Most nurse leadership studies have concentrated on a classical, heroic, and hierarchical view of leadership. However, critical leadership studies have argued the need for more insight into leadership in daily nursing practices. Nurses must align their professional standards and opinions on quality of care with those of other professionals, management, and patients. They want to achieve better outcomes for their patients but also feel disciplined and controlled. To deal with this, nurses challenge the status quo by showing rebel nurse leadership. In this paper, we describe 47 nurses’ experiences with rebel nurse leadership from a leadership-as-practice perspective. In eight focus groups, nurses from two hospitals and one long-term care organization shared their experiences of rebel nurse leadership practices. They illustrated the differences between “bad” and “good” rebels. Knowledge, work experience, and patient-driven motivation were considered necessary for “good” rebel leadership. The participants also explained that continuous social influencing is important while exploring and challenging the boundaries set by colleagues and management. Credibility, trust, autonomy, freedom, and preserving relationships determined whether rebel nurses acted visibly or invisibly. Ultimately, this study refines the concept of rebel nurse leadership, gives a better understanding of how this occurs in nursing practice, and give insights into the challenges faced when studying nursing leadership practices.
MULTIFILE
Objectives To determine nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care for community-living older people. Nurse-sensitive outcomes are defined as patient outcomes that are relevant based on nurses’ scope and domain of practice and that are influenced by nursing inputs and interventions. Design A Delphi study following the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with two rounds of data collection. Setting District nursing care in the community care setting in the Netherlands. Participants Experts with current or recent clinical experience as district nurses as well as expertise in research, teaching, practice, or policy in the area of district nursing. Main outcome measures Experts assessed potential nurse-sensitive outcomes for their sensitivity to nursing care by scoring the relevance of each outcome and the ability of the outcome to be influenced by nursing care (influenceability). The relevance and influenceability of each outcome were scored on a nine-point Likert scale. A group median of 7 to 9 indicated that the outcome was assessed as relevant and/or influenceable. To measure agreement among experts, the disagreement index was used, with a score of <1 indicating agreement. Results In Delphi round two, 11 experts assessed 46 outcomes. In total, 26 outcomes (56.5%) were assessed as nurse-sensitive. The nurse-sensitive outcomes with the highest median scores for both relevance and influenceability were the patient’s autonomy, the patient’s ability to make decisions regarding the provision of care, the patient’s satisfaction with delivered district nursing care, the quality of dying and death, and the compliance of the patient with needed care. Conclusions This study determined 26 nurse-sensitive outcomes for district nursing care for community-living older people based on the collective opinion of experts in district nursing care. This insight could guide the development of quality indicators for district nursing care. Further research is needed to operationalise the outcomes and to determine which outcomes are relevant for specific subgroups.
DOCUMENT
Background: Nurse-sensitive indicators and nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care are two commonly used ways to measure quality of nursing care. However, little is known about the relationship between these kinds of measures. This study aimed to examine concordance between nurse-sensitive screening indicators and nurse-perceived quality of care. Methods: To calculate a composite performance score for each of six Dutch non-university teaching hospitals, the percentage scores of the publicly reported nurse-sensitive indicators: screening of delirium, screening of malnutrition, and pain assessments, were averaged (2011). Nurse-perceived quality ratings were obtained from staff nurses working in the same hospitals by the Dutch Essentials of Magnetism II survey (2010). Concordance between the quality measures was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Results: The mean screening performances ranged from 63 % to 93 % across the six hospitals. Nurse-perceived quality of care differed significantly between the hospitals, also after adjusting for nursing experience, educational level, and regularity of shifts. The hospitals with high-levels of nurse-perceived quality were also high-performing hospitals according to nurse-sensitive indicators. The relationship was true for high-performing as well as lower-performing hospitals, with strong correlations between the two quality measures (r S = 0.943, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our findings showed that there is a significant positive association between objectively measured nurse sensitive screening indicators and subjectively measured perception of quality. Moreover, the two indicators of quality of nursing care provide corresponding quality rankings. This implies that improving factors that are associated with nurses’ perception of what they believe to be quality of care may also lead to better screening processes. Although convergent validity seems to be established, we emphasize that different kinds of quality measures could be used to complement each other, because various stakeholders may assign different values to the quality of nursing care.
