© 2025 SURF
DOCUMENT
Op 28 maart 2024 vond de slotbijeenkomst van het project Natuurinclusieve Gebiedsontwikkeling plaats in het Natural Pavilion te Almere. Tijdens deze bijeenkomst werden de belangrijkste bevindingen en aanbevelingen per case gepresenteerd van twee jaar onderzoek met als hoogtepunt de presentatie van de whitepaper met natuurinclusieve uitgangspunten. Naast de presentaties was er een posterexpositie georganiseerd waarbij op de posters de belangrijkste uitkomsten van diverse deelonderzoeken werden gepresenteerd. De posters van onderzoekers en studenten zijn in deze publicatie gebundeld.
DOCUMENT
In dit magazine lees je over de uitdagingen van interdisciplinair onderzoek en welke mogelijkheden er zijn om de samenwerking tussen disciplines te versterken. We geven tips voor het verbeteren van een onderzoeksopzet, vertellen over instrumenten die het samenwerkingsproces tussen verschillende disciplines verbeteren, en bediscussiëren welke methoden leiden tot interdisciplinaire onderzoeksresultaten.
DOCUMENT
Dit onderzoek is opgesplitst in verschillende deelonderzoeken. In het eerste onderzoek is permacultuur onderzocht. Dit onderzoek gaat in op de ontwerpprincipes van permacultuur. Het onderzoek legt daarna uit wat ontwerpkenmerken zijn. Vervolgens worden er voorbeelden gegeven van permacultuur principes die vertaald zijn naar ontwerpkenmerken. Tot slot wordt er beschreven hoe de principes in het ontwerp zijn toegepast.In het tweede deelonderzoek is onderzocht hoe een agrarisch bedrijf functioneert binnen de permacultuur principes. Het agrarisch bedrijf zal de motor van de wijk worden. Het bedrijf zal de wijk voorzien van voedsel en het afval zal wordt verwerkt tot energie. Het bedrijf vervult een centrale rol binnen de opzet van de wijk. Deze samenleving werkt nauw samen om voedsel te produceren en te verwerken.In het derde deel is het concept Earthship bestudeerd. Dit onderzoek heeft voornamelijk betrekking op de toepassing van materialen en technische systemen waarvan verschillende Earthships gebruik maken. Aan de hand van deze twee onderwerpen worden de Earthships geanalyseerd, vanuit het bouwkundig en architectonisch oogpunt en met de voorafgaande onderzoeken in het achterhoofd.Studentenonderzoek in het kader van het thema Duurzaam bouwen
DOCUMENT
The phenomena of urbanization and climate change interact with the growing number of older people living in cities. One of the effects of climate change is an increased riverine flooding hazard, and when floods occur this has a severe impact on human lives and comes with vast economic losses. Flood resilience management procedures should be supported by a combination of complex social and environmental vulnerability assessments. Therefore, new methodologies and tools should be developed for this purpose. One way to achieve such inclusive procedures is by incorporating a social vulnerability evaluation methodology for environmental and flood resilience assessment. These are illustrated for application in the Polish city of Wrocław. Socio-environmental vulnerability mapping, based on spatial analyses using the poverty risk index, data on the ageing population, as well as the distribution of the areas vulnerable to floods, was conducted with use of a location intelligence system combining Geographic Information System (GIS) and Business Intelligence (BI) tools. The new methodology allows for the identification of areas populated by social groups that are particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of flooding. C 2018 SETAC Original Publication: Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;14:592–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4077
MULTIFILE
SIA developed alongside EIA in the early 1970s as a mechanism to consider the social impacts of planned interventions. The early understanding tended to limit the practical application of SIA to the project level, usually within the context of regulatory frameworks, and primarily considered only the direct negative impacts. However, like other types of impact assessment, SIA has evolved over time and has diverged considerably from EIA.
MULTIFILE
SummarySocial impact assessment (SIA) developed alongside EIA in the early 1970s as a mechanism to consider the social impacts of planned interventions. The early understanding tended to limit the practical application of SIA to the project level, usually within the context of regulatory frameworks, and primarily considered only the direct negative impacts. However, like other types of impact assessment, SIA has evolved over time and has diverged considerably from EIA. Nowadays, SIA has widened its scope to become a“philosophy about development and democracy”. Ideally SIA considers the pathologies, goals, and processes of development. In this broad understanding, it now focuses on the management of all social issues, intending to bring about a more sustainable and equitable biophysical and human environment.The SIA field defines “social” very broadly, as “anything that affects people and their communities”. Thus,for example, all environmental impacts are also social impacts because people depend on the environment for their livelihoods as well as their physical and spiritual well-being. Social impact concepts include people’s way of life, their culture, community, political systems, environment, health and wellbeing, personal and property rights, and their fears and aspirations.Formerly seen as a regulatory tool required by regulatory agencies but resented by proponents, SIA, for a variety of reasons, is now increasingly being embraced by corporations and used as an internal process for managing social issues. Such a shift towards corporate acceptance, of course, does not guarantee that SIA will always be done properly, or that it is able to adequately influence company operations.Several other shifts have been observed: greater consideration of benefits; moving towards developing and implementing Social Impact Management Plans; communities themselves actively commissioning, or doing, their own SIA studies; SIA playing an important part in ensuring “free, prior and informed consent” and gaining a “sociallicense to operate”.Health issues have a central place in SIA. Many of the social impacts of projects could also be described as health impacts, and all health impacts would be regarded as social impacts in SIA. In SIA, health impacts are considered amongst a wide range of impacts on people and communities. SIA practitioners are supposed to look from an integrated perspective. Arguably, this means that the determinants of health should be addressed when SIA is carried out properly. Nevertheless, SIA guidelines do not typically require a detailed analysis of the origins of, or pathways to, specific health conditions. There is, however, a strong awareness of indirect effects and cumulative effects.In actual practice, the SIA approach used highly depends on the type of policy, plan or project being considered, as well as on the legal and cultural context, on client requirements, and on the commitment of the individual practitioner or consultancy. The SIA case studies considered in this chapter usually discussed the broader determinants of health but did not necessarily recognize them as such. The pathways from social impacts to health, and the linkages between health and social impacts, were not explicitly part of the analysis. Overall, the input of health expertise into SIAs seemed to be lacking. However, given the close connections between the HIA and SIA approaches, more cooperation and crossfertilization between these two types of impact assessment can be expected in the future.
MULTIFILE