Het Kwaliteitskader Housing First is ontwikkeld om Housing First-praktijken te ondersteunen bij het versterken van hun werkwijze. Het kader helpt bij het reflecteren op hoe trouw de uitvoering is aan de kernprincipes van Housing First. Housing First is een bewezen effectieve aanpak voor de groep dakloze mensen met complexe, meervoudige problematiek. De effectiviteit van deze aanpak hangt sterk af van de mate waarin de kernprincipes worden nageleefd. Housing First werkt het beste als de kernprincipes volledig en consequent worden toegepast. Onderzoek toont aan dat de effectiviteit van Housing First afneemt zodra er wordt afgeweken van de kernprincipes. Het trouw blijven aan deze principes is daarom essentieel voor de kwaliteit en impact van de Housing First-praktijk.
DOCUMENT
Het Kwaliteitskader Housing First is ontwikkeld om Housing First-praktijken te ondersteunen bij het versterken van hun werkwijze. Het kader helpt bij het reflecteren op hoe trouw de uitvoering is aan de kernprincipes van Housing First. Housing First is een bewezen effectieve aanpak voor de groep dakloze mensen met complexe, meervoudige problematiek. De effectiviteit van deze aanpak hangt sterk af van de mate waarin de kernprincipes worden nageleefd. Housing First werkt het beste als de kernprincipes volledig en consequent worden toegepast. Onderzoek toont aan dat de effectiviteit van Housing First afneemt zodra er wordt afgeweken van de kernprincipes. Het trouw blijven aan deze principes is daarom essentieel voor de kwaliteit en impact van de Housing First-praktijk. Dit rapport betreft de korte versie.
DOCUMENT
Dit rapport is een verslag van een verkennend onderzoek naar netwerkondersteuning bij dak- en thuisloze mensen in Amsterdam en Haarlem. Dit onderzoek is onderdeel van het tweejarige onderzoeksproject ‘Social Network First?’, dat als doel heeft inzicht te krijgen of en in welke vorm de uit de ggz afkomstige Resource-methode werkt bij dak- en thuisloze mensen. Het onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd door de lectoraten Empowerment & Professionalisering van Hogeschool Inholland en Stedelijk Sociaal Werk van de Hogeschool van Amsterdam, in samenwerking met de opvangorganisaties HVO-Querido, Leger des Heils, PerMens en Cordaan. In dit rapport ligt de focus op 1) de doelen die professionals, dakloze mensen en hun naasten denken te bereiken met netwerkondersteuning, 2) wat er in hun beleving en ervaring nodig is om een steungroep op te zetten en 3) hoe professionals denken samen met de client en de steungroep de eigen regie van de client te kunnen versterken.
DOCUMENT
Hoe betrek je als professional naasten bij een cliënt die dak- en thuisloos is? Voor welke doelen zou een sterk netwerk rondom de cliënt eigenlijk goed zijn? En hoe werken professionals van verschillende organisaties en naasten dan samen ter ondersteuning van een cliënt? Welke vaardigheden en kennis heeft de professional nodig om naasten te ondersteunen? En werkt dat hetzelfde in verschillende stedelijke contexten, of zijn daarin verschillen?
DOCUMENT
Senior co-housing communities offer an in-between solution for older people who do not want to live in an institutional setting but prefer the company of their age peers. Residents of co-housing communities live in their own apartments but undertake activities together and support one another. This paper adds to the literature by scrutinizing the benefits and drawbacks of senior co-housing, with special focus on the forms and limits of social support and the implications for the experience of loneliness. Qualitative fieldwork was conducted in eight co-housing communities in the Netherlands, consisting of document analysis, interviews, focus groups, and observations. The research shows that co-housing communities offer social contacts, social control, and instrumental and emotional support. Residents set boundaries regarding the frequency and intensity of support. The provided support partly relieves residents’ adult children from caregiving duties but does not substitute formal and informal care. Due to their access to contacts and support, few residents experience social loneliness. Co-housing communities can potentially also alleviate emotional loneliness, but currently, this happens to a limited degree. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for enhancing the benefits and reducing the drawbacks of senior co-housing. Original article at MDPI; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193776
MULTIFILE
This paper presents work aimed at improved organization and performance of production in housing renovation projects. The purpose is to explore and demonstrate the potential of lean work organization and industrialized product technology to improve workflow and productive time. The research included selected case studies that have been found to implement lean work organization and industrialized product technology in an experimental setting. Adjustments to the work organization and construction technology have been implemented on site. The effects of the adjustments have been measured and were reviewed with operatives and managers. The data have been collected and analyzed, in comparison to traditional settings. Two projects were studied. The first case implied am application of lean work organization in which labor was reorganized redistributing and balancing operations among operatives of different trades. In the second case industrialized solution for prefabricated installation of prefabricated roofs. In both cases the labor productivity increased substantially compared to traditional situations. Although the limited number of cases, both situations appeared to be representative for other housing projects. This has led to conclusions extrapolated from both cases applicable to other projects, and contribution to the knowledge to improve production in construction. Vrijhoef, R. (2016). “Effects of Lean Work Organization and Industrialization on Workflow and Productive Time in Housing Renovation Projects.” In: Proc. 24 th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Construction, Boston, MA, USA, sect.2 pp. 63–72. Available at: .
