In deze studie zijn vier scenario’s voor een aardgasvrije warmtevoorziening in de wijk Paddepoel doorgerekend: ‘all-electric’, ‘hybride’, ‘warmtenet’ en ‘waterstof’. In deze studie is een van de meest veelvoorkomende woningtypen in de wijk, een rijtjeswoning uit de jaren ’60 of ’70, als uitgangspunt genomen. Vervolgens zijn de investeringskosten, kostenbesparing, haalbaarheid, CO2-emissiereducties en kosteneffectiviteit (indicatoren) per scenario in kaart gebracht. Hierbij zijn varianten gemaakt die isolatie, zonnepanelen en subsidies wel of niet meerekenen.
Community energy can be conceptualized as a social movement, which aims to develop a sustainable, democratic, and localist energy system. Increasingly, community energy initiatives aim to develop citizen-led heating projects. District heating projects are characterized by costly investments, a substantial overhaul of local infrastructure, large installations for heat production, and require specialized technical knowledge. Based on Social Movement Theory, we developed a theoretical framework consisting of three main networks: internal, external, and material.In the Netherlands, we studied four cases of citizen-led heating projects. Our primary research question is what a citizen-led DH-project constitutes. We focus on four themes: the internal organization of the CH-project; its outreach to local citizens; the role of technical knowledge and technology choices; the changing role of municipalities in the local energy transition.We situate our findings against a broader European background. We conclude that a democratic structure, transparency of decision making, and a high level of neighborhood participation are key success factors. However, in some cases the choice for a low-cost solution led to concessions to the sustainability of the proposed solutions.
Finished
Not known