DOCUMENT
Worldwide, coral reefs are rapidly declining due to increased sea water temperatures and other environmental stresses (Figure 1). To counter the extinction of major coral reef building species on the island of Bonaire, the non-profit organization Reef Renewal Foundation Bonaire is restoring degraded reef sites using corals that are grown in local nurseries. In these nurseries, corals are propagated on artificial trees using fragmentation. After 6-8 months of growth in the nursery, the corals are transplanted to degraded reef sites around the island. Over the years more than 21.000 corals have been outplanted to reef restoration sites in this way. These corals show high survivorship under natural reef conditions but remain under threat by environmental disturbances, such as increased water temperatures, diseases, and competition with macroalgae. A promising intervention to increase reef persistence and resilience is to manipulate the coral-associated microbiome. At present, the composition of the microbiome in nursery-reared and outplanted corals on Bonaire is unknown. The aim of the current project is to identify and isolate naturally occurring beneficial bacteria that may stimulate the resilience of these corals. Our key objectives are: 1) to assess the presence of functionally beneficial bacteria in corals in nursery and restoration sites on Bonaire using metagenomic screening. 2) to design culture strategies to isolate these functionally beneficial bacteria. In the future, a selection of these beneficial bacteria can be applied to the corals to increase their resilience against environmental disturbances.
De administratieve en registratiewerklast op verpleegafdelingen in ziekenhuizen is hoog. Hierdoor besteden verpleegkundigen slechts een derde van hun dienst direct aan de patiënt waardoor zij plezier in hun werk verliezen. Er is een scala aan arbeidsbesparende technologie voor verpleegkundigen ontwikkeld. Slechts 30% daarvan is succesvol geïmplementeerd, onder andere door gebrek aan afstemming tussen innovatie, verpleegkundigen, werkprocessen en bestaande (informatie)systemen. Idealiter worden deze perspectieven geïntegreerd in één integrale, systemische ontwerpaanpak die tot op heden ontbreekt. Het UMC Utrecht benaderde daarom de Hogeschool Utrecht met de vraag: Hoe kan niet-direct zorggerelateerde technologie* zodanig ontworpen worden dat verpleegkundigen meer voldoening krijgen in hun werk (en meer tijd en aandacht hebben voor directe zorggerelateerde taken)? Door het combineren van onderzoeksmethoden uit de wereld van co-design, procesanalyse en systemisch ontwerp wordt op vier verpleegafdelingen in het UMC Utrecht en zeven verpleegafdelingen in het Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis met verpleegkundigen gezocht naar aangrijpingspunten in het verpleegkundig werkproces voor het verlagen van de werklast. Vervolgens wordt een aantal innovaties (her)ontworpen en getest. Hierbij worden Hogeschool Utrecht en de twee ziekenhuizen ondersteund door Panton, Pontes, Ucreate en Ascom. Het intensief in het ontwerpproces betrekken van verpleegkundigen zal dit project twee of drie toepasbare en ‘gedragen’ arbeidsbesparende producten en/of diensten opleveren (bijvoorbeeld een slim verpleegkundig oproepsysteem). Het selecteren, (door)ontwikkelen, combineren, toepassen en volgen van de diverse methodes bij het ontwikkelen van de arbeidsbesparende producten en/of diensten zal resulteren in een integrale ontwerpaanpak voor verpleegkundige innovaties, bedoeld voor ontwerpers in de zorg. Ook ontstaat een aanvulling op het beroepsprofiel voor de verpleegkundige in 2020 van Verpleegkundigen & Verzorgenden Nederland (projectpartner) dat stelt dat verpleegkundigen niet alleen technologie moeten kunnen gebruiken maar ook bij kunnen dragen aan het verbeteren ervan.
De druk op de wijkverpleging neemt toe. Zelfredzaamheid van cliënten kan deze druk verlichten, maar zorgprofessionals krijgen onvoldoende steun om dit te bereiken. Data Nurse ondersteunt verpleegkundigen op een datagedreven manier door waardevolle inzichten uit cliëntendossiers te benutten om de zelfredzaamheid van cliënten te vergroten en de zorg te verbeteren.
