Just what and how eight experienced teachers in four coaching dyads learned during a 1-year reciprocal peer coaching trajectory was examined in the present study. The learning processes were mapped by providing a detailed description of reported learning activities, reported learning outcomes, and the relations between these two. The sequences of learning activities associated with a particular type of learning outcome were next selected, coded, and analyzed using a variety of quantitative methods. The different activity sequences undertaken by the teachers during a reciprocal peer coaching trajectory were found to trigger different aspects of their professional development.
DOCUMENT
Just what and how eight experienced teachers in four coaching dyads learned during a 1-year reciprocal peer coaching trajectory was examined in the present study. The learning processes were mapped by providing a detailed description of reported learning activities, reported learning outcomes, and the relations between these two. The sequences of learning activities associated with a particular type of learning outcome were next selected, coded, and analyzed using a variety of quantitative methods. The different activity sequences undertaken by the teachers during a reciprocal peer coaching trajectory were found to trigger different aspects of their professional development.
LINK
From the article: "Whilst the importance of online peer feedback and writing argumentative essays for students in higher education is unquestionable, there is a need for further research into whether and the extent to which female and male students differ with regard to their argumentative feedback, essay writing, and content learning in online settings. The current study used a pre-test, post-test design to explore the extent to which female and male students differ regarding their argumentative feedback quality, essay writing and content learning in an online environment. Participants were 201 BSc biotechnology students who wrote an argumentative essay, engaged in argumentative peer feedback with learning partners in the form of triads and finally revised their original argumentative essay. The findings revealed differences between females and males in terms of the quality of their argumentative feedback. Female students provided higher-quality argumentative feedback than male students. Although all students improved their argumentative essay quality and also knowledge content from pre-test to post-test, these improvements were not significantly different between females and males. Explanations for these findings and recommendations are provided"
MULTIFILE
Deze infosheet is tot stand gekomen op basis van literatuuronderzoek en gemaakt ter ondersteuning van de inrichting van de Studentsucces Centra. We schetsen een theoretisch kader voor leren door peers, bespreken enkele inrichtingsvraagstukken en reiken randvoorwaarden voor succes aan.
DOCUMENT
In the present study, the role of five categories of characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context was studied in relation to teacher learning. Both self-reports and student perceptions were used to measure teacher learning. Data were gathered on 28 secondary school teachers (14 coaching dyads). A mixed-method approach was adopted combining quantitative and qualitative data. To study the associations between five categories of characteristics of a peer coaching context (independent variable) and teacher learning (dependent variable), questionnaire results (quantitative data) and digital diaries (qualitative data) were examined. It was found that teachers learn when they are intrinsically motivated to take part in professional development programs; when they feel a certain pressure toward experimenting with new instructional methods; and when they are able to discuss their experiences within a safe, constructive, and trustworthy reciprocal peer coaching environment.
LINK
While feedback is frequently emphasized as a crucial principle of presentation courses in higher education, previous studies revealed that teachers outperform peers in terms of impact on students’ development of oral presentation competence. Further, presentation research showed that the lack of quality of peer feedback can be considered as an essential argumentation for the identified differences in effect. Follow-up field experiments demonstrated that Virtual Reality (VR) can be considered as a valuable alternative feedback source for developing public speaking skills, since this technology is able to simulate real-life presentation situations as well as to deliver feedback from the VR system to the individual learner. Recent technological developments allowed to convert quantitative information from VR systems into qualitative feedback messages that directly relate to the standards for high-quality feedback. If students are able to individually interpret the feedback messages without the intervention of a human feedback source, it could enrich the quality of feedback in peer and self-learning and further increase students’ oral presentation competence development. This chapter provides a synthesis of the literature in presentation research with the aim to construct a research agenda on computer-mediated feedback in VR for peer learning in this field. Further, two recent VR experiments in presentation research are discussed with the aim to effectively construct feedback messages in VR for improving peer learning.
