Background: Many intervention development projects fail to bridge the gap from basic research to clinical practice. Instead of theory-based approaches to intervention development, co-design prioritizes the end users' perspective as well as continuous collaboration between stakeholders, designers, and researchers throughout the project. This alternative approach to the development of interventions is expected to promote the adaptation to existing treatment activities and to be responsive to the requirements of end users. Objective: The first objective was to provide an overview of all activities that were employed during the course of a research project to develop a relapse prevention intervention for interdisciplinary pain treatment programs. The second objective was to examine how co-design may contribute to stakeholder involvement, generation of relevant insights and ideas, and incorporation of stakeholder input into the intervention design. Methods: We performed an embedded single case study and used the double diamond model to describe the process of intervention development. Using all available data sources, we also performed deductive content analysis to reflect on this process. Results: By critically reviewing the value and function of a co-design project with respect to idea generation, stakeholder involvement, and incorporation of stakeholder input into the intervention design, we demonstrated how co-design shaped the transition from ideas, via concepts, to a prototype for a relapse prevention intervention. Conclusions: Structural use of co-design throughout the project resulted in many different participating stakeholders and stimulating design activities. As a consequence, the majority of the components of the final prototype can be traced back to the information that stakeholders provided during the project. Although this illustrates how co-design facilitates the integration of contextual information into the intervention design, further experimental testing is required to evaluate to what extent this approach ultimately leads to improved usability as well as patient outcomes in the context of clinical practice.
While traditional crime rates are decreasing, cybercrime is on the rise. As a result, the criminal justice system is increasingly dealing with criminals committing cyber-dependent crimes. However, to date there are no effective interventions to prevent recidivism in this type of offenders. Dutch authorities have developed an intervention program, called Hack_Right. Hack_Right is an alternative criminal justice program for young first-offenders of cyber-dependent crimes. In order to prevent recidivism, this program places participants in organizations where they are taught about ethical hacking, complete (technical) assignments and reflect on their offense. In this study, we have evaluated the Hack_Right program and the pilot interventions carried out thus far. By examining the program theory (program evaluation) and implementation of the intervention (process evaluation), the study adds to the scarce literature about cybercrime interventions. During the study, two qualitative research methods have been applied: 1) document analysis and 2) interviews with intervention developers, imposers, implementers and participants. In addition to the observation that the scientific basis for linking specific criminogenic factors to cybercriminals is still fragile, the article concludes that the theoretical base and program integrity of Hack_Right need to be further developed in order to adhere to principles of effective interventions.
AbstractThis study assessed the efficacy of a co-designed, school-based intervention meant to promote physical activityand fitness among Dutch prevocational secondary students. In a two-year clustered randomized controlled trial,students’ physical activity and fitness was measured by indirect and direct methods. In the intervention group,we used the triple-I procedure, a participatory action research method, to co-design the intervention together withthe students and schools. This procedure involved focus group discussions by interviewing and imagingtechniques, followed by a co-design process to align the intervention content and implementation processes withstudents’ preferences. The study involved 22 Dutch schools, with a total of 2685 13-to-14-year-old prevocationalsecondary students. Schools were randomly assigned to either intervention (11 schools, 1446 students) or controlgroup (11 schools, 1239 students).There were no significant intervention differences between students’ overallphysical activity behavior on intervention versus control schools. However, with regards to various specificphysical fitness indicators, such as the long jump, handgrip strength, shuttle run test, and the sum of skinfolds,intervention school students performed significantly better than the control group students. Furthermore, whentaking into account student participation, i.e. the success of the co-design process, schools with higher levels ofstudent participation showed higher shuttle run scores. However, such graded effects were not similarly apparentwith regards to students’ physical fitness indicators. This study showed that co-designing a comprehensivephysical activity intervention on numerous Dutch high schools via the Triple-I Interactive Method was feasible.Moreover, results showed that certain aspects of physical fitness were improved after two years of intervention,although taken together with the lack of effects on physical activity, results were mixed.
