Studentassistenten verrichten verschillende soorten onder-wijstaken in het hoger onderwijs. Deze systematische literatuurstudiebracht het onderzoek in kaart naar hoe studentassistenten worden voor-bereid op hun inzet in het onderwijs, welke soorten onderwijs ze ver-zorgen en wat dit oplevert voor de studentassistenten en hun studenten.De studentassistenten werden vooral bij praktisch vaardigheidsonder-wijs en laboratoriumonderwijs in medische en scheikundige opleidingeningezet, en in mindere mate ook bij casusonderwijs en studievaardig-heden. Qua voorbereiding hadden ze het meeste baat bij een trainingwaar het verwachte gedrag voorgedaan wordt, waar ze kunnen oefenenen hier feedback op krijgen. Wanneer onderwijs door studentassisten-ten als aanvulling op het bestaande onderwijs wordt georganiseerd leidthet tot hogere studenttevredenheid en betere prestaties bij de studen-ten die dit aangeboden krijgen t.o.v. wie dit niet krijgt aangeboden. Deprestaties en tevredenheid van studenten die practica van studentas-sistenten versus docenten zijn vergelijkbaar. Bij de organisatie van stu-dentassistenten in het onderwijs kan geleerd worden van de twee stro-mingen die nu prevaleren: Supplementele Instructie (si-pass ) enPeerAssistedLearning(pal ). Centrale coördinatie van het opleiden van bege-leiders en studentassistenten, duidelijke complementaire functieprofie-len, inzet bij praktische vakken, en inbedding binnen de opleidingen opbasis van passende leeruitkomsten kunnen bijdragen aan duurzame bor-ging.Students perform various types of educational tasks in higher education as teaching assistants. This systematic literature review mapped out the research on how teaching assistants are prepared for their tasks,what types of instruction they provide, and what this yields for both teaching assistants and students. The teaching assistants were primarily deployed in practical skills education and laboratory education in medical and chemistry programs, and to a lesser extent also in case-based education and metacognitive education. In terms of preparation, they benefited most from training that demonstrates expected behaviour, provides opportunities for practice, and offers feedback. The deployment of teaching assistants in education, as a supplement to regular instruction, resulted in higher student satisfaction and better performance. Regarding practical sessions, students taught by teaching assistants did not perform differently or express less satisfaction than those taught by teachers. In organizing student assistants in education, lessons can be learned from the two prevailing approaches: SI-PASS and PAL. Both central coordination with clear complementary job profiles for student assistants or integration within programs based on appropriate learning outcomes can contribute to sustainable implementation.
Peer discussions play a major role in students’ collaborative problem-solving activity. These discussions provide researchers and teachers with a wealth of information about the students' reasoning. To analyse such discussions, different theoretical lenses are available, such as Schoenfeld’s problem solving model, the Florida Taxonomy of Cognitive Behaviour, and the Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis. The question is, however, how these three perspectives can complement each other. To investigate this, the discussion between four students was analysed through the three lenses. Results indicate that these frameworks are both complementary and connected. This connection allows an in-depth analysis of the discussion and reveals possibilities and limitations for an integration of the three models, which will guide future discussions’ analyses in our study.
From the article: "Whilst the importance of online peer feedback and writing argumentative essays for students in higher education is unquestionable, there is a need for further research into whether and the extent to which female and male students differ with regard to their argumentative feedback, essay writing, and content learning in online settings. The current study used a pre-test, post-test design to explore the extent to which female and male students differ regarding their argumentative feedback quality, essay writing and content learning in an online environment. Participants were 201 BSc biotechnology students who wrote an argumentative essay, engaged in argumentative peer feedback with learning partners in the form of triads and finally revised their original argumentative essay. The findings revealed differences between females and males in terms of the quality of their argumentative feedback. Female students provided higher-quality argumentative feedback than male students. Although all students improved their argumentative essay quality and also knowledge content from pre-test to post-test, these improvements were not significantly different between females and males. Explanations for these findings and recommendations are provided"
MULTIFILE
