BackgroundSeveral conditions and diseases can result in speech problems that can have a negative impact on everyday functioning, referred to as communicative participation. Subjective problems with acquired speech problems are often assessed with the speech handicap index (SHI). To assess generic participation problems, the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation–Participation (USER-P) questionnaire is frequently used. The English questionnaire Communicative Participation Item Bank—short form (CPIB short form) is a 10-item valid, reliable instrument that assesses communicative participation. In the absence of a Dutch equivalent, translation and validation of the CPIB short form was required.AimsTo translate the CPIB short form into Dutch, and to determine its psychometric properties for the group of adults with speech problems resulting from a neurological aetiology or head and neck cancer.Methods & ProceduresTranslation of the CPIB short form was performed following the instructions of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC). In a cross-sectional multi-centre study, participants completed the Dutch CPIB short form together with the SHI and USER-P, and the CPIB a second time after 2 weeks. We assessed internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the CPIB. Construct validity was assessed based on correlations with SHI, USER-P and speech assessments.Outcomes & ResultsIn the validation study, 122 participants were included: 51 with dysarthria due to different neurological disorders, 48 with speech problems due to head and neck cancer treatment and 23 healthy controls. Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.962), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test–retest reliability was high 0.908 (95% CI = 0.870–0.935). Construct validity was supported by a strong correlation between the Dutch CPIB short form and the SHI total score (SHI total rs = 0.887) and a moderate correlation between the Dutch CPIB-10 and the USER-P subscales (USER-P Frequency rs = 0.365; USER-P restrictions and USER-P satisfaction rs = 0.546). A moderate correlation was found between the Dutch CPIB-10 and the speech performance assessments (degree of distortedness r = −0.0557; p ≤ 0.001; degree of intelligibility r = 0.0562).Conclusions & ImplicationsThe Dutch CPIB short form provides a valid and reliable tool for clinical practice and research purposes. It allows clinicians to start using this PROM in clinical and research practice to systematically investigate the impact of the speech problems on communicative participation in a Dutch-speaking population.What this paper addsWhat is already known on the subjectCommunicative participation allows people to take part in life situations, but can be affected by acquired speech problems. The CPIB is a patient-reported outcome measure for the assessment of this concept. For the English language the 46-item bank and a 10-item short form is available.What this paper adds to existing knowledgeThis paper describes the process of translation of the CPIB short form into Dutch, and confirms its reproducibility and validity.What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?With this validated Dutch version of the CPIB short form available, professionals can implement this tool in clinical and research practice to systematically evaluate communicative participation.
DOCUMENT
Purpose: This study aims to systematically identify items that measure commu-nicative participation from measurement instruments that measure (aspects of) communication and/or participation in children and adolescents (5–18 years old) with communication disorders, for developing an item bank. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase to search for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or parent reports measuring aspects of communication and/or participation in children and adolescents. The individual items of the included measurement instruments were reviewed on whether they measure communicative participation. The items were then classified into one of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for Children and Youth (World Health Organization, 2007) domains of activities and participation. Results: A total of 29 instruments were found, nine PROMs and 20 parent reports. One hundred forty-five items were identified that measure communica-tive participation. From these 145 items, 74 were retrieved from PROMs (51%), and 71 were retrieved from parent reports (49%). The majority of items were classified in ICF Domain 7, interpersonal interactions and relationships (73.8%), followed by Domain 8, major life areas (13.8%), and Domain 9, community, social, and civic life (8.3%). Only a few items were found in Domains 5 and 6, and none was found in Domains 1, 2, and 4. Conclusions: We identified 145 items potentially useful for developing an item bank addressing communicative participation in children and adolescents with communication disorders. However, item development in collaboration with the target population is needed to ensure that these items fully reflect the construct.
LINK
Purpose: This study aims to systematically identify items that measure comnicative participation from measurement instruments that measure (aspects communication and/or participation in children and adolescents (5–18 years with communication disorders, for developing an item bank. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE Embase to search for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or pareports measuring aspects of communication and/or participation in childand adolescents. The individual items of the included measurement instrumwere reviewed on whether they measure communicative participation. The itwere then classified into one of the International Classification of FunctioDisability and Health (ICF) for Children and Youth (World Health Organiza2007) domains of activities and participation. Results: A total of 29 instruments were found, nine PROMs and 20 preports. One hundred forty-five items were identified that measure communtive participation. From these 145 items, 74 were retrieved from PROMs (5and 71 were retrieved from parent reports (49%). The majority of items classified in ICF Domain 7, interpersonal interactions and relationships (73.8followed by Domain 8, major life areas (13.8%), and Domain 9, commsocial, and civic life (8.3%). Only a few items were found in Domains 5 and none was found in Domains 1, 2, and 4. Conclusions: We identified 145 items potentially useful for developing an bank addressing communicative participation in children and adolescents communication disorders. However, item development in collaboration with target population is needed to ensure that these items fully reflect the const.
DOCUMENT
Bij spraak-, taal-, stem- en gehoorproblemen wordt communiceren lastig. Dat heeft grote gevolgen voor de participatie van de persoon. In dit promotieonderzoek ontwikkelen we een instrument gericht op het meten van communicatieve participatie bij volwassenen met verschillende communicatieve problemen, die ook toegankelijk is voor mensen met afasie.
Bij afasie is spreken en begrijpen van taal lastig. Dat heeft grote gevolgen voor de participatie van de patiënt. In dit promotieonderzoek ontwikkelen we een meetinstrument gericht op communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie.Doel Er zijn in Nederland geen bruikbare instrumenten om communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie in kaart te brengen. Dit onderzoek heeft tot doel om zo'n instrument te ontwikkelen. We vertalen een itembank gericht op de communicatieve participatie bij mensen met afasie na niet aangeboren hersenletsel (NAH) en we ontwikkelen deze tot een betrouwbaar en valide meetinstrument. Resultaten Dit onderzoek loopt nog. Na afloop vind je hier de resultaten. Looptijd 01 september 2019 - 31 augustus 2023 Aanpak We vertalen de Communicative Participation Item Bank en ontwikkelen deze door. We gebruiken daarbij de methodologie van het internationale meetsysteem voor patiëntuitkomsten PROMIS. We maken de itembank afasievriendelijk op basis van criteria uit de literatuur. We onderzoeken alle klinimetrische meeteigenschappen volgens de COSMIN-methodologie.
Kinderen en jongeren met een communicatieve problemen kunnen belemmeringen ervaren in dagelijkse situaties die om communicatie vragen. Dit noemen we communicatieve participatie. Het is van meerwaarde om communicatieve participatie makkelijk en betrouwbaar te meten. Hierdoor kan de logopedist samen met de cliënt relevante behandeldoelen stellen en deze evalueren.
