The literature on how organizations respond to institutional pressure has shown that the individual decision-makers’ interpretation of institutional pressure played an important role in developing organizational responses. However, it has paid less attention to how this interpretation ultimately contributes to their range of organizational decisions when responding to the same institutional pressure. We address this gap by interviewing board members of U.S. and Dutch hospitals involved in adopting best practices regarding board evaluation. We found four qualitatively different cognitive frames that board members relied on to interpret institutional pressure, and which shaped their organizational response. We contribute to the literature on organizational response to institutional pressure by empirically investigating how decision-makers interpret institutional pressure, by suggesting prior experience and role definition as moderating factors of multidimensional cognitive frames, and by showing how these cognitive frames influence board members’ response to the same institutional pressure.
DOCUMENT
from the article: Abstract Based on a review of recent literature, this paper addresses the question of how urban planners can steer urban environmental quality, given the fact that it is multidimensional in character, is assessed largely in subjective terms and varies across time. The paper explores three questions that are at the core of planning and designing cities: ‘quality of what?’, ‘quality for whom?’ and ‘quality at what time?’ and illustrates the dilemmas that urban planners face in answering these questions. The three questions provide a novel framework that offers urban planners perspectives for action in finding their way out of the dilemmas identified. Rather than further detailing the exact nature of urban quality, these perspectives call for an approach to urban planning that is integrated, participative and adaptive. ; ; sustainable urban development; trade-offs; quality dimensions
DOCUMENT
Purpose: The authors provide a personal insight into how they see the potential of urban culture as a vehicle for creative placemaking. The purpose of this study is to highlight the opportunities for the tourism industry to embrace this global youth culture now that one of its pillars, breakdance, is on the brink of becoming an Olympic discipline in 2024, thus nudging this youth culture from underground to mainstream. Design/methodology/approach: The authors interviewed two Dutch pioneers in the field of urban culture: Tyrone van der Meer, founder of The Notorious IBE (IBE), an international breaking event, and Angelo Martinus, founder of the urban scene in Eindhoven and initiator of EMOVES, an urban culture and sports event. Findings: The authors illustrate the added value of urban culture to creative placemaking by addressing the initiatives of previously mentioned Dutch pioneers. Their urban culture events on Dutch soil, yearly attract thousands of participants and visitors from the urban scene, covering over 40 nationalities, to the South of The Netherlands. Originality/value: This study provides a glimpse into a global youth culture that is primarily invisible to the tourism industry and a foresight in how the tourism industry and other stakeholders (e.g. policy makers, city marketeers, tourism managers and event organisers) can pick up on this evolving trend. The study is meant as a wake-up call.
MULTIFILE
It is predicted that 5 million rural jobs will have disappeared before 2016. These changes do notonly concern farmers. In their decline all food chain related SMEs will be affected severely. Newbusiness opportunities can be found in short food supply chains. However, they can onlysucceed if handled professionally and on a proper scale. This presents opportunities on 4interconnected strands:Collect market relevant regional dataDevelop innovative specialisation strategies for SMEsForge new forms of regional cooperation and partnership based on common benefits andshared values.Acquire specific skillsREFRAME takes up these challenges. In a living lab of 5 regional pilots, partners willdemonstrate the Regional Food Frame (RFF) as an effective set of measures to scale up andaccommodate urban food demands and regional supplies. New data will reveal the regions’ ownstrengths and resources to match food demand and supply. REFRAME provides a supportinfrastructure for food related SMEs to develop and implement their smart specializationstrategies in food chains on the urban-rural axis. On their way towards a RFF, all pilots will use a5-step road map. A transnational learning lab will be set up in support of skill development andtraining of all stakeholders. REFRAME pools the know-how needed to set up these Regional FoodFrames in a transnational network of experts, each closely linked and footed in its own pilotregion.
