Background: Talking Mats is a framework developed to support communication with communication vulnerable people. Objective: The objective was twofold: to provide an overview of the objectives, target groups and settings for which Talking Mats has been used (Part 1), and an overview of empirical scientific knowledge on the use of Talking Mats (Part 2). Methods: In this scoping review scientific and grey literature was searched in PubMed, Cinahl, Psycinfo, Google, and Google Scholar. Articles that described characteristics of Talking Mats or its use were included. For Part 2, additional selection criteria were applied to focus on empirical scientific knowledge. Results: The search yielded 73 publications in Part 1, 12 of which were included in Part 2. Talking Mats was used for functional objectives (e.g. goal setting) and to improve communication and involvement. Part 2 showed that Talking Mats had positive influences on technical communication, effectiveness of conversations, and involvement and decision making in conversations. However, the level of research evidence is limited. Conclusions: Talking Mats can be used to support conversations between professionals and communication vulnerable people. More research is needed to study the views of people who are communication vulnerable and to study the effects of Talking Mats.
Background: In Europe, cardiovascular disease is one of the predominant causes of mortality and morbidity among older people over 65 years. The occurrence of cardiovascular disease can have a negative impact on the quality of life of older patients and their families and family health overall. Assuming that illness is a family affair shaped by culture and health care systems, we explored European health care practices and interventions toward families of older patients with cardiovascular disease and heart failure.Aims: This paper aimed to determine the extent, range, and variety of practices and interventions in Europe directed to families of older patients and to identify knowledge gaps.Materials & Methods: A scoping review was conducted including studies published in Medline, CINHAL, or Cochrane library between 2009 and mid-2020.Results: A total of 22 articles from 17 studies were included, showing diverse practices and interventions. The interventions targeted the family as a unit (six studies), dyads (five studies), patients alone, but assessed family members’ reactions (five studies) or the family member primarily, but assessed the reaction of the patient (one study). Target outcomes were family caregiver burden; health-related QoL; and perceived control in patients; and family functioning and changes in health behavior or knowledge in both, family members and patients. Most studies did not include an integral view of the family as the unit of care but rather had a disease-centered approach.Discussion: This scoping review provides insight into a variety of healthcarepractices towards families of older patients with cardiovascular disease in Europe. Clarifying underlying assumptions to involve families is needed. More studies with family-focused approaches as integral models could lead to practices that improve families’ well-being. Exploring integral models for their acceptance in health care and family systems appears pertinent to develop European policy to support and add to family health.
AimTo synthesize the literature on the experiences of patients, families and healthcare professionals with video calls during hospital admission. Second, to investigate facilitators and barriers of implementation of video calls in hospital wards.DesignScoping review.MethodsPubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar were searched for relevant publications in the period between 2011 and 2023. Publications were selected if they focused on experiences of patients, families or healthcare professionals with video calls between patients and their families; or between families of hospitalized patients and healthcare professionals. Quantitative and qualitative data were summarized in data charting forms.ResultsForty-three studies were included. Patients and families were satisfied with video calls as it facilitated daily communication. Family members felt more engaged and felt they could provide support to their loved ones during admission. Healthcare professionals experienced video calls as an effective way to communicate when in-person visits were not allowed. However, they felt that video calls were emotionally difficult as it was hard to provide support at distance and to use communication skills effectively. Assigning local champions and training of healthcare professionals were identified as facilitators for implementation. Technical issues and increased workload were mentioned as main barriers.ConclusionPatients, families and healthcare professionals consider video calls as a good alternative when in-person visits are not allowed. Healthcare professionals experience more hesitation towards video calls during admission, as it increases perceived workload. In addition, they are uncertain whether video calls are as effective as in-person conservations.Implications for the Clinical PracticeWhen implementing video calls in hospital wards, policymakers and healthcare professionals should select strategies that address the positive aspects of family involvement at distance and the use of digital communication skills.Patient ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
MULTIFILE
Begin 2022 heeft het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie een drietal brainstormbijeenkomsten georganiseerd met experts op het gebied van ervaringsdeskundigheid. Aan deze bijeenkomsten namen o.a. hoogleraren, onderzoekers, ervaringsdeskundige beleidsmedewerkers en zorgverzekeraar deel. Uit deze bijeenkomsten volgde de concrete opdracht om literatuuronderzoek te doen naar de evidentie van ervaringsdeskundigheid (waarde, effect en werkzame elementen).Doel Zicht krijgen op de evidentie van ervaringsdeskundigheid in diverse contexten middels een scoping review. Resultaten Overzicht over bestaande evidentie van ervaringsdeskundigheid beschreven in een publicatie. Looptijd 01 mei 2022 - 01 december 2022 Aanpak Er zal literatuuronderzoek in de vorm van een scoping review worden uitgevoerd. Samenwerking met kennispartners Movisie Lectoraat GGZ en Samenleving van het Windesheim Trimbos InBegrepen
Begin 2022 heeft het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie een drietal brainstormbijeenkomsten georganiseerd met experts op het gebied van ervaringsdeskundigheid. Aan deze bijeenkomsten namen o.a. hoogleraren, onderzoekers, ervaringsdeskundige beleidsmedewerkers en zorgverzekeraar deel. Uit deze bijeenkomsten volgde de concrete opdracht om literatuuronderzoek te doen naar de evidentie van ervaringsdeskundigheid (waarde, effect en werkzame elementen).
Al op jonge leeftijd herkennen kinderen verschillen tussen mensen, vanaf de kleuterleeftijd beginnen ze daar ook oordelen aan te koppelen. Juist daarom is het belangrijk dat kinderen op de basisschool begeleid worden in het bespreken en verkennen van verschil. Die opdracht voor scholen wordt versterkt door de recent aangescherpte wettelijke kaders voor het burgerschapsonderwijs, wat ‘kennis over’ en ‘respect voor’ een breed scala aan maatschappelijk relevante verschillen voorschrijft als leerdoel. Hoewel leerkrachten en schoolleiders dit leerdoel over het algemeen lijken te onderschrijven, is er sprake van handelingsverlegenheid mede door een gebrek aan zicht op geschikte onderwijsmethoden voor de doelgroep. Dat geldt in het bijzonder voor verschil in afkomst, levensbeschouwing en seksuele oriëntatie. Binnen dit project is het doel om op basis van wetenschappelijke literatuur een praktisch bruikbaar overzicht te ontwikkelen van onderwijsmethoden om de genoemde verschillen met leerlingen te bespreken en te verkennen. Om goed aan te kunnen sluiten bij de leeftijd en behoeften van leerlingen, zullen aan het overzicht ook methoden om de houdingen van leerlingen rondom deze verschillen in kaart te brengen worden toegevoegd. De bruikbaarheid van het ontwikkelde overzicht zal zowel op de Pabo als op twee basisscholen worden getoetst. Het project is een samenwerking tussen het Lectoraat Burgerschapsonderwijs, de Pabo, twee Amsterdamse basisscholen, Bureau Common Ground (CG) en de Universiteit Utrecht.