Within European cross-border health care, recent studies have identified several types of international patients. Within the Anglo-Saxon setting, the specific terminology of medical tourism is used. The analytical purpose of the paper is to resolve this semantic difference by suggesting an alternative terminology, 'transnational health care' that is understood as a 'context-controlled and coordinated network of health services'. For demand-driven trans-border access seekers and cross-border access searchers, there is a need to opt for regional health-policy strategies. For supply-driven sending context actors and receiving context actors, there would be organizational benefits to these strategies.Applying the terminology of trans-border access seekers, cross-border access searchers, sending context and receiving context actors results in a transnational patient mobility typology of twelve types of international patients, based on the criteria of geographical distance, cultural distance and searching efforts, public/private/no cover and private/public provision of health services. Finally, the normative purpose of the paper is to encourage the use of this terminology to promote a policy route for transnational health regions. It is suggested that the development of transnational health regions, each with their own medical and supportive service characteristics, could enhance governmental context-controlled decision power in applying sustainable health destination management.
LINK
Key summary points Aim To reach consensus on terminology, organisational aspects, and outcome domains of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home. Findings In three rounds, an international panel reached a consensus regarding the term “home-based geriatric rehabilitation” to distinguish it from inpatient rehabilitation. The panel also identifed key organisational aspects essential for its implementation and concluded that participation and activity are the primary outcome domains to focus on. Message The results of this International Delphi shows consensus of experts on various topics in home-based GR, which is important to further develop international collaboration, development and research on this topic. Abstract Purpose Internationally, many diferences are observed regarding the practice of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home. To improve international collaboration and research on this topic, we aimed to reach a consensus on terminology, organisational aspects, and outcome domains to focus on. Methods We conducted a three-round online Delphi study among 60 (Home-based) geriatric rehabilitation experts from 14 countries. In the frst round, we collected diverse perspectives and input through statements and questions. In the subsequent rounds, participants rated statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Each statement could be accompanied by written feedback. After each round, results were presented anonymously to the participants, and statements on which no consensus was reached were rephrased. Consensus was defned as 70% or more participants (fully) agreeing with a statement. Results Sixty, 52, and 46 experts completed rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. After two rounds, we reached a consensus on ten statements and on the remaining four in the last round. A consensus was reached on the terminology used (i.e., home-based geriatric rehabilitation) and on several organisational aspects (e.g., essential aspects to consider for starting home-based geriatric rehabilitation and the importance of a knowledgeable case manager). Lastly, experts agreed that participation and activity are the most important outcome domains to focus on. Conclusions Through an international Delphi study, we reached consensus on various important aspects of home-based geriatric rehabilitation. These outcomes provide a basis for further development of this emerging feld.
DOCUMENT
Background: Nursing documentation could improve the quality of nursing care by being an important source of information about patients' needs and nursing interventions. Standardized terminologies (e.g. NANDA International and the Omaha System) are expected to enhance the accuracy of nursing documentation. However, it remains unclear whether nursing staff actually feel supported in providing nursing care by the use of electronic health records that include standardized terminologies.Objectives: a. To explore which standardized terminologies are being used by nursing staff in electronic health records. b. To explore to what extent they feel supported by the use of electronic health records. c. To examine whether the extent to which nursing staff feel supported is associated with the standardized terminologies that they use in electronic health records.Design: Cross-sectional survey design.Setting and participants: A representative sample of 667 Dutch registered nurses and certified nursing assistants working with electronic health records. The respondents were working in hospitals, mental health care, home care or nursing homes.Methods: A web-based questionnaire was used. Descriptive statistics were performed to explore which standardized terminologies were used by nursing staff, and to explore the extent to which nursing staff felt supported by the use of electronic health records. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the association between the extent of the perceived support provided by electronic health records and the use of specific standardized terminologies.Results: Only half of the respondents used standardized terminologies in their electronic health records. In general, nursing staff felt most supported by the use of electronic health records in their nursing activities during the provision of care. Nursing staff were often not positive about whether the nursing information in the electronic health records was complete, relevant and accurate, and whether the electronic health records were user-friendly. No association was found between the extent to which nursing staff felt supported by the electronic health records and the use of specific standardized terminologies.Conclusions: More user-friendly designs for electronic health records should be developed. The poor user-friendliness of electronic health records and the variety of ways in which software developers have integrated standardized terminologies might explain why these terminologies had less of an impact on the extent to which nursing staff felt supported by the use of electronic health records.
