Professional youth workers and their organizations pursue further improvement of quality and transparency in their work. Political developments require to demonstrate the added value of professional youth work to active citizenship. Due to the complex, dynamic and interactive nature of professional youth work, the body of knowledge has been poorly developed. In this paper, we will present a conceptual model for methodic acting of professional youth work. The conceptual model is based on a mixed method design of literature review, document analyses, observations, in depth interviews with youth workers (77), and questionnaires (259 with youth that participate within youth work and 270 control group). Data is collected in 8 different youth work organisations in Amsterdam, Utrecht and Zaandam in the Netherlands. The result is a conceptual model for methodic acting of professional youth work: a multi-methodic approach that consists of thirteen methodical principles. These principles guide the interactions of youth workers with young people. There are indications that the combined use of methods contributes to personal and social development of youth, social support, and youth participation. This conceptual model is a promising framework for professional youth work that allows to legitimize the profession. Because the model is based on the integration of different studies, it is needed to test this model. In the study Power of Youth Work started May 2017, we examine this model together with 100 youth workers, 1600 young people and 11 youth work providers.
There is an increasing attention for youth social work professionals to collaborate with volunteers, parents, and other professionals. Collaboration can contribute to positive outcomes for youth. The present study contributes to understanding differences in the extent to which youth social work professionals collaborate with volunteers, parents, and other professionals. The survey was conducted with Dutch professionals working in youth care (n = 112), education (n = 67), and youth work (n = 89). Index for Interdisciplinary Collaboration was used to assess interdependence in and reflection on the collaboration process. Significant differences were found in the extent to which professionals working in different fields experience interdependence and reflection on the collaboration process with different partners. Future researchers should be aware that the degree to which professionals collaborate with others might depend on the context, work field, and the collaboration partner. Youth social work professionals and local governments can use this study to identify strong and weak collaborative partnerships in order to better organize collaboration between different partners with the final aim of improving support of young people.
The relevance of professional youth work for preventionProfessional youth work is one of the social work professions. Dutch municipalities need insight into the contribution of professional youth work to prevention and reduction of youth care. In this paper we analyze data collected between 2011-2015 on the functioning and results of four classic youth work methods: ‘Group work’, ‘Detached Youth Work’, ‘Information and Advice’ and ‘Counselling Services’. The studies were explorative and have been analyzed with descriptive statistics. We conclude that the contribution of professional youth work can be: (1) to form an alternative for a significant other and/or positive peer groups in the neighborhood; (2) to strengthen the self-awareness and forethought of young people; (3) to strengthen the societal and economic participation of young people; and (4) to target institutions. Effect-research is needed to determine the actual contribution.
In line with the ‘Natuur- en milieubeleidsplan Caribisch Nederland 2020-2030 (NMBP)’ the consortium intends with this research proposal to contribute to a prosperous society with a resilient population and healthy natural environment. The Caribbean Netherlands are dealing with a situation where imported vegetables and fruits are mostly imported and hardly affordable. This leads to consuming unhealthy food and high obesities rates as a consequence. A lack of good agricultural practices with regard to water-smart and nature inclusive agriculture, as well as limited coping capacities to deal with hazards and climate change, results in very limited local production and interest. Initiatives that focused only on agrotechnological solutions for food resilient futures turned out to be ineffective due to a lack of local ownership, which jeopardizes sustainability. Moreover, the ‘green’ and ‘blue’ domains are not seen as attractive career perspectives among youth, hampering a bright future for those domains. The aim of this research is to contribute to water-smart and nature inclusive food resilience embedded in a local participatory perspective in the Caribbean Netherlands. To address the above challenges, a living lab approach is adopted, where youth will be trained as (co)-facilitators (WP1) who will contribute to a participatory envisioning process and an articulation of food resilient futures (WP2). Finally, based on the envisioning process local stakeholders will select and implement experiments for food resilient futures followed by dissemination of results among key stakeholders as well as children and youth at the BES islands (WP3). This project strategy will lead to a network of a living lab where professionals and youth work together on food resilient futures. Training manuals and the results of experiments with regard to water and food system alternatives will be used actively to encourage youth to be involved in sustainable agriculture and consumption.
Meidenwerkers menen van grote waarde te zijn voor het realiseren van de transformatiedoelen die voortvloeien uit de grootschalige stelselvoorziening in het sociale domein. Voor het werkelijk realiseren van hun ambitie hebben meidenwerkers hulp nodig. Meidenwerkers willen aan gemeenten, managers en collega-professionals kunnen laten zien wat concrete resultaten zijn van het meidenwerk voor het versterken van de eigen kracht. Daarvoor willen meidenwerkers meer weten over de werking van het meidenwerk. Ook willen meidenwerkers op specifieke onderdelen hun methodiek verbeteren. Meidenwerkers en hun organisaties door heel Nederland hebben lectoraat Youth Spot gevraagd om middels deze RAAK- Publiek aanvraag vast te stellen of en hoe het meidenwerk bijdraagt aan het versterken van de eigen kracht van meiden en op welke manier het meidenwerk beter ingezet kan worden op het gebruik van de groep, de familie en het netwerk. Consortium: In het consortium participeren de organisaties die investeren en meewerken aan de uitvoering van het project. Deze bestaat naast de Hogeschool van Amsterdam uit 9 publieke organisaties: ContourdeTwern, JoU, Dock, IJsterk, Streetcornerwork, Participe, Combiwel, Stichting Jeugd en Jongerenwerk Midden Holland en Dynamo. Deze organisaties zijn aanbieders van meidenwerk in grootstedelijke, stedelijke en landelijke omgevingen uit het midden, westen en zuiden van het land. Ambitie: De ambitie van meidenwerkers en hun organisaties is om met dit project aan te tonen wat de werking en het resultaat is van het meidenwerk voor het versterken van de eigen kracht van meisjes en jonge vrouwen en de methodiek meidenwerk zodanig te verbeteren dat die aansluit op hedendaagse ontwikkelingen in jeugd- en sociaal beleid. Dit opdat gemeenten blijven investeren in het meidenwerk en meisjes en jonge vrouwen in kwetsbare posities toegang houden tot ondersteuning bij het ontwikkelen van hun eigen kracht. Resultaat: Handboek: ?Kracht van meiden 2.0? waarin de met empirie onderbouwde methodiek meidenwerk beschreven staat. Nieuw ontwikkelde instrumenten worden opgenomen in de herziene methodiekbeschrijving. Ook wordt er een online platform ontworpen, waar professionals en studenten door middel van blended en sociaal leren de gelegenheid krijgen om zich de ontwikkelde kennis en instrumenten werkelijk eigen te maken. Projectplan: Het projectplan bestaat uit drie fases waarin vijf werkpakketten centraal staan. Fase 1 beslaat het onderbouwen van de methodiek (WP1), fase 2 het doorontwikkelen van de methodiek (WP 2,3 & 4) en de 3e fase kenmerkt zich door kenniscirculatie en disseminatie (WP5).
