Background: Nurse-sensitive indicators and nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care are two commonly used ways to measure quality of nursing care. However, little is known about the relationship between these kinds of measures. This study aimed to examine concordance between nurse-sensitive screening indicators and nurse-perceived quality of care. Methods: To calculate a composite performance score for each of six Dutch non-university teaching hospitals, the percentage scores of the publicly reported nurse-sensitive indicators: screening of delirium, screening of malnutrition, and pain assessments, were averaged (2011). Nurse-perceived quality ratings were obtained from staff nurses working in the same hospitals by the Dutch Essentials of Magnetism II survey (2010). Concordance between the quality measures was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Results: The mean screening performances ranged from 63 % to 93 % across the six hospitals. Nurse-perceived quality of care differed significantly between the hospitals, also after adjusting for nursing experience, educational level, and regularity of shifts. The hospitals with high-levels of nurse-perceived quality were also high-performing hospitals according to nurse-sensitive indicators. The relationship was true for high-performing as well as lower-performing hospitals, with strong correlations between the two quality measures (r S = 0.943, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our findings showed that there is a significant positive association between objectively measured nurse sensitive screening indicators and subjectively measured perception of quality. Moreover, the two indicators of quality of nursing care provide corresponding quality rankings. This implies that improving factors that are associated with nurses’ perception of what they believe to be quality of care may also lead to better screening processes. Although convergent validity seems to be established, we emphasize that different kinds of quality measures could be used to complement each other, because various stakeholders may assign different values to the quality of nursing care.
Background: Patient involvement in interprofessional education (IPE) is a new approach in fostering person-centeredness and collaborative competencies in undergraduate students. We developed the Patient As a Person (PAP-)module to facilitate students in learning from experts by experience (EBEs) living with chronic conditions, in an interprofessional setting. This study aimed to explore the experiences of undergraduate students, EBEs and facilitators with the PAP-module and formulate recommendations on the design and organization of patient involvement in IPE. Methods: We collected data from students, EBEs and facilitators, through eight semi-structured focus group interviews and two individual interviews (N = 51). The interviews took place at Maastricht University, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences and Regional Training Center Leeuwenborgh. Conventional content analysis revealed key themes. Results: Students reported that learning from EBEs in an interprofessional setting yielded a more comprehensive approach and made them empathize with EBEs. Facilitators found it challenging to address multiple demands from students from different backgrounds and diverse EBEs. EBEs were motivated to improve the personcentredness of health care and welcomed a renewed sense of purpose. Conclusions: This study yielded six recommendations: (a) students from various disciplines visit an EBE to foster a comprehensive approach, (b) groups of at least two students visit EBEs, (c) students may need aftercare for which facilitators should be receptive, (d) EBEs need clear instruction on their roles, (e) multiple EBEs in one session create diversity in perspectives and (f) training programmes and peer-to-peer sessions for facilitators help them to interact with diverse students and EBEs.
Rationale, aims and objective: Primary Care Plus (PC+) focuses on the substitution of hospital-based medical care to the primary care setting without moving hospital facilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether population health and experience of care in PC+ could be maintained. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and experienced quality of care from a patient perspective were compared between patients referred to PC+ and to hospital-based outpatient care (HBOC). Methods: This cohort study included patients from a Dutch region, visiting PC+ or HBOC between December 2014 and April 2018. With patient questionnaires (T0, T1 and T2), the HRQoL and experience of care were measured. One-to-two nearest neighbour calliper propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for potential selection bias. Outcomes were compared using marginal linear models and Pearson chi-square tests. Results: One thousand one hundred thirteen PC+ patients were matched to 606 HBOC patients with well-balanced baseline characteristics (SMDs <0.1). Regarding HRQoL outcomes, no significant interaction terms between time and group were found (P > .05), indicating no difference in HRQoL development between the groups over time. Regarding experienced quality of care, no differences were found between PC+ and HBOC patients. Only travel time was significantly shorter in the HBOC group (P ≤ .001). Conclusion: Results show equal effects on HRQoL outcomes over time between the groups. Regarding experienced quality of care, only differences in travel time were found. Taken as a whole, population health and quality of care were maintained with PC+ and future research should focus more on cost-related outcomes.
In dit project werkt het lectoraat ‘Bewegen, gezondheid en welzijn’ samen met de Hogeschool Arnhem Nijmegen, Hogeschool Zuyd, de Vrije Universiteit, de Universiteit van Maastricht, het UMC Groningen, drie GGZ instellingen (Universitair Centrum Psychiatrie Groningen (UCP), GGZ Friesland en GGZ Drenthe), de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychomotorische Therapie en het Landelijk Platform Geestelijke Gezondheidzorg (LPGGZ, nu ook MIND). De projectdoelstelling is: Het verwerven van nieuwe kennis over de ontwikkeling en implementatie van specifieke uitkomstmaten waarmee de impact van psychomotorische interventies binnen de GGZ gemonitord en geëvalueerd kan worden en de samenwerking met de betrokken patiënt wordt versterkt. Aanleiding voor dit project zijn praktijkvragen van psychomotorisch therapeuten werkzaam in de GGZ. Zij geven aan behoefte te hebben aan nieuwe kennis en meetinstrumenten waarmee ze: 1. het behandelresultaat en de toenemende vraag naar evidentie van psychomotorische therapie (PMT) )vast kunnen stellen; 2. het beloop van de behandeling kunnen monitoren en bespreekbaar kunnen maken met de betrokken patiënt. Op basis van de beschikbare literatuur over behandelevaluaties werd de volgende onderzoeksvraag geformuleerd: ‘Hoe kunnen Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) voor psychomotorische therapie ontwikkeld en ingezet worden om het specifieke resultaat van psychomotorische therapie bij volwassen patiënten in de GGZ gestandaardiseerd te evalueren en wat kan de bijdrage zijn van dagboekmetingen via Experience Sampling Methods (ESM)?’. Het project richt zich op: 1. Selectie, onderzoek en onderbouwing van PMT specifieke PROMS. 2. Onderzoeken van de haalbaarheid van de inzet van ESM als evaluatiemethode binnen de PMT. 3. De ontwikkeling van een digitale portal. Beoogde resultaten zijn: • Databank van Nederlandstalige meetinstrumenten die als PROMs kunnen dienen ter evaluatie van pychomotorische interventies en die zijn opgenomen in een portal dat beschikbaar komt voor de beroepsgroep. • Handboek over het inzetten van ESM binnen PMT. • Cursussen over het gebruik van de PROMs en het gebruik van ESM.
