In most countries, maternal and newborn care is fragmented and focused on identification and treatment of pathology that affects only the minority of women and babies. Recently, a framework for quality maternal and newborn care was developed, which encourages a system-level shift to provide skilled care for all.This care includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen women’s capabilities and focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes while ensuring access to emergency treatment when needed. Midwifery care is pivotal in this framework, which contains several elements that resonate with the main dimensions of primary care. Primary health care is the first level of contact with the health system where most of the population’s curative and preventive health needs can be fulfilled as close as possible to where people live and work. In this paper, we argue that midwifery as described in the framework requires the application of a primary care philosophy for all childbearing women and infants. Evaluation of the implementation of the framework should therefore include tools to monitor the performance of primary midwifery care.
MULTIFILE
Zorgcapaciteit kan een belangrijke schakel zijn tussen multi-probleem omstandigheden en ongunstige ontwikkeling van kinderen. Deze studie heeft als doel om de zorgcapaciteit en de correlaties daartussen te onderzoeken in zeer kwetsbare multiprobleemgezinnen in Rotterdam, Nederland. Zorgcapaciteit (algemeen, emotioneel en instrumenteel) werd prospectief beoordeeld bij 83 zeer kwetsbare vrouwen met behulp van video-observaties van dagelijkse zorgtaken, zes weken postpartum. Ondersteunende gegevens werden verzameld op drie tijdstippen: bij inclusie, zes weken na inclusie en zes weken postpartum, en deze omvatten psychologische symptomen, zelfredzaamheid, problematische levensdomeinen, thuisomgeving, inkomen, depressie, angst en stress. Zwangerschaps- en bevallingsgerelateerde informatie werd verzameld bij verloskundigen. De scores voor zorgverlening door de moeder waren gemiddeld van onvoldoende kwaliteit. Moeders die in een onveilige thuisomgeving leefden (B = 0,62) en moeders met meer problematische levensdomeinen (≤3 domeinen, B = 0,32) vertoonden significant hogere instrumentele zorgcapaciteiten. Andere variabelen waren niet gerelateerd aan zorgcapaciteit. De zorgcapaciteit in deze zeer kwetsbare populatie was van onvoldoende kwaliteit. In de meeste gevallen was er echter geen significant verband tussen zorgzaamheid en de variabelen die gerelateerd zijn aan kwetsbaarheid. Dit betekent dat een mogelijk verband tussen kwetsbaarheid en zorgcapaciteit kan worden veroorzaakt door de interactie tussen verschillende problemen, in plaats van door het type of de omvang van de zorg.
MULTIFILE
Background Variations in childbirth interventions may indicate inappropriate use. Most variation studies are limited by the lack of adjustments for maternal characteristics and do not investigate variations in adverse outcomes. This study aims to explore regional variations in the Netherlands and their correlations with referral rates, birthplace, interventions, and adverse outcomes, adjusted for maternal characteristics. Methods In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, using a national data register, intervention rates were analysed between twelve regions among single childbirths after 37 weeks’ gestation in 2010–2013 (n = 614,730). These were adjusted for maternal characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. Primary outcomes were intrapartum referral, birthplace, and interventions used in midwife- and obstetrician-led care. Correlations both between primary outcomes and between adverse outcomes were calculated with Spearman’s rank correlations. Findings Intrapartum referral rates varied between 55–68% (nulliparous) and 20–32% (multiparous women), with a negative correlation with receiving midwife-led care at the onset of labour in two-thirds of the regions. Regions with higher referral rates had higher rates of severe postpartum haemorrhages. Rates of home birth varied between 6–16% (nulliparous) and 16–31% (multiparous), and was negatively correlated with episiotomy and postpartum oxytocin rates. Among midwife-led births, episiotomy rates varied between 14–42% (nulliparous) and 3–13% (multiparous) and in obstetrician-led births from 46–67% and 14–28% respectively. Rates of postpartum oxytocin varied between 59–88% (nulliparous) and 50–85% (multiparous) and artificial rupture of membranes between 43–52% and 54–61% respectively. A north-south gradient was visible with regard to birthplace, episiotomy, and oxytocin. Conclusions Our study suggests that attitudes towards interventions vary, independent of maternal characteristics. Care providers and policy makers need to be aware of reducing unwarranted variation in birthplace, episiotomy and the postpartum use of oxytocin. Further research is needed to identify explanations and explore ways to reduce unwarranted intervention rates.