LINK
Society and (higher) education have changed rapidly in recent decades. For example, since knowledge has become more volatile, life-long learning has become increasingly important. Higher education itself has been subject of change in the last decade as well. Particularly in the wake of social-constructivist theories, many institutes have transformed their learning approach to a model in which students are involved in different activities at different moments. Thus, student populations are becoming more heterogeneous. For example, they have different tutoring needs. This leads to an increasing workload for teachers. At the same time, students have changed in their expectations. A young generation of students, who grew up with ICT embedded in their daily lives, have become used to the almost instant availability of knowledge and accessibility of people through the internet. The aim of this research paper is to propose a solution for the extensive and diverse tutoring needs that have arisen in these novel societal and educational settings. Peer tutoring is indicated to be a promising replacement for teacher guidance in certain contexts. An important problem in its implementation, however, is how peers should be matched and how the tutoring itself should be organised. Instant messaging is proposed as a possible vehicle for solving these problems. Our study focuses on developing a system for automated allocated peer tutoring through instant messaging. A first version of the system was made available to two groups of students, one in distance education, the other in regular education. A selection of students participated in interviews, providing data on the feasibility and acceptance of this implementation of allocated synchronous peer tutoring. The interview data indicate that students are positive towards system-allocated peer tutoring, but that the context in which it is implemented is crucial.
DOCUMENT
Peer-coaching omvat een helpende relatie waarin twee mensen van gelijke status actief deelnemen en daarbij leren van elkaar. Binnen het hoger onderwijs wordt peer-coaching steeds vaker toegepast, waarbij studenten hun peers kunnen helpen en ondersteunen. Begrijpelijk want peer-coaching heeft bewezen positieve effecten voor zowel de coach als coachee. Bij het Studentsucces centrum (SSC), dat sinds 2020 is opgericht om de binding en het welzijn van studenten te versterken, is het bieden van ondersteuning middels peer-coaching een kernactiviteit. Binnen elk SSC zijn een of meerdere getrainde studenten actief als studentbuddy’s. In deze studie is gekeken naar de opbrengsten van de peer-to-peer begeleiding. Daarbij viel direct op dat de coaching die de buddies op dit moment bij het SSC bieden veelal van korte duur en gericht op oppervlakkige en praktische vragen en er derhalve niet echt sprake is van een coachings-traject. Daarbij blijft het aantal coaching-aanvragen laag, terwijl er bewijs is dat studenten wel ondersteuning zouden willen en nodig hebben op studie-gerelateerd en emotioneel gebied. Wat kan er volgens de studenten gedaan worden om de peer-coaching te intensiveren? Door te ontdekken hoe de studentbuddy’s en peers de coaching en alles wat daarbij komt kijken hebben ervaren, zijn waardevolle lessen geleerd worden voor de promotie en ontwikkeling van peer-to-peer begeleiding. Daartoe is er op exploratieve wijze onderzocht wat de behoeften, ervaringen en opbrengsten zijn van zowel de studentbuddy’s als de gecoachte peers. Er is onder andere gekeken naar de bekendheid van het SSC, hoe betrokken de studenten zich voelen bij het SSC, hoe tevreden de studenten zijn met het SSC en wat de peer-coaching doet met de persoonlijke en professionele ontwikkeling en het studiesucces. In totaal zijn tien student-buddy’s en zes peers geïnterviewd. Onder de geïnterviewde buddy’s is er een grote verscheidenheid aan de hoeveelheid gecoachte peers, de duur van de coaching trajecten en de inhoud ervan. De bekendheid van het SSC en met name de peer-coaching mogelijkheden die aangeboden worden, zijn als belangrijkste verbeterpunt in het licht van het relatief lage aantal coaching aanvragen, genoemd. De buddy’s zijn zelf vaak per toeval bekend geworden met het SSC en waren vaak voor hun rol als studentbuddy er nog niet bekend mee. Wel geven de meeste studentbuddy’s aan zich zeer betrokken te voelen bij het team en de peers die ze coachen, zich persoonlijk te hebben ontwikkeld en tevreden te zijn met de werkzaamheden. De buddy’s voelen zich meer zelfverzekerd, zijn sterker geworden in hun sociale vaardigheden en voelen zich meer thuis op de hogeschool. De geïnterviewde peers ontvingen individuele coaching bij plannen, motivatie vinden, studieopdrachten en wegwijs worden op de hogeschool. Alle peers gaven aan dat de peer-coaching belangrijk is en het hen helpt. Dat studentbuddy’s meer tijd hebben, makkelijker benaderbaar zijn en informeler communiceren dan bijvoorbeeld docenten en decanen, werden als voordelen