Leisure travelling is known to be a contributor to visitors’ well-being and quality of life yet only little is known about the influence of tourism on the destination residents’ quality of life. Given rising imbalances and perceived conflicts of use between visitors and residents particularly in an urban context, research interest in residents’ perspectives have increased and new measures such as the tourism acceptance score have been developed to measure perceived tourism impacts over time. While tourism intensity has been proposed to be an indicator for low tourism acceptance and decreasing quality of life, little empirical evidence is existing. This study examines the relationship between tourism acceptance and perceived quality of life and the moderating role of tourism intensity. The data base used consisted of representative samples in 11 German cities. Results demonstrate a positive relationship between personal tourism acceptance and the residents’ quality of live. This relationship is moderated by the tourism intensity and is generally stronger in cities with higher tourism intensity.
LINK
How well-being changes over the course of a vacation is unclear. Particular understudied areas include the eudaimonic dimension of well-being, the comparison between eudaimonia and hedonia, and the role of activity type. Using an integrated model, two studies which combined survey and experiment were conducted to examine the change patterns of eudaimonia and hedonia, the difference of change patterns between eudaimonia and hedonia, and the moderating role of activity type. Hedonia and eudaimonia both significantly changed via a ‘first rise then fall’ change tendency over the course of a vacation. Compared to hedonia, eudaimonia has lower change intensity over the course of a vacation; eudaimonia achieved in a challenging (vs. relaxing) activity is more. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
MULTIFILE
The aim of this QSR 2022 on tourism is to make an attempt to assess available information about the tourism industry from three countries and various sources and present it in a comprehensive manner. We, thereby, describe common features of regional tourism structures, as well as differences, and we present some of the identified data incompatibilities (sections 2.2 and 2.3). The recommendations in section 3 present avenues along which data collection and monitoring can be improved, inspired by a set of key forces driving change intourism that stakeholders should be prepared for (section 2.4).
MULTIFILE
![Tourism [Wadden Sea Quality Status Report]](https://publinova-harvester-content-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/thumbnails/files/previews/pdf/20250506134122033770.20-20Wadden20Sea20Quality20Status20Report20-20Tourism-thumbnail-400x300.png)
The primary objective of the project is to identify policies for the transformation of the Norwegian tourism sector to become resilient to climate change and carbon risks; to maintain and develop its economic benefits; and to significantly reduce its emissions-intensity per unit of economic output. Collaborative partnersStiftinga Vestlandforsking, Stiftelsen Handelshoyskolen, Stat Sentralbyra, Norges Handelshoyskole, Stiftelsen Nordlandsforskning, Fjord Norge, Hurtigruten, Neroyfjorden Verdsarvpark, Uni Waterloo, Uni Queensland, Desinasjon Voss, Stift Geirangerfjorden Verdsarv, Hogskulen Pa Vestlandet.
