Abstract—A survey was conducted among 20 Dutch hospitals about radiation protection for interventional fluoroscopy. This was a follow-up of a previous study in 2007 that led to several recommendations for radiation protection for interventional fluoroscopy. The results indicate that most recommendations have been followed. However, radiation-induced complications from interventional procedures are still often not recorded in the appropriate register. Furthermore, even though professionals with appropriate training in radiation protection are usually involved in interventional procedures, this often is not the case when these procedures are carried out outside the radiology department. Although this involvement is not required by Dutch law, it is recommended to have radiation protection professionals present more often at interventional procedures. Further improvements in radiation protection for interventional fluoroscopy may come from a comparison of dose-reducing practices among hospitals, the introduction of diagnostic reference levels for interventional procedures, and a more thorough form of screening and follow-up of patients
DOCUMENT
With the increasing number of proton therapy centers worldwide, particularly in Europe, proton therapy is becoming a more established treatment option. However, education and guidelines, specifically tailored to radiation therapists (RTTs) and dosimetrists, are lacking. Through the “Towards a Sustainable RTT Network” (TaSeRnet) project, efforts are underway to harmonize proton therapy practices among RTTs and dosimetrists across Europe. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize existing guidelines relevant to RTTs and dosimetrists working in proton therapy, providing a necessary first step toward the future development of specific guidelines and education for these professions. Ten articles were identified that include guidelines covering certain aspects of proton therapy workflows in several clinical indications. However, significant gaps remain regarding the specific tasks performed by RTTs and dosimetrists. In particular, no guidelines were found addressing treatment execution, a workflow typically performed by RTTs. Moreover, the limited involvement of RTTs and dosimetrists in the development of existing guidelines may result in the exclusion of essential practical knowledge and expertise. As they play a critical role in the daily delivery of proton therapy, their input is vital to ensure comprehensive and applicable guidelines. In conclusion, this review underscores the need for developing guidelines specifically for RTTs and dosimetrists in collaboration with the broader multidisciplinary team. Developing such guidelines will support the standardization of clinical practice and contribute to improved quality of care.
DOCUMENT
Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment often leads to physical and psychosocial impairments. Rehabilitation can overcome these limitations and improve quality of life. The aim of this study is to obtain an overview of rehabilitation care for HNC, and to investigate factors influencing rehabilitation provision, in Dutch HNC centers, and to some extent compare it to other countries. Methods: An online survey, covering five themes: organizational structure; rehabilitation interventions; financing; barriers and facilitators; satisfaction and future improvements, among HNC healthcare- and financial professionals of Dutch HNC centers. Results: Most centers (86%) applied some type of rehabilitation care, with variations in organizational structure. A speech language therapist, physiotherapist and dietitian were available in all centers, but other rehabilitation healthcare professionals in less than 60%. Facilitators for providing rehabilitation services included availability of a contact person, and positive attitude, motivation, and expertise of healthcare professionals. Barriers were lack of reimbursement, and patient related barriers including comorbidity, travel (time), low health literacy, limited financial capacity, and poor motivation. Conclusion: Although all HNC centers included offer rehabilitation services, there is substantial practice variation, both nationally and internationally. Factors influencing rehabilitation are related to the motivation and expertise of the treatment team, but also to reimbursement aspects and patient related factors. More research is needed to investigate the extent to which practice variation impacts individual patient outcomes and how to integrate HNC rehabilitation into routine clinical pathways.
MULTIFILE
