In de geestelijke gezondheidszorg wordt in toenemende mate wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan, vooral in het kader van opleidingen. Er is onbekendheid met de regelgeving en ethiek bij beginnend onderzoekers. Zorgvuldige overwegingen - conform de richtlijnen voor good clinical practice (gcp) en medisch-ethische toetsing, worden daardoor lang niet altijd gemaakt. DOEL Beschrijven van praktische handvatten en stimuleren van het medisch-ethische denken bij patiëntgebonden onderzoek in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg. METHODE In dit artikel wordt een op de praktijkbehoefte gebaseerd overzicht van praktische handvatten en ethische overwegingen gegeven. RESULTATEN Dit artikel benadrukt dat onderzoekers reeds vóór de start van het onderzoek belangrijke afwegingen dienen te maken. Instructies daarvoor en richtlijnen voor medisch-ethische toetsing zijn te vinden in: het richtsnoer voor good clinical practice, het stroomschema van de Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (ccmo) met de bijbehorende e-learningmodule en in de basiscursus ‘Regelgeving en organisatie voor klinisch onderzoekers’(brok). Praktische tips, geïllustreerd met voorbeelden, schetsen een kader om het medisch-ethisch denken te stimuleren. Tot slot is het van belang om de organisatorische inbedding van onderzoek in het kader van opleidingen te verbeteren. CONCLUSIE Basisinformatie over gcp en medisch-ethische toetsing bij patiëntgebonden onderzoek is via diverse kanalen beschikbaar. De uitdaging zit vooral in de inbedding van gcp in patiëntgebonden onderzoek door beginnend onderzoekers in de ggz.
DOCUMENT
We read the invited review on sustainable medicines use in clinicalpractice by Adeyeye et al.1and would like to congratulate the authorswith the captivating way in which they used scientific facts combinedwith very practical solutions to convey their call to action. This call isprimarily addressed to the NHS, which the authors suspect will reso-nate with other health systems. While we fully agree with necessityof this top-down approach, we additionally believe that there is muchto be gained by making future prescribers more knowledgeable andaware about the impact they have on planetary health. The articleremains very brief about next generation of healthcare professionalsby quoting the General Medical Council's statement that“newly quali-fied doctors must be able to apply the principles, methods and knowl-edge of population health and the improvement of health andsustainable healthcare to medical practice.”2However, the underlyingquestion—how we effectively train future healthcare professionals inthese attitudes underpinned by knowledge—is not addressed...........
MULTIFILE
Praktijkonderzoek over integratie van practice based evidence en evidence based practice, nderzoeksresultaten toepassen in de praktijk,verbeteren in en door de praktijk.
DOCUMENT
Aims and objectives: To describe the process of implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in a clinical nursing setting. Background: EBP has become a major issue in nursing, it is insufficiently integrated in daily practice and its implementation is complex. Design: Participatory action research. Method: The main participants were nurses working in a lung unit of a rural hospital. A multi-method process of data collection was used during the observing, reflecting, planning and acting phases. Data were continuously gathered during a 24-month period from 2010 to 2012, and analysed using an interpretive constant comparative approach. Patients were consulted to incorporate their perspective. Results: A best-practice mode of working was prevalent on the ward. The main barriers to the implementation of EBP were that nurses had little knowledge of EBP and a rather negative attitude towards it, and that their English reading proficiency was poor. The main facilitators were that nurses wanted to deliver high-quality care and were enthusiastic and open to innovation. Implementation strategies included a tailored interactive outreach training and the development and implementation of an evidence-based discharge protocol. The academic model of EBP was adapted. Nurses worked according to the EBP discharge protocol but barely recorded their activities. Nurses favourably evaluated the participatory action research process. Conclusions: Action research provides an opportunity to empower nurses and to tailor EBP to the practice context. Applying and implementing EBP is difficult for front-line nurses with limited EBP competencies. Relevance to clinical practice: Adaptation of the academic model of EBP to a more pragmatic approach seems necessary to introduce EBP into clinical practice. The use of scientific evidence can be facilitated by using pre-appraised evidence. For clinical practice, it seems relevant to integrate scientific evidence with clinical expertise and patient values in nurses’ clinical decision making at the individual patient level.
DOCUMENT
Introduction: Given the complexity of teaching clinical reasoning to (future) healthcare professionals, the utilization of serious games has become popular for supporting clinical reasoning education. This scoping review outlines games designed to support teaching clinical reasoning in health professions education, with a specific emphasis on their alignment with the 8-step clinical reasoning cycle and the reflective practice framework, fundamental for effective learning. Methods: A scoping review using systematic searches across seven databases (PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase) was conducted. Game characteristics, technical requirements, and incorporation of clinical reasoning cycle steps were analyzed. Additional game information was obtained from the authors. Results: Nineteen unique games emerged, primarily simulation and escape room genres. Most games incorporated the following clinical reasoning steps: patient consideration (step 1), cue collection (step 2), intervention (step 6), and outcome evaluation (step 7). Processing information (step 3) and understanding the patient’s problem (step 4) were less prevalent, while goal setting (step 5) and reflection (step 8) were least integrated. Conclusion: All serious games reviewed show potential for improving clinical reasoning skills, but thoughtful alignment with learning objectives and contextual factors is vital. While this study aids health professions educators in understanding how games may support teaching of clinical reasoning, further research is needed to optimize their effective use in education. Notably, most games lack explicit incorporation of all clinical reasoning cycle steps, especially reflection, limiting its role in reflective practice. Hence, we recommend prioritizing a systematic clinical reasoning model with explicit reflective steps when using serious games for teaching clinical reasoning.
