In Nederland is er niet alleen een lerarentekort, er is ook een tekort aan masteropgeleide leraren. In de LO misschien nog wel meer dan bij andere vakken. Maar waarom zou je als leraar LO een master gaan doen, je hebt toch al een eerstegraadsbevoegdheid? |
DOCUMENT
In de master T&D speelt de dynamische systeemtheorie een belangrijke rol. Deze theorie stelt dat ontwikkeling in een dynamisch proces in interacties ontstaat. In optimale interacties ontstaan “talentmomenten”, waarin leraar en leerlingen een hoger niveau van presteren weten te bereiken. Kinderen interacteren met volwassenen, zoals ouders en andere bekenden, maar ook met professionals zoals leraren. De kwaliteit van de interactie wordt vergroot als volwassenen kinderen voldoende uitdagen, vertrouwen hebben in het kind, adequaat steunen en begeleiden en de ruimte creëren voor het kind om zelf op onderzoek uit te gaan. De module Opbrengsten gaat over het beschrijven en meten van leeruitkomsten in het onderwijs zoals dat vorm krijgt volgens de theorieën en methoden uit de modules Interactie en Leeromgeving om vervolgens iets met de verkregen informatie te doen. Je krijgt instrumenten aangereikt om de opbrengsten van je eigen onderwijs te evalueren volgens de visie waarop de Master T&D is gebaseerd. In deze visie ligt bijvoorbeeld besloten dat ieder kind talentvol wordt benaderd; een belangrijk uitvloeisel hiervan is dat je zowel klassenniveau als op leerlingniveau opbrengsten leert te zien en te meten.
DOCUMENT
Since 2000, all Dutch Universities of Professional Education are confronted with three major renewals. The first was the European agreement to implement the Bachelor-Master system in Higher Education. The second was the strong tendence to renew eduction towards Competence Based Education. The third renewal came from the decision of the ministery of Education to contract lectures (lectoren) and research networks (kenniskringen) to improve research competences among students. Basic idea behind the latest renewal was that if students from Universities of Professional Education bring in more knowledge in companies, during and after their study, this will stimulate the innovative power of Dutch small and medium enterprices (SME’s). Educational developers have been very bussy with these renewals. Under the cloak of national assurance guidelines and external panels of inspection many educational developers automatically tended to use the instrumental paradigm for many design contexts. In accordance with the research of Gustafson (1993) and Richey (1993) we raised questions about the relevance of the instrumental paradigm for educational design contexts, because often the means-end thinking of the instrumental approach have seemed to be out of place. This research project by Lappia, De Boer & Van Rennes took place in 2006 at INHOLLAND university of professional education in the western part of The Netherlands with four pilots at School of Technology, Social Work, Education and Economics. The researchers started from the assumption that improving competence-based internships could not been based on an instrumental paradigma, because of the lack of absolute standards and the need to support deliberation among stakeholders. The Design Science Approach of Van Aken (2004) and Andriessen (2004) was been used to reveal field-tested and grounded technological rules as design specifications for improvement tools. Beside that the research project used the communicative paradigm (Visscher-Voerman & Gustafson, 2004) to reach consensus among the practitioners, who accompanion students during their internships in organisations in order to achieve a growth of competences in the choosen working field. Participants in the research project were employees of the School of Education, The School of Technology and the School of Economics, the department of Education, Quality, Research and development (OKR). Conditions for participating in the project were that the Schools recognized the problems with implementing Competence Based Internship and the School had to set the employees whe participated in the project free for half a day during the project. The Schools as stakeholders in the project were primary interested in solution of their practical problem (practical stream). The department of Education, Quality, Research and development was interested in solution of the pratical problem for dissemination reasons, but would also learn new strategies for implementation (knowledge stream). Therefore was choosen to follow the Design Science Research Approach.
DOCUMENT
Docenten van Fontys Hogeschool Bedrijfsmanagement, Educatie en Techniek (BEnT) hebben geëxperimenteerd (Gorissen, 2014) met Flipping the Classroom in relatie tot de taxonomie van Bloom. Bij dit concept worden lage kennisniveaus uit deze taxonomie voor de les aangesproken en in de les worden hogere kennisniveaus aangesproken. Bij het herontwerp van hun lessen zijn docenten ondersteund door workshops, gegeven door Fontys Educatief Centrum (FEC). Het onderzoek geeft inzicht in de ervaringen van docenten als ze Flipping the Classroom toepassen en dient als input voor FEC zodat toekomstige workshops nog beter aansluiten bij behoeften van docenten. De hoofdvraag is: Wat zijn ervaringen van docenten en studenten van een HBO-instelling met het toepassen van de taxonomie van Bloom in relatie tot Flipping the Classroom? Hiervoor zijn drie deelonderzoeken uitgevoerd, te weten een kwalitatieve analyse van de lesvoorbereidingen en individuele interviews met docenten en een kwantitatief onderzoek onder studenten over de door hun gevolgde lessen via dit concept. Resultaten laten zien dat docenten het concept correct toepassen en ze hiervoor activerende werkvormen en ICT tools inzetten. Docenten zijn enthousiast over de toepassing ondanks dat herontwerp tijdrovend is. Studenten kenden het concept vooraf niet maar hérkenden het wel, zowel voorafgaand als in de les. Vanwege de lage respons onder studenten kan alleen een voorzichtige conclusie getrokken worden dat het concept bijdraagt aan betere verwerking van de leerstof en dat het vaker toegepast mag worden. De belangrijkste aanbevelingen zijn gericht op kennisdeling tussen docenten die dit concept (willen gaan) toepassen in het onderwijs en nader onderzoek naar de invloed op de leerprestaties van de studenten.
