovative climate adaptation solutions by utilizing the Design Thinking Process. The proposed strategy has been developed and tested in a research and design studio, which took place in 2020 at a Master of Architecture degree program in the Netherlands. The studios focused on the sparsely populated, high flood risk region of the Lake District, UK. The Lake District faces urgent climate change challenges that demand effective solutions. On the other hand, the area is a UNESCO heritage site, characterized by massive tourism and tending towards museumification (sic). Three indicative design research projects were selected to illustrate the proposed research by design strategy. The results reveal that this strategy facilitates the iterative research by design process and hence offers a systematic approach to convert the threats of climate change into opportunities by unraveling the potentials of the study area. The findings lay the groundwork for more systematic studies on research by design as an effective strategy for climate change adaptation design. Beyond the local case, the results contribute to the critical theories on climate adaptation design and research by design methodologies.
DOCUMENT
‘Dieren in de dijk’ aims to address the issue of animal burrows in earthen levees, which compromise the integrity of flood protection systems in low-lying areas. Earthen levees attract animals that dig tunnels and cause damages, yet there is limited scientific knowledge on the extent of the problem and effective approaches to mitigate the risk. Recent experimental research has demonstrated the severe impact of animal burrows on levee safety, raising concerns among levee management authorities. The consortium's ambition is to provide levee managers with validated action perspectives for managing animal burrows, transitioning from a reactive to a proactive risk-based management approach. The objectives of the project include improving failure probability estimation in levee sections with animal burrows and enhancing risk mitigation capacity. This involves understanding animal behavior and failure processes, reviewing existing and testing new deterrence, detection, and monitoring approaches, and offering action perspectives for levee managers. Results will be integrated into an open-access wiki-platform for guidance of professionals and in education of the next generation. The project's methodology involves focus groups to review the state-of-the-art and set the scene for subsequent steps, fact-finding fieldwork to develop and evaluate risk reduction measures, modeling failure processes, and processing diverse quantitative and qualitative data. Progress workshops and collaboration with stakeholders will ensure relevant and supported solutions. By addressing the knowledge gaps and providing practical guidance, the project aims to enable levee managers to effectively manage animal burrows in levees, both during routine maintenance and high-water emergencies. With the increasing frequency of high river discharges and storm surges due to climate change, early detection and repair of animal burrows become even more crucial. The project's outcomes will contribute to a long-term vision of proactive risk-based management for levees, safeguarding the Netherlands and Belgium against flood risks.
Er wordt continu ‘reuzenarbeid’ verricht in het rivierengebied in het teken van hoogwaterbescherming, vaarwegbeheer, natuurontwikkeling en delfstoffenwinning. Bij veel van deze rivierprojecten maakt grondverzet het grootste deel uit. Het is onder andere bepalend voor de kosten, de CO2-footprint en de omgevingshinder van dergelijke projecten, en de ruimtelijke kwaliteit van het rivierlandschap. Slim omgaan met grond is daarom een sleutelfactor van duurzaam rivierbeheer. Het onderwerp heeft daarom een prominente plek in verschillende kennis- en innovatieagenda’s, zoals de KIA Landbouw, Voedsel en Water, de KIA Circulaire Economie, en de KIA van het Hoogwaterbeschermingsprogramma. Deze articuleren een behoefte aan praktijkgericht onderzoek dat bijdraagt aan verduurzaming en kostenreductie van grondverzet, zodat grondverzet in 2030 energieneutraal is, de kosten per m3 tussen 2020 en 2030 aanzienlijk gedaald zijn en dat er in 2030 een gezonde slibeconomie is voor circulair materiaalgebruik. Desondanks moet er nog heel wat water door de Rijn voordat bovenstaande ambities in de praktijk kunnen worden gehaald. Het doel van dit project is om praktische inzichten en tools voor duurzaam grondmanagement in riviergebieden te ontwikkelen. Een consortium van 22 partijen (publiek, privaat, kennis) zal onder leiding van HAN lectoraat Sustainable River Management praktijkgericht onderzoek doen ter ondersteuning van technisch managers, ontwerpers, risicomanagers, projectmanagers en beheerders van dijken en uiterwaarden. Door middel van o.a. materiaalonderzoek, ontwerpend onderzoek en evaluaties worden praktische handvatten ontwikkeld voor realisatiestrategieën voor grondstoffenwinning volgens het DNA van de rivier, en het bruikbaar maken van sediment en gebiedseigen grond voor toepassing in de dijkenbouw. Bovendien worden verbeterde werkwijzen en tools ontwikkeld voor het op riviertakniveau afstemmen van vraag en aanbod van delfstoffen in natuur- en dijkversterkingsprojecten in het rivierengebied. Hiermee levert het project een concrete bijdrage aan de invulling van het Grondstoffenakkoord en het Rijksprogramma ‘Nederland Circulair in 2050’.
