Athletes who wish to resume high-level activities after an injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are often advised to undergo surgical reconstruction. Nevertheless, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) does not equate to normal function of the knee or reduced risk of subsequent injuries. In fact, recent evidence has shown that only around half of post-ACLR patients can expect to return to competitive level of sports. A rising concern is the high rate of second ACL injuries, particularly in young athletes, with up to 20% of those returning to sport in the first year from surgery experiencing a second ACL rupture. Aside from the increased risk of second injury, patients after ACLR have an increased risk of developing early onset of osteoarthritis. Given the recent findings, it is imperative that rehabilitation after ACLR is scrutinized so the second injury preventative strategies can be optimized. Unfortunately, current ACLR rehabilitation programs may not be optimally effective in addressing deficits related to the initial injury and the subsequent surgical intervention. Motor learning to (re-)acquire motor skills and neuroplastic capacities are not sufficiently incorporated during traditional rehabilitation, attesting to the high re-injury rates. The purpose of this article is to present novel clinically integrated motor learning principles to support neuroplasticity that can improve patient functional performance and reduce the risk of second ACL injury. The following key concepts to enhance rehabilitation and prepare the patient for re-integration to sports after an ACL injury that is as safe as possible are presented: (1) external focus of attention, (2) implicit learning, (3) differential learning, (4) self-controlled learning and contextual interference. The novel motor learning principles presented in this manuscript may optimize future rehabilitation programs to reduce second ACL injury risk and early development of osteoarthritis by targeting changes in neural networks.
LINK
Failure is a popular topic of research. It has long been a source of study in fields such as sociology and anthropology, science and technology studies, privacy and surveillance, cultural, feminist and media studies, art, theatre, film, and political science. When things go awry, breakdown, or rupture they lead to valuable insights into the mundane mechanisms of social worlds. Yet, while failure is a familiar topic of research, failure in and as a tactic of research is far less visible, valued, and explored.In this book the authors reflect upon the role of creative interventions as a critical mode for methods, research techniques, fieldwork, and knowledge transmission or impact. Here, failure is considered a productive part of engaging with and in the field. It is about acknowledging the ‘mess’ of the social and how we need methods, modes of attunement, and knowledge translation that address this complexity in nuanced ways. In this collection, interdisciplinary researchers and practitioners share their practices, insights, and challenges around rethinking failure beyond normalized tropes. What does failure mean? What does it do? What does putting failure under the microscope do to our assumptions around ontology and epistemologies? How can it be deployed to challenge norms in a time of great uncertainty, crisis, and anxiety? And what are some of the ways resilience and failure are interrelated?
MULTIFILE
After the violent disintegration of Yugoslavia, a flourishing cultural scene was established in Croatia’s capital Zagreb. The scene calls itself: independent culture. In this book, Sepp Eckenhaussen explores the history of Zagreb’s independent culture through three questions: How were independent cultures born? To whom do they belong? And what is the independence in independent culture? The result is a genealogy, a personal travel log, a mapping of cores of criticality, a search for futurologies, and a theory of the scene.Once again, it turns out that localist perspectives have become urgent to culture. The untranslatability of the local term ‘independent culture’ makes it hard for the outsider to get a thorough understanding of it. But it also makes the term into a crystal of significance and a catalyst of meaning-making towards a theory of independent culture.
MULTIFILE
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a strong rope-like tissue which connects the femur to the tibia in the knee joint. Its function is to provide structural stability to the knee while preventing unnatural forward movement of the tibia relative to the femur. Acute complete ACL ruptures during movements like knee hyperextension or sudden changes of direction (pivoting) damage two entities: the ligament itself and its nerve connections to the posterior tibial nerve (PTN). PTN innervation in the ACL is essential for: a) proprioception (e.g. perception of position and movement/acceleration experienced by the ligament), and b) stability of the knee joint. Upon ACL rupture, the orthopedic surgeon reconstructs the ACL with a graft from the hamstring, patellar or quadriceps tendon. After the surgery, the goal is to regain neuromuscular control and dynamic stabilization during rehabilitation as soon as possible for a quick return to sports and daily activities. However, surgeons are not able to reconstruct the nerve gap between the PTN and the grafted ligament due to the microscopic size of the innervation in the ACL. Not linking the PTN to the graft creates a disconnection between the knee joint and the spinal cord. To mitigate these disadvantages in ACL surgery, this study focuses on activating the growth of proprioception nerve endings using a ligament loaded with growth factors (neurotrophins). We hypothesize that neurotrophins will activate proprioceptive fibers of neurons close to the ACL. We describe graft fabrication steps and in vitro experiments to expand on the regeneration capacity of a commercially available ACL-like synthetic ligament called LARS. The results will bring the ACL regeneration field closer to having a graft that can aid patients in regaining mobility and stability during locomotion and running, confidence in the strength of the knee joint, and quick return to sports.
Bij veel (sport)blessures en orthopedische aandoeningen, zoals voorste kruisband (VKB-) rupturen en enkelfracturen, moeten patiënten na een operatieve ingreep een lang revalidatietraject ondergaan. Fysiotherapeuten, (mentale) coaches, inspanningsfysiologen en orthopedisch chirurgen constateren dat patiënten ondanks goede begeleiding veelal hun fysieke niveau van voor de blessure niet meer bereiken. Om kwalitatief betere zorg te kunnen bieden, willen deze professionals meer inzicht krijgen in het individuele herstel. Door een combinatie van lichamelijke en psychologische parameters intensief te monitoren, denken zij namelijk eerder de therapie aan te kunnen passen op (on)gewenste veranderingen in het beloop van herstel. De zorgprofessionals hebben echter onvoldoende tijd en mogelijkheden om patiënten intensief te monitoren. Bovendien denken zij het herstel verder te kunnen ondersteunen door patiënten zelf te laten meten omdat patiënten meer verantwoordelijkheid voor hun gezondheid nemen indien zij toegang krijgen tot hun eigen data. De zorgprofessionals vragen zich daarom af hoe zij een zelf-monitoringsysteem voor orthopedische patiënten kunnen inrichten, dat hen in staat stelt therapie op maat te geven gedurende het totale revalidatieproces (casus VKB-reconstructies). Centrale onderzoeksvraag is: Welke kennis en vaardigheden hebben zorgprofessionals en patiënten na een VKB-reconstructie nodig om een zelf-monitoringsysteem slim toe te kunnen passen in de zorgpraktijk? Deze onderzoeksvraag kent de volgende deelvragen: A. Hoe moet een zelf-monitoringsysteem volgens zorgprofessionals, technici/ontwerpers en patiënten worden ingericht en gebruikers getraind om de patiënten na een VKB-reconstructie in staat te stellen een kernset van lichamelijke en psychologische parameters zelfstandig te verzamelen en te delen? B. Hoe wordt het zelf-monitoringsysteem door zorgprofessionals en patiënten na een VKB-reconstructie in de praktijk gebruikt en hoe staat het gebruik in relatie tot herstel? C. Wat zijn de ervaringen van zowel de zorgprofessionals als patiënten na een VKB-reconstructie met het zelf-monitoringsysteem en wat zijn de belemmerende en/of bevorderende factoren bij het gebruik van het zelf-monitoringsysteem voor het revalidatietraject?