Description: The Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS or NPAD) is a questionnaire aiming to quantify neck pain and disability.1 It is a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with any type of neck pain, of any duration, with or without injury.1,2 It consists of 20 items: three related to pain intensity, four related to emotion and cognition, four related to mobility of the neck, eight related to activity limitations and participation restrictions and one on medication.1,3 Patients respond to each item on a 0 to 5 visual analogue scale of 10 cm. There is also a nine-item short version.4 Feasibility: The NPDS is published and available online (https://mountainphysiotherapy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Neck-Pain-and-Disability-Scale.pdf).1 The NPDS is an easy to use questionnaire that can be completed within 5 to 8 minutes.1,5 There is no training needed to administer the instrument but its validity is compromised if the questionnaire must be read to the patient.2 Higher scores indicate higher severity (0 for normal functioning to 5 for the worst possible situation ‘your’ pain problem has caused you).2 The total score is the sum of scores on the 20 items (0 to 100).1 The maximum acceptable number of missing answers is three (15%).4 Two studies found a minimum important change of 10 points (sensitivity 0.93; specificity 0.83) and 11.5 points (sensibility 0.74; specificity 0.70), respectively.6,7 The NPDS is available in English, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Hindi, Iranian, Korean, Turkish, Japanese and Thai. Reliability and validity: Two systematic reviews have evaluated the clinimetric properties of 11 of the translated versions.5,8 The Finnish, German and Italian translations were particularly recommended for use in clinical practice. Face validity was established and content validity was confirmed by an adequate reflection of all aspects of neck pain and disability.1,8 Regarding structural validity, the NPDS is a multidimensional scale, with moderate evidence that the NPDS has a three-factor structure (with explained variance ranging from 63 to 78%): neck dysfunction related to general activities; neck pain and neck-specific function; and cognitive-emotional-behavioural functioning. 4,5,9 A recent overview of four systematic reviews found moderate-quality evidence of high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 for the various factors).10 Excellent test-retest reliability was found (ICC of 0.97); however, the studies were considered to be of low quality.3,10 Construct validity (hypotheses-testing) seems adequate when the NPDS is compared with the Neck Disability Index and the Global Assessment of Change with moderate to strong correlations (r = 0.52 to 0.86), based on limited moderate-quality studies.3,11,12 One systematic review reported good responsiveness to change in patients (r = 0.59).12
DOCUMENT
Purpose To empirically define the concept of burden of neck pain. The lack of a clear understanding of this construct from the perspective of persons with neck pain and care providers hampers adequate measurement of this burden. An additional aim was to compare the conceptual model obtained with the frequently used Neck Disability Index (NDI). Methods Concept mapping, combining qualitative (nominal group technique and group consensus) and quantitative research methods (cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling), was applied to groups of persons with neck pain (n = 3) and professionals treating persons with neck pain (n = 2). Group members generated statements, which were organized into concept maps. Group members achieved consensus about the number and description of domains and the researchers then generated an overall mind map covering the full breadth of the burden of neck pain. Results Concept mapping revealed 12 domains of burden of neck pain: impaired mobility neck, neck pain, fatigue/concentration, physical complaints, psychological aspects/consequences, activities of daily living, social participation, financial consequences, difficult to treat/difficult to diagnose, difference of opinion with care providers, incomprehension by social environment, and how person with neck pain deal with complaints. All ten items of the NDI could be linked to the mind map, but the NDI measures only part of the burden of neck pain. Conclusion This study revealed the relevant domains for the burden of neck pain from the viewpoints of persons with neck pain and their care providers. These results can guide the identification of existing measurements instruments for each domain or the development of new ones to measure the burden of neck pain.
DOCUMENT
Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment often leads to physical and psychosocial impairments. Rehabilitation can overcome these limitations and improve quality of life. The aim of this study is to obtain an overview of rehabilitation care for HNC, and to investigate factors influencing rehabilitation provision, in Dutch HNC centers, and to some extent compare it to other countries. Methods: An online survey, covering five themes: organizational structure; rehabilitation interventions; financing; barriers and facilitators; satisfaction and future improvements, among HNC healthcare- and financial professionals of Dutch HNC centers. Results: Most centers (86%) applied some type of rehabilitation care, with variations in organizational structure. A speech language therapist, physiotherapist and dietitian were available in all centers, but other rehabilitation healthcare professionals in less than 60%. Facilitators for providing rehabilitation services included availability of a contact person, and positive attitude, motivation, and expertise of healthcare professionals. Barriers were lack of reimbursement, and patient related barriers including comorbidity, travel (time), low health literacy, limited financial capacity, and poor motivation. Conclusion: Although all HNC centers included offer rehabilitation services, there is substantial practice variation, both nationally and internationally. Factors influencing rehabilitation are related to the motivation and expertise of the treatment team, but also to reimbursement aspects and patient related factors. More research is needed to investigate the extent to which practice variation impacts individual patient outcomes and how to integrate HNC rehabilitation into routine clinical pathways.
MULTIFILE
Betonprinten biedt veel nieuwe mogelijkheden op het gebied van productie en materiaal, maar vraagt van het MKB en startups flinke investeringen in kennis en middelen om er mee aan de slag te gaan. Met name slicer software, dat 3D modellen omzet naar printercode, vormt een bottleneck omdat deze alleen commercieel en printer-specifiek verkrijgbaar zijn. Saxion, Vertico en White Lioness willen in dit project de haalbaarheid van gratis open source slicer software die als cloud dienst wordt aangeboden onderzoeken. Deze oplossing maakt betonprinten bereikbaar voor meer innovatieve toepassingen vanuit MKB en startups, en vormt een platform voor het verzamelen en delen van kennis op het gebied van betonprinten.
3D-printen is inmiddels een volwassen productietechniek en wordt ook steeds meer ingezet voor medische toepassingen, omdat het voor medisch specialisten steeds meer vanzelfsprekend wordt dat zorg wordt afgestemd op de behoeften en wensen van de patiënt. Ook de therapeutische wereld volgt deze ontwikkelingen en willen hier meer mee doen, om zo hun patiënten optimaal te kunnen helpen. De bottlenecks voor het daadwerkelijk implementeren van 3D-printen in het alledaagse proces van de podotherapeut zitten voornamelijk in de kostprijs, snelheid van produceren, beperking aan goede materialen en de onmogelijkheid om de geprinte zool nadien aan te passen. Daarnaast zorgt de diversiteit aan mogelijkheden voor een diffuus beeld voor de podotherapeutische bedrijven omtrent wat nu de juiste productietechniek en het juiste materiaal is om te gebruiken. De praktijkvraag die in dit project beantwoord wordt is: In welke situatie is welke materiaal-productieproces combinatie van de 3D-printtechniek geschikt voor podotherapeutische zolen? Middels gebruiksonderzoek en scenario’s worden de eisen en wensen van de podotherapeuten achterhaald, welke worden gekoppeld aan de uitkomsten van het literatuuronderzoek. Deze ontwerp-proces-materiaal-combinaties worden experimenteel getest en verbeterd. Aan de hand van de uitkomsten worden ontwerp-afhankelijke richtlijnen opgesteld voor de podotherapeuten om zo een goede materiaal-proces selectie te kunnen maken voor het gebruik van 3D-printen voor podotherapeutische zolen.
Relatie tussen spiermassa en vroegtijdig stoppen van chemotherapie bij patienten met hoofd-halskankerIn this study, we aim to assess whether low pre-treatment muscle mass, measured with CT at thoracic (T4) or lumbar level (L3) is associated with early termination of chemotherapy related to toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.