MULTIFILE
The “Creating Age-friendly Communities: Housing and Technology” publication presents contemporary, innovative, and insightful narratives, debates, and frameworks based on an international collection of papers from scholars spanning the fields of gerontology, social sciences, architecture, computer science, and gerontechnology. This extensive collection of papers aims to move the narrative and debates forward in this interdisciplinary field of age-friendly cities and communities. (This book is a reprint of the Special Issue Creating Age-friendly Communities: Housing and Technology that was published in Healthcare)
MULTIFILE
![Creating age-friendly communities: Housing and technology [book]](https://publinova-harvester-content-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/thumbnails/files/previews/pdf/20250506132407955076.b97102b7-5bdc-4b75-a293-4281df36ef73-thumbnail-400x300.png)
Since the financial and administrative liberalisation from the government in the late 1980s and the 1990s, the Dutch housing associations have been very dynamic, regarding the considerable extension of both commercial and social activities, the increased reliance and dependence on market circumstances, and the large number of amalgamations, creating bigger organisations. In recent years the Dutch social housing sector is under increased pressure as a consequence of the credit crunch, increased tax levies and the national implementation in the sector of EU regulations on ‘Services of General Economic Interest’. Factors like these are likely to have an effect on the organisational strategies of housing associations, the main providers of social housing in the Netherlands. The direction and the size of these effects, however, are not well known. A recent inquiry among housing associations sheds more light on this. In this paper, we make use of a classification including a socialcommercial dimension and a dimension between so-called ‘prospectors’ and ‘defenders’. This classification proves to be an adequate tool to describe the recent developments in the sector. It is concluded that, in general, housing associations are focussing more on traditional social housing tasks and ‘defending’ strategies, implying a shift back compared to the trend in recent decades.
DOCUMENT
Population ageing has become a domain of international discussions and research throughout the spectrum of disciplines including housing, urban planning, and real estate. Older people are encouraged to continue living in their homes in their familiar environment, and this is referred to as “ageing-in-place”. Enabling one to age-in-place requires new housing arrangements that facilitate and enable older adults to live comfortably into old age, preferably with others. Innovative examples are provided from a Dutch social housing association, illustrating a new approach to environmental design that focuses more on building new communities in conjunction with the building itself, as opposed to the occupational therapeutic approaches and environmental support. Transformation projects, referred to as “Second Youth Experiments”, are conducted using the Røring method, which is based on the principles of co-creation. De Benring in Voorst, The Netherlands, is provided as a case study of an innovative transformation project. This project shows how social and technological innovations can be integrated in the retrofitting of existing real estate for older people. It leads to a flexible use of the real estate, which makes the building system- and customer preference proof. Original article at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8070089 © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI.
MULTIFILE
from the article: "In the Netherlands, housing corporations are increasingly adopting self-service technologies (SSTs) to support affairs their tenants need to arrange. The purpose of the study is to examine the customers’ motivations of using SSTs in the context of the Dutch public housing sector. An empirical investigation is presented based on a sample of 1,209 tenants. Using partial least squares (PLS), the acceptance model of Blut, Wang, and Schoefer is adopted and tested. The results show that especially the need for interaction negatively influence the adoption of SSTs by tenants. Positively, subjective norm and self-efficacy influence the adoption. Furthermore, playfulness negatively influences this adoption. Developers of SSTs should focus on its ulitalitarian function, rather then invest in its playfulness. Moreover, adoption is propelled by the encouragement of others. This can be enhanced by positive word-of mouth and should therefore stimulated."
DOCUMENT
