The broad field of environmental ethics, animal welfare, animal liberation, and animal rights literature indicate that all encounters between humans and animals are ethically charged. In this article, I shall examine how environmental ethics or animal welfare/rights/liberation literature translate into public media. The case study will delve into the representation of animals in the Dutch newspapers, using content analysis to provide an empirical basis for monitoring public opinion. Assuming that attitudes to animals are influenced by media coverage, the results of this case study will be brought to bear upon the discussion of the representation of animals beyond a specific national context. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
DOCUMENT
This article examines two areas of tension within environmental ethics literature and relates them to the case study of the animal representation in the Dutch media. On the one hand, there is a tension between those who propagate clear division between anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric views; on the other hand, there is a tension between the land ethics perspective and animal right proponents. This article examines the media representation of animals using content analysis, and links the findings back to the areas of tension within environmental ethics. The main findings indicate that the division between anthropocentric and ecocentric perspectives is still relevant for evaluating the human-animal relations, while the convergence of the land ethics and animal rights perspectives can be helpful in explaining why this division is relevant. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in "Environmental Processes".The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0025-7 https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
MULTIFILE
In 'Ecodemocracy in the Wild: If existing democracies were to operationalize ecocentrism and animal ethics in policy-making, what would rewilding look like?' Helen Kopnina, Simon Leadbeater, Paul Cryer, Anja Heister, and Tamara Lewis present a democratic approach to considering the interests of entities and the correlation of rights of nature within it. According to the authors , ecodemocracy's overarching potential is to establish the baseline principles that dethrone single species domination and elevate multiple living beings as stakeholders in all decision-making. They provide insights on how ecodemocracy could become manifest and what it takes to achieve mult-species justice. A unique contribution in this chapter is the notion of ecodemocracy in rewilding , exemplified bij the controversial Dutch rewilding experiment in Oostvaardersplassen. The authors discuss the complexities of decision-making in the interest of different species and the challenges that arise when implementing such politics.
MULTIFILE
The authors present a general argument for the political representation of non-humans that sits under the broad umbrella of ecocentrism but that does not rely on one specific non-anthropocentric ethical theory. As such, they hope to help move the debate towards a consensus on the need for such political representation. The argument itself has two main prongs. The first is an empirical one: It has the potential to give more effective representation of non-human interests than the alternative of simply having those interests accounted for through internalization within human needs and wishes. The second combines empirical and normative elements: It can add to the development of Earth jurisprudence by envisioning political decision-making processes that are broadly inclusive, so that the protection of non-human interests does not rely solely on legal protection in terms of, for example, tools employed during court hearings on a case-by-case basis. Two illustrative examples are presented, and the work of the the Global Ecocentric Network for Implementing Ecodemocracy (GENIE) is introduced. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
DOCUMENT
For interspecies justice, animal welfare, and animal rights, the planet needs to be divided on the basis of species' natural resource requirements. The Half-Earth View is that to maintain viable populations of the Earth's remaining species, half of landscapes and seascapes need protection from intensive economic activity. This protection is needed outside the nature preserve system, such as in agricultural areas or cities, so nature can co-exist with local communities. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
MULTIFILE
Vlees eten is niet duurzaam of diervriendelijk. Maar er helemaal mee stoppen, daar zijn nogal wat hobbels voor te nemen. Zoals vaak bij duurzaam gedrag, is er een voorlopersbeweging te zien ‘naar minder en beter’.
LINK
This article focuses on engagements with elephants in diverse contexts, inquiring why some scholars are indifferent or even actively opposed to discourses that emphasise elephant suffering. In order to address this question, this article will explore three interrelated streams within social science: one that criticises conservation as an elitist, neo-colonial enterprise; one that is preoccupied with the social construction and cultural interpretation of natural phenomenon; and a third sometimes referred to as the new conservation science that focuses on economic valuations of the benefits nature, viewing “nature is a warehouse for human use.” https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2016.1204882 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
MULTIFILE
Inleiding Het tweejarige onderzoeksproject ‘Dierzaam’ richt zich op het verleiden van consumenten om duurzaam geproduceerd vlees te kopen in plaats van regulier vlees. Vlees eten is diepgeworteld in onze eetcultuur. Het veranderen van eetpatronen naar minder en beter vlees, naar geheel geen vlees of de overstap naar kweekvlees, vraagt tijd. Om op kortere termijn een verschil te maken, zal het stimuleren van de keuze van consumenten voor duurzaam geproduceerd vlees in belangrijke mate bijdragen aan de gewenste verandering richting ‘minder en beter
DOCUMENT
In het project ’Duurzaam vlees, natuurlijk!’ werken veehouders, keurmerken, regionale en landelijke branche- en ketenorganisaties, consumentenorganisaties en WUR samen met de vier Groene Hogescholen (Aeres, HAS, Inholland, VHL) aan een roadmap voor het meten, opwaarderen en communiceren van duurzaamheid in de veehouderij vanuit een integrale benadering. De voorliggende rapportage is het resultaat van de activiteiten in Werkpakket 1: Inventarisatie van duurzaamheidskeurmerken en logo’s in de vleesproducerende sector in Nederland, met expliciete aandacht voor blinde vlekken in het meten van duurzaamheidaspecten, ontwikkelvragen m.b.t. de communicatie richting afnemers/consumenten, en het inzichtelijk maken van de spanningsvelden. Daarbij horen ook eerste aanbevelingen voor verrijking van keurmerken t.b.v. werkpakket 2, waarbij in werkpakket 2 wordt ingezoomd op methoden, toepasbaarheid en eventuele verbindingen tussen keurmerken.
DOCUMENT