genoemd. Ook de peers gaven aan dat het SSC niet heel bekend is onder de studenten. Ze gaven aan vaak doorverwezen te zijn door een docent of studieloopbaanbegeleider, of per toeval in contact zijn gekomen met een studentbuddy. De peers voelen zich zeer betrokken bij de studentbuddy, maar niet bij het SSC en zijn meestal niet bekend met andere activiteiten die het SSC aanbiedt. Tot slot geven de peers aan dat de peer-coaching heeft geholpen bij hun studievaardigheden, stressvermindering en ook meer thuis voelen op de hogeschool. In de literatuur worden voordelen van peer-coaching op de academische prestaties, het zelfvertrouwen, de motivatie bevorderen, maar ook praktische en emotionele ondersteuning beschreven. Wie zien in deze studie bij onze SSC’s dat, hoe kleinschalig of kortdurend dan ook, de peer-to-peer aanpak inderdaad deze voordelen oplevert. Gezien de aard van sommige hulpvragen, is langdurige coaching niet altijd noodzakelijk. Tevens laat deze studie zien dat het ook voordelen voor de studentbuddy’s zelf, zoals meer betrokken worden op de hogeschool en verbeterde vaardigheden, oplevert. Ondanks de behoefte aan peer-coaching en promotieactiviteiten van het SSC, weten studenten de weg naar het SSC nog niet goed te vinden. Er lijken grote verschillen te zijn in de vorm en inhoud van de peer-coaching tussen studentbuddy’s. Een duidelijkere afbakening en routekaart van hulpbronnen binnen de hogeschool, zou het SSC meer draagvlak en bekendheid binnen de organisatie kunnen opleveren. De geïnterviewde studenten gaven daarnaast als tips om vaker langs de klassen te gaan, gadgets in te zetten, de vindbaarheid online te vergroten en in de fysieke locaties te verduidelijken bij wie de student terecht kan.
DOCUMENT
The first year of study is very exciting for many students. Everything is new: the school, your schedule, the teachers, and your fellow students. How can a university ensure a smooth transition for first-year students? For this, Inholland launched the Students for Students (S4S) project in the 2019-2020 academic year. In this project, second-year students (studentcoaches) support first-year students with their studies. They do this based on their own experience and the training they receive during their year as studentcoaches. Research shows that peer-mentoring is very successful in aiding first-year students through their first year of the study program. Peer-mentoring has the potential to increase well-being, social bonding, the feeling of belonging, and student resilience. It also ensures smoother academic integration, as peer-mentoring focuses on developing academic skills as well. Additionally, a studentcoach is often a low threshold point of contact for students where they can go with questions.
DOCUMENT
A considerable amount of literature on peer coaching suggests that the professional development of teachers can be improved through experimentation, observation, reflection, the exchange of professional ideas, and shared problem-solving. Reciprocal peer coaching provides teachers with an opportunity to engage in such activities in an integrated form. Even though empirical evidence shows effects of peer coaching and teacher satisfaction about coaching, the actual individual professional development processes have not been studied extensively. This article offers a way to analyze and categorize the learning processes of teachers who take part in a reciprocal peer coaching trajectory by using the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth as an analytical tool. Learning is understood as a change in the teacher's cognition and/or behavior. The assumption underlying the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth is that change occurs in four distinct domains that encompass the teacher's professional world: the personal domain, the domain of practice, the domain of consequence and the external domain. Change in one domain does not always lead to change in another, but when changes over domains do occur, different change patterns can be described. Repeated multiple data collection methods were used to obtain a rich description of patterns of change of four experienced secondary school teachers. The data sources were: audiotapes of coaching conferences, audiotapes of semi-structured learning interviews by telephone, and digital diaries with teacher reports of learning experiences. Qualitative analysis of the three data sources resulted in two different types of patterns: including the external domain and not including the external domain. Patterns of change within a context of reciprocal peer coaching do not necessarily have to include reciprocal peer coaching activities. When, however, patterns do include the external reciprocal peer coaching domain, this is often part of a change process in which reactive activities in the domains of practice and consequence are involved as well. These patterns often demonstrate more complex processes of change.
DOCUMENT