DOCUMENT
Om goede en verantwoorde zorg te kunnen bieden, streeft de paramedicus naar evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice is het zorgvuldig, expliciet en oordeelkundig gebruik van het huidige beste bewijsmateriaal en evidence om beslissingen te nemen met individuele patiënten om de zorgverlening te verbeteren. De praktijk van evidence-based practice impliceert het integreren van individuele professionele kennis van de paramedicus met de wens en voorkeur van de patiënt en het beste externe bewijsmateriaal dat vanuit systematisch onderzoek beschikbaar is. De voorkeuren, wensen en verwachtingen van de patiënt spelen bij de besluitvorming een centrale rol.
DOCUMENT
Om goede en verantwoorde zorg te kunnen bieden, streeft de paramedicus naar evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice is het zorgvuldig, expliciet en oordeelkundig gebruik van het huidige beste bewijsmateriaal en evidence om beslissingen te nemen met individuele patiënten om de zorgverlening te verbeteren. De praktijk van evidence-based practice impliceert het integreren van individuele professionele kennis van de paramedicus met de wens en voorkeur van de patiënt en het beste externe bewijsmateriaal dat vanuit systematisch onderzoek beschikbaar is. De voorkeuren, wensen en verwachtingen van de patiënt spelen bij de besluitvorming een centrale rol.
DOCUMENT
Background: The aim of this study is to validate a newly developed nurses' self-efficacy sources inventory. We test the validity of a five-dimensional model of sources of self-efficacy, which we contrast with the traditional four-dimensional model based on Bandura's theoretical concepts. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used in the development of the newly developed self-efficacy measure. Model fit was evaluated based upon commonly recommended goodness-of-fit indices, including the χ2 of the model fit, the Root Mean Square Error of approximation (RMSEA), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Results: All 22 items of the newly developed five-factor sources of self-efficacy have high factor loadings (range .40-.80). Structural equation modeling showed that a five-factor model is favoured over the four-factor model. Conclusions and implications: Results of this study show that differentiation of the vicarious experience source into a peer- and expert based source reflects better how nursing students develop self-efficacy beliefs. This has implications for clinical learning environments: a better and differentiated use of self-efficacy sources can stimulate the professional development of nursing students.
DOCUMENT
In onze opvatting van evidence beperken we ons niet tot de wetenschappelijke evidence die op basis van randomised clinical trials (RCT's) en systematic reviews tot stand komt. In het lectoraat hanteren we een holistische interpretatie van evidence-based practice. Het genereren en toetsten van alle vormen van kennis ('weten wat' en 'weten hoe') van alle stakeholders (zorgverleners, managers en zorgvragers) wordt in het lectoraat beschouwd als meer robuste evidence waarop de praktijkvoering gebaseerd kan worden. Het genereren en toetsen van 'niet empirische' kennis vraagt andere competenties dan slechts kritisch kijken naar onderzoeksverslagen. Bijvoorbeeld, reflectieve beroepsuitoefening is een belangrijke vaardigheid in het toetsen van het 'weten hoe' (professionele vakkennis).
DOCUMENT
Rationale To improve the quality of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) a practice guideline from the Dutch Royal Society for Physiotherapy (KNGF) has been developed. Guideline development A systematic literature search was performed to formulate conclusions on the efficacy of exercise-based intervention during all CR phases in patients with CHF. Evidence was graded (1–4) according the Dutch evidence-based guideline development criteria. Clinical and research recommendations Recommendations for exercise-based CR were formulated covering the following topics: mobilisation and treatment of pulmonary symptoms (if necessary) during the clinical phase, aerobic exercise, strength training (inspiratory muscle training and peripheral muscle training) and relaxation therapy during the outpatient CR phase, and adoption and monitoring training after outpatient CR. Applicability and implementation issues This guideline provides the physiotherapist with an evidence-based instrument to assist in clinical decision-making regarding patients with CHF. The implementation of the guideline in clinical practice needs further evaluation. Conclusion This guideline outlines best practice standards for physiotherapists concerning exercise-based CR in CHF patients. Research is needed on strategies to improve monitoring and follow-up of the maintenance of a physical active lifestyle after supervised CR.
DOCUMENT
In dit artikel wordt eerst beschreven wat het verschil is tussen Evidence Based Practice (EBP) en Practice Based Evidence (PBE). Vervolgens wordt ingegaan op het toepassen van EBP en PBE in de praktijk. Dit gebeurt met behulp van de begrippen normativiteit en contextualiteit. Tot slot worden, in het licht van het voorafgaande, de rollen beschreven die de professional kan innemen ten aanzien van het verbeteren en ontwikkelen van zijn handelen. Aan bod komen de 'reflective practitioner', de 'evidence based practitioner' en de 'scientist practitioner'.
DOCUMENT