DOCUMENT
This technical report describes "validation of the 'Target system definition"
DOCUMENT
We assess the incidence of numeracy skills mismatch in five countries: Belgium, Chile, Italy, Netherlands, and the United States of America. To do this, we make use of a new approach (Brun-Schamme & Rey, 2021), namely by identifying someone as being mismatched if the score for numeracy skills is outside the interval [median – SD , median + SD]. We make use of the PIAAC dataset, collected by the OECD, a survey that measures adults’ proficiency in numeracy among other type of skills. We find that 14% of the workers are over-skilled, whereas 16% are under-skilled. Being over-skilled is more likely for men, younger age-groups, having a high level of education, using numeracy skills often at work, and having studied science, mathematics, and engineering.
DOCUMENT
This relationship between external knowledge providers, e.g. consultants and academic institutions, and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is a difficult one. SME entrepreneurs think external advice is expensive, not required and/or not useful. In this paper these arguments are explored against the specific characteristics of SMEs. The argument of price probably tells more about the consultants inability to quantify the returns on their advice than about the cost of their services. Support policies enable free consults for SMEs on numerous topics, but the use of these facilities is relatively low. The suggestion that SME entrepreneurs do not need external knowledge is contradicted by their own assessment of their qualities. Typically the entrepreneurs lack expertise in supporting business functions like HR, IT, Finance and Legal. In SMEs these blank spots are not compensated by specialist staff members because the of the scale of the organization. The argument that the advice of an external consultant is generally not useful raises the question whether the insights gained in several business sciences only apply to large companies. This seems unlikely. Given the characteristics of SMEs the difference is probably more the context in which the insights are applied than the content of the insights itself. From the analysis of the characteristics of SMEs the dominant influence of the person of the owner/director, together with the absence of specialist staff, appeared as two of the most significant differences between SMEs and large companies. Given the personal profiles of these owners/directors as studied by Blom (Blom, 2001), the external knowledge providers should realize the three ways in consulting. The first way is the way of thinking. For this way it was stated already that the content of business sciences is not likely to differ for SMEs. The second way, the way of working, represents for the way information is gathered and the entrepreneur and his staff is involved in the process of developing the advice. In this way the consultant should allow for interaction and should make it fun for the participants. In this aspect, the process approach of consulting shows promising. The third way, the way of communicating, represents the way the knowledge is transferred from the advisor to the entrepreneur. In this way it is crucial to acknowledge the different personal profiles of SME entrepreneurs and consultants and to adjust the communication accordingly. Taking the three ways into account, the conclusion could be that the transfer of knowledge should be more the sharing of experiences. The Chair of Management Consulting will adjust her activities to explore this insight further.
DOCUMENT
Paperbijdrage conferentie EARLI SIG 14, 11-14 september 2018, Genève Although professional performance at the workplace is essential in VET, little is known about what educators do when assessing students’ performance. This study aims to explore how workplace educators inform their judgements of students’ performance by looking at strategies and potentially influencing factors.
DOCUMENT
Symposiumbijdrage conferentie EARLI SIG 14, 11-14 september 2018, Genève Learning across the contexts of school and the workplace is highly relevant to the VET-sector. This contribution analyses these cross-contextual learning processes with three key issues in mind: (1) guidance by vocational educators, (2) assessment of students’ development and (3) design of VET-learning environments. Guidance, assessment and overarching VET-curriculum designs form the basis for constructive alignment as an approach to optimize conditions for high quality cross-contextual learning processes. We used the theoretical framework of boundary crossing to clarify the complex, multilevel nature of these key issues.
DOCUMENT
Paperbijdrage conferentie EARLI SIG 14, 11-14 september 2018, Genève Universities of Applied Sciences (UAS) that offer Professional Studies (PS) are required to educate students to become starting professionals with research competence, that enable them to deal with challenging tasks that professionals face in a dynamic knowledge society (e.g. Heggen, Karseth, & Kyvik, 2010). To assess professional and research competence, students at UAS in the Netherlands mostly develop a professional product for an external bidder as their graduation project. The professional product is an artefact that is ideally representative for students’ future professions within a specific domain, e.g. a strategic advice within the economic domain (e.g. Losse, 2016). Due to the integrative and complex character of this task, supervision is essential and we thus need to understand what expertise supervisors need and which are good pedagogic strategies. However, little is known about graduation project supervision at UAS. This literature review aims at providing knowledge about graduation project supervision and at revealing what further inquiry on graduation project supervision should aim at, by answering the following questions: 1. What expertise do supervisors need and what is known about pedagogic strategies in graduation project supervision at UAS? 2. What should further inquiry after graduation project supervision at UAS aim at?
DOCUMENT
