mHealth 24/7 is een dienst die diabetespatiënten helpt om op eenvoudige wijze toezicht te houden op hun eigen gezondheid. mDiabetes 24/7 is een prototype app binnen de dienst mHealth 24/7. Op dit moment kunnen patiënten met het prototype van de app hun bloedsuikerwaardes, een eetdagboek en de hoeveelheid toegediende insuline bijhouden. mHealth 24/7 heeft de wens geformuleerd om haar informatievoorziening aan diabetespatiënten verder uit te breiden, door gepersonaliseerd inzicht te geven in de oorzaak van stijgingen en dalingen van hun bloedsuikerwaarden. Meer informatie stelt de patiënt in staat om beter gemotiveerde maatregelen te nemen en stimuleert therapietrouw waarmee later complicaties kunnen worden voorkomen. Dit verbetert de kwaliteit van leven en vermindert kosten.In het project is gerealiseerd dat data uit een activity tracker en omgevingstemperatuur ingelezen wordt in de app en wordt geïntegreerd met bestaande data zoals bloedsuikerwaarde. Daarnaast kunnen patiënten handmatig aangeven hoe ze zich voelen. Patiënten krijgen daarmee inzicht in het effect van activiteit, omgevingstemperatuur en stemming op fluctuaties in bloedsuikerwaardes. In een pilot met 25 proefpersonen is de technische werking van de verrijkte app getest evenals de functionaliteit.Er is aangetoond dat de app werkt en dat voor gebruikers de verrijking van de informatie in de app met hartslag, omgevingstemperatuur en stemming van toegevoegde waarde is. Wel blijkt dat een app zoals deze foutloos en realtime moet werken en de gebruiksinterface dusdanig moet werken, dat de gebruikers er uitsluitend gemak van ondervinden. Diabetes is een arbeidsintensieve ziekte en nog meer werk is ongewenst!Als in een volgende pilot meer data kan worden verzameld, kan worden gewerkt aan het voorspellen van fluctuaties in bloedsuikerwaardes waardoor een patiënt ook voortijdig gewaarschuwd kan worden.Vanuit verschillende marktpartijen zoals ziekenhuizen en zorgverzekeraars is interesse getoond voor het project. Gezamenlijk gaan deze partijen aanspraak doen op tijdelijke financiering vanuit de “Beleidsregel Innovatie Kleinschalige Experimenten.
BACKGROUND: The time that nurses spent on documentation can be substantial and burdensome. To date it was unknown if documentation activities are related to the workload that nurses perceive. A distinction between clinical documentation and organizational documentation seems relevant. This study aims to gain insight into community nurses' views on a potential relationship between their clinical and organizational documentation activities and their perceived nursing workload.METHODS: A convergent mixed-methods design was used. A quantitative survey was completed by 195 Dutch community nurses and a further 28 community nurses participated in qualitative focus groups. For the survey an online questionnaire was used. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests, Spearman's rank correlations and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyse the survey data. Next, four qualitative focus groups were conducted in an iterative process of data collection - data analysis - more data collection, until data saturation was reached. In the qualitative analysis, the six steps of thematic analysis were followed.RESULTS: The majority of the community nurses perceived a high workload due to documentation activities. Although survey data showed that nurses estimated that they spent twice as much time on clinical documentation as on organizational documentation, the workload they perceived from these two types of documentation was comparable. Focus-group participants found organizational documentation particularly redundant. Furthermore, the survey indicated that a perceived high workload was not related to actual time spent on clinical documentation, while actual time spent on organizational documentation was related to the perceived workload. In addition, the survey showed no associations between community nurses' perceived workload and the user-friendliness of electronic health records. Yet focus-group participants did point towards the impact of limited user-friendliness on their perceived workload. Lastly, there was no association between the perceived workload and whether the nursing process was central in the electronic health records.CONCLUSIONS: Community nurses often perceive a high workload due to clinical and organizational documentation activities. Decreasing the time nurses have to spend specifically on organizational documentation and improving the user-friendliness and intercommunicability of electronic health records appear to be important ways of reducing the workload that community nurses perceive.
BACKGROUND: Patient participation in nursing documentation has several benefits like including patients' personal wishes in tailor-made care plans and facilitating shared decision-making. However, the rise of electronic health records may not automatically lead to greater patient participation in nursing documentation. This study aims to gain insight into community nurses' experiences regarding patient participation in electronic nursing documentation, and to explore the challenges nurses face and the strategies they use for dealing with challenges regarding patient participation in electronic nursing documentation.METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was used, based on the principles of reflexive thematic analysis. Nineteen community nurses working in home care and using electronic health records were recruited using purposive sampling. Interviews guided by an interview guide were conducted face-to-face or by phone in 2019. The interviews were inductively analysed in an iterative process of data collection-data analysis-more data collection until data saturation was achieved. The steps of thematic analysis were followed, namely familiarization with data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and reporting.RESULTS: Community nurses believed patient participation in nursing documentation has to be tailored to each patient. Actual participation depended on the phase of the nursing process that was being documented and was facilitated by patients' trust in the accuracy of the documentation. Nurses came across challenges in three domains: those related to electronic health records (i.e. technical problems), to work (e.g. time pressure) and to the patients (e.g. the medical condition). Because of these challenges, nurses frequently did the documentation outside the patient's home. Nurses still tried to achieve patient participation by verbally discussing patients' views on the nursing care provided and then documenting those views at a later moment.CONCLUSIONS: Although community nurses consider patient participation in electronic nursing documentation important, they perceive various challenges relating to electronic health records, work and the patients to realize patient participation. In dealing with these challenges, nurses often fall back on verbal communication about the documentation. These insights can help nurses and policy makers improve electronic health records and develop efficient strategies for improving patient participation in electronic nursing documentation.
