Full text via link. Project objectives Radicalisation research leads to ethical and legal questions and issues. These issues need to be addressed in way that helps the project progress in ethically and legally acceptable manner. Description of Work The legal analysis in SAFIRE addressed questions such as which behaviour associated with radicalisation is criminal behaviour. The ethical issues were addressed throughout the project in close cooperation between the ethicists and the researchers using a method called ethical parallel research. Results A legal analysis was made about criminal law and radicalisation. During the project lively discussionswere held in the research team about ethical issues. An ethical justification for interventions in radicalisation processes has been written. With regard to research ethics: An indirect informed consent procedure for interviews with (former) radicals has been designed. Practical guidelines to prevent obtaining information that could lead to indirect identification of respondents were developed.
LINK
Interview met Anke van Gorp. Bij radicalisering denkt iedereen momenteel aan jonge moslims die als jihadist naar Syrië en Irak trekken. Zo vroeg en zo hard mogelijk aanpakken, is de publieke opinie. Europees onderzoek komt tot een heel andere conclusie. Mede-onderzoeker Anke van Gorp van het HU-lectoraat Regie van Veiligheid: ‘Radicalisering hoort ook bij identiteitsvorming.’
LINK
Full text via link. It became clear early on in the SAFIRE project that different EU countries have different views on targeting groups in social work and especially with regard to preventing or countering radicalization. Consequently, a programme developed in one country to prevent radicalization cannot necessarily be used in another country, because targeting a specific group may not be allowed.
LINK