LINK
PurposeInternationally, many differences are observed regarding the practice of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home. To improve international collaboration and research on this topic, we aimed to reach a consensus on terminology, organisational aspects, and outcome domains to focus on.MethodsWe conducted a three-round online Delphi study among 60 (Home-based) geriatric rehabilitation experts from 14 countries. In the first round, we collected diverse perspectives and input through statements and questions. In the subsequent rounds, participants rated statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Each statement could be accompanied by written feedback. After each round, results were presented anonymously to the participants, and statements on which no consensus was reached were rephrased. Consensus was defined as 70% or more participants (fully) agreeing with a statement.ResultsSixty, 52, and 46 experts completed rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. After two rounds, we reached a consensus on ten statements and on the remaining four in the last round. A consensus was reached on the terminology used (i.e., home-based geriatric rehabilitation) and on several organisational aspects (e.g., essential aspects to consider for starting home-based geriatric rehabilitation and the importance of a knowledgeable case manager). Lastly, experts agreed that participation and activity are the most important outcome domains to focus on.ConclusionsThrough an international Delphi study, we reached consensus on various important aspects of home-based geriatric rehabilitation. These outcomes provide a basis for further development of this emerging field.
MULTIFILE
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dietetic interventions contribute to certain health objectives and other outcomes, but are mostly part of a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach what makes evaluating the actual effects of dietitians' involvement rather complex. Although monitoring and outcome evaluation (M&OE) can provide routine data to prove the effectiveness of dietetic interventions, this has not been established yet in different dietetic settings.METHODS: A comprehensive framework for M&OE in dietetics was developed by dietetic experts from five European higher education institutes for dietetics in the course of the EU sponsored project "Improvement of Education and Competences in Dietetics (IMPECD)".RESULTS: Firstly, clear definitions on M&OE are proposed to facilitate the use of consistent terminology, with a specific emphasis on the term "impact" covering macro-level outcomes such as cost-effectiveness. Secondly, the Dietetic Care Process (DCP) was merged into a logic model to demonstrate the position of M&OE in relation to intervention planning and implementation, in both group and individual settings. Thirdly, selecting the appropriate indicators is indispensable to monitor and evaluate outcomes, and requires a high level of dietitians' critical reasoning. A categorized overview of indicators is provided to support this process. Lastly, the consortium developed a checklist to give dietitians a handle on what elements could be included in their M&OE plan and trigger them to perform M&OE in practice.CONCLUSIONS: Innovative M&OE models may help dietitians to demonstrate their effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes and justify their role in health care.
DOCUMENT
Uitgaande van de verschillende relaties van opleiders en begeleiders van leraren ten opzichte van nieuwe leraren die zij op de werkplek ondersteunen, wordt in deze bijdrage een onderscheid gemaakt in drie verschillende ‘typen’ lerarenopleiders en de uiteenlopende benamingen daarvoor. Daarbij wordt tevens de vraag beantwoordt welke kennisbases en beroepsstandaarden voor deze drie typen lerarenopleiders van belang zijn..
DOCUMENT
The past two years I have conducted an extensive literature and tool review to answer the question: “What should software engineers learn about building production-ready machine learning systems?”. During my research I noted that because the discipline of building production-ready machine learning systems is so new, it is not so easy to get the terminology straight. People write about it from different perspectives and backgrounds and have not yet found each other to join forces. At the same time the field is moving fast and far from mature. My focus on material that is ready to be used with our bachelor level students (applied software engineers, profession-oriented education), helped me to consolidate everything I have found into a body of knowledge for building production-ready machine learning (ML) systems. In this post I will first define the discipline and introduce the terminology for AI engineering and MLOps.
LINK
Adequate distinction between malnutrition, starvation, cachexia and sarcopenia is important in clinical care. Despite the overlap in physical characteristics, differences in etiology have therapeutical and prognostic implications. We aimed to determine whether dietitians in selected European countries have ‘proper knowledge’ of malnutrition, starvation, cachexia and sarcopenia, and use terminology accordingly.
DOCUMENT
The Sport Empowers Disabled Youth 2 (SEDY2) project encourages inclusion and equal opportunities in sport for youth with a disability by raising their sports and exercise participation in inclusive settings. It was important to ensure that the authentic views, wishes and feelings of youth with a disability regarding inclusion in sport were attained. Therefore, online focus groups were conducted with youth with a disability, their parents and sport professionals in Finland, Lithuania, Portugal and The Netherlands. Seven themes regarding inclusion in sport have been identified from these interviews: having a choice, sense of belonging, everyone can participate, same rights and equality, acknowledge that everyone is unique, inclusion is an ongoing process and terminology (language) is challenging.
DOCUMENT
