At the Teacher Education Institute of Fontys University of Applied Sciences, all student teachers have to do practitioner research as a part of their study programme. They are supervised in this process by teacher educators. The supervising teacher educators discuss the quality of student teacher practitioner research at several formal occasions. Some supervisors for example have recently been formally assessed as supervisors of student teacher practitioner research on the basis of an interview and a portfolio. In this portfolio they not only address their supervision skills but also reflect on the quality of student teacher practitioner research. Some supervisors also participate in a discussion group with colleagues of other Dutch Teacher Education Institutes with the intention to ascertain transcendental quality criteria. We will analyse opinions of our colleagues about the quality of student teacher practitioner research and thereby answer the following research questions:
1. What comprises ‘good’ student teacher practitioner research according to supervisors of research projects?
2. How do opinions about ‘good’ student teacher practitioner research of supervisors relate to their conceptions of the aims and nature of student teacher practitioner research?