Zoekresultaten

Balancing restrictions and access to maternity care for women and birthing partners during the COVID-19 pandemic

1 Maternity services across Europe during the pandemic has undergone changes to limit virus transmission; however, many changes are not evidence-based. 2 Although these changes were introduced to keep women, babies and healthcare staff safe, the exclusion of companions and the separation of mothers and babies is particularly antithetical to a human rights-based approach to quality care. 3 A poll of COST Action 18211 network members showed that inconsistency in the application of restrictions was high, and there were significant deviations from the recommendations of authoritative bodies. 4 Concerns have emerged that restrictions in practice may have longer term negative impacts on mothers and their families and, in particular, may impact on the long-term health of babies. 5 When practice changes deviate from evidence-based frameworks that underpin quality care, they must be monitored, appraised and evaluated to minimise unintended iatrogenic effects.

Family care conversations & care mapping

Customised care

Physiotherapy, Dietetics and Occupational Therapy have been collaborating over recent years to develop an optimal healthcare programme for patients with Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). This case is an example of PICS symptomatology and focuses on the collaboration between Physiotherapy and Dietetics. What is PICS? Owing to healthcare improvements, more and more patients are surviving the intensive Care Unit (ICU), and recovery during and after ICU stay has been receiving more attention [1, 2]. Approximately 30% of the patients admitted to an ICU have persistent symptoms including muscle weakness, reduced walking ability, fatigue, concentration deficits, memory problems, malnutrition, sleep and mood disorders sometimes even years after discharge [3-8]. Since 2012, this combination of physical, cognitive and psychiatric manifestations and reduced quality of life after staying in an ICU has been recognised as Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) [9]. The impact of PICS is often not limited to the patient as it may also impact the mental status of the patient’s immediate family. This is known as PICS-Family (PICS-F) [10-12]. Treatment of PICS: Approximately 80% of PICS patients need primary care physiotherapy. Physiotherapists and GPs are often the only primary care professionals involved in the recovery process of these patients after hospital discharge [13, 14]. Both patients and healthcare professionals report a number of difficulties, e.g. limited transmural continuity in healthcare, coordination of multidisciplinary activities, supportive treatment guidelines and specific knowledge of pathology, treatment and prognosis. Patients report that they are not adequately supported when resuming their professional activities and that medical and allied healthcare treatments do not fully meet their needs at that time [15-18]. The REACH project: In order to improve the situation, the REACH project (REhabilitation After Critical illness and Hospital discharge) was started in Amsterdam region in the Netherlands. Within REACH, a Community of Practice – consisting of professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dieticians), those who live or have lived with the condition and researchers – has developed a transmural rehab programme. A special attribute of this programme is the integration of the concept of “positive health”. The case in this article describes the treatment of a PICS patient treated within the REACH network.

Greep op wraparound care

Wraparound care is een model voor het organiseren van integrale zorg aan gezinnen met een opeen-stapeling van problemen. Het benut hun oplossend vermogen, betrekt hun sociale netwerk en streeft hun empowerment na. Bovendien organiseert het samenwerking tussen verschillende sectoren. Ge-zinsbegeleiding en coördinatie van zorg liggen in één hand. In het kader van het programma Utrechtse Jeugd Centraal van de provincie Utrecht zijn in 2009 in de steden Utrecht en Amersfoort twee pilots wraparound care in het leven geroepen. Deze zijn vanaf de start door het Lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader van de HU met ontwikkelingsgericht handelingson-derzoek ondersteund. Daarnaast heeft zich in het najaar van 2010 een aantal initiatieven met elkaar verbonden die werken vanuit dezelfde ambities. Het gaat om de pilots wraparound care, de pilot ‘Eén kind, één plan’, ‘Talita’, een programma voor begeleid zelfstandig wonen voor tienermoeders en kwetsbare meisjes van stichting Timon, Hulp aan Huis, een samenwerkingsverband van instellingen die Intensieve Orthopedagogische Gezinsbehandeling (IOG) aanbieden, ‘Tien voor toekomst’ van het leger des Heils, Gezinscoaching’ van Vitras/CMD en Zuwe zorg, het project ‘Tussen-in’ van Al Amal, het project ‘Wisselgeld’ voor gezinnen met een Roma-achtergrond van de gemeente Nieuwegein. Sa-men met vertegenwoordigers van gemeentes en de provincie en onderzoekers en studenten van de HU vormden zij het ‘Kennisplatform Wraparound Care’ dat functioneerde als een ‘Community of Prac-tice’. Het is ondersteund met een door de provincie Utrecht gefinancierd onderzoeksprogramma

Reorganising dermatology care

Background: The substitution of healthcare is a way to control rising healthcare costs. The Primary Care Plus (PC+) intervention of the Dutch ‘Blue Care’ pioneer site aims to achieve this feat by facilitating consultations with medical specialists in the primary care setting. One of the specialties involved is dermatology. This study explores referral decisions following dermatology care in PC+ and the influence of predictive patient and consultation characteristics on this decision. Methods: This retrospective study used clinical data of patients who received dermatology care in PC+ between January 2015 and March 2017. The referral decision following PC+, (i.e., referral back to the general practitioner (GP) or referral to outpatient hospital care) was the primary outcome. Stepwise logistic regression modelling was used to describe variations in the referral decisions following PC+, with patient age and gender, number of PC+ consultations, patient diagnosis and treatment specialist as the predicting factors. Results: A total of 2952 patients visited PC+ for dermatology care. Of those patients with a registered referral, 80.2% (N = 2254) were referred back to the GP, and 19.8% (N = 558) were referred to outpatient hospital care. In the multivariable model, only the treating specialist and patient’s diagnosis independently influenced the referral decisions following PC+. Conclusion: The aim of PC+ is to reduce the number of referrals to outpatient hospital care. According to the results, the treating specialist and patient diagnosis influence referral decisions. Therefore, the results of this study can be used to discuss and improve specialist and patient profiles for PC+ to further optimise the effectiveness of the initiative.