The main objective is to write a scientific paper in a peer-reviewed Open Access journal on the results of our feasibility study on increasing physical activity in home dwelling adults with chronic stroke. We feel this is important as this article aims to close a gap in the existing literature on behavioral interventions in physical therapy practice. Though our main target audience are other researchers, we feel clinical practice and current education on patients with stroke will benefit as well.
Chronische gewrichtsaandoeningen zijn veelvoorkomende aandoeningen waarmee patiënten bij de fysiotherapeut of oefentherapeut komen. Aandoeningen zoals artrose en reuma veroorzaken problemen in het dagelijks functioneren vanwege pijn en verminderde mobiliteit. Genezing is vaak niet mogelijk, maar het bevorderen van zelfmanagement kan verergering voorkomen. Oefentherapeuten en fysiotherapeuten spelen een centrale rol in het ondersteunen van zelfmanagement bij patiënten met gewrichtsaandoeningen. De inzet van online toepassingen, waaronder mobiele applicaties, en online platforms, die gericht zijn op het bevorderen van zelfmanagement (in dit voorstel gedefinieerd als Behavioral Intervention Technologies: BITs) kunnen patiënten met chronische gewrichtsaandoeningen ondersteunen. Echter, voor veel professionals is het onduidelijk hoe BITs kunnen worden ingezet om zelfmanagement te vergroten en hoe dit gecombineerd kan worden met fysieke begeleiding. Daarom onderzoeken we in dit tweejarige project de manier waarop oefen- en fysiotherapeuten coaching op zelfmanagement via BITs kunnen vormgeven. In werkpakket 1 brengen we met een review, observaties en een concept mapping in kaart welke elementen en randvoorwaarden van BITs belangrijk zijn voor het bevorderen van zelfmanagement. Zodra we inzicht hebben in deze elementen en randvoorwaarden wordt in co-creatie met stakeholders toegewerkt naar beroepsrollen en beroepscompetenties die voorwaardelijk zijn voor het gebruik van BITs. Met de input van deze onderzoeksactiviteiten ontwikkelen we samen met de doelgroep de AmSOS methodiek die professionals helpt bij het gebruik van BITs om zelfmanagement te bevorderen bij patiënten met chronische gewrichtsaandoeningen (WP2). Om te bepalen in hoeverre de methodiek bruikbaar is in de praktijk wordt in WP3 een haalbaarheidsstudie opgezet waarbij 25 eerstelijnsfysio- en/of oefentherapiepraktijken de AmSOS methodiek gaan gebruiken in de behandeling van patiënten met chronische gewrichtsaandoeningen. Omdat gewrichtsaandoeningen een substantieel onderdeel zijn van de curricula, maar tegelijkertijd weinig aandacht wordt besteed aan technologie en zelfmanagement, ontwikkelen we in WP4 een onderwijsmodule voor scholing van studenten en praktiserende oefen- en fysiotherapeuten.
The HAS professorship Future Food Systems is performing applied research with students and external partners to transform our food system towards a more sustainable state. In this research it is not only a question of what is needed to achieve this, but also how and with whom. The governance of our food system needs rethinking to get the transformative momentum going in a democratic and constructive manner. Building on the professorship’s research agenda and involvement in the transdisciplinary NWA research project, the postdoc will explore collective ownership and inclusive participation as two key governance concepts for food system transformation. This will be done in a participatory manner, by learning from and with innovative bottom-up initiatives and practitioners from the field. By doing so, the postdoc will gain valuable practical insights that can aid to new approaches and (policy) interventions which foster a sustainable and just food system in the Netherlands and beyond. A strong connection between research and education is created via the active research involvement of students from different study programs, supervised by the postdoc (Dr. B. van Helvoirt). The acquired knowledge is embedded in education by the postdoc by incorporating it into HAS study program curricula and courses. In addition, it will contribute to the further professional development of qualitative research skills among HAS students and staff. Through scientific, policy and popular publications, participation in (inter)national conferences and meetings with experts and practitioners, the exposure and network of the postdoc and HAS in the field of food systems and governance will be expanded. This will allow for the setting up of a continuous research effort on this topic within the professorship via follow-up research with knowledge institutes, civic society groups and partners from the professional field.
