The potential for Artificial Intelligence is widely proclaimed. Yet, in everyday educational settings the use of this technology is limited. Particularly, if we consider smart systems that actually interact with learners in a knowledgeable way and as such support the learning process. It illustrates the fact that teaching professionally is a complex challenge that is beyond the capabilities of current autonomous robots. On the other hand, dedicated forms of Artificial Intelligence can be very good at certain things. For example, computers are excellent chess players and automated route planners easily outperform humans. To deploy this potential, experts argue for a hybrid approach in which humans and smart systems collaboratively accomplish goals. How to realize this for education? What does it entail in practice? In this contribution, we investigate the idea of a hybrid approach in secondary education. As a case-study, we focus on learners acquiring systems thinking skills and our recently for this purpose developed pedagogical approach. Particularly, we discuss the kind of Artificial Intelligence that is needed in this situation, as well as which tasks the software can perform well and which tasks are better, or necessarily, left with the teacher.
DOCUMENT
Seven college lecturers and two senior support staff were interviewed during 2021 about their experiences teaching in hybrid virtual classrooms (HVC). These technology-rich learning environments allow teachers to simultaneously teach students who are in class (on campus) and students who are joining remotely (online). There were two reasons for this choice: first, ongoing experimentation from innovative teaching staff who were already using this format before the COVID-19 pandemic; secondly, as a possible solution to restrictions on classroom size imposed by the pandemic. Challenges lecturers faced include adjusting teaching practice and lesson delivery to serve students in the class and those online equally; engaging and linking the different student groups in structured and natural interactions; overcoming technical challenges regarding audio and visual equipment; suitably configuring teaching spaces and having sufficient pedagogical and technical support to manage this complex process. A set of practical suggestions is provided. Lecturers should make reasoned choices when teaching in this format since it requires continued experimentation and practice to enhance the teaching and learning opportunities. When external factors such as classroom size restrictions are the driving force, the specific type of synchronous learning activities should be carefully considered. The structure and approach to lessons needs to be rethought to optimise the affordances of the hybrid virtual and connected classroom. The complexity of using these formats, and the additional time needed to do it properly, should not be underestimated. These findings are consistent with previous literature on this subject. An ongoing dialogue with faculty, support staff and especially students should be an integral part of any further implementation in this format.
DOCUMENT
Nomination Best Research & Practice Project Award at the EAPRIL conference, Jyväskylä, Finland. Hybrid forms of learning environments in vocational education are central to the two projects of this application: a design-oriented, applied research project from the Centre for Expertise in Vocational Education (ecbo-project) and an educational innovation/practitioner-research project (hpboproject). A PhD-research project is closely related.
DOCUMENT
Community, lab, werkplaats, netwerk, systeem, multi-stakeholder leeromgeving, leerwerkplaats, hybride leeromgeving: de termen buitelen over elkaar heen. Het gaat om omgevingen waarbij betrokkenen vanuit verschillende werelden met elkaar samen werken, leren en innoveren over grenzen heen, vaak rondom een maatschappelijke opgave. Bij de HU is gekozen voor de term ‘rijke leeromgevingen’. Vanwege het samen werken, leren en innoveren over grenzen heen, vinden wij ‘grensoverstijgende leeromgevingen’ een passend concept.
Dit lectorenplatform richt zich op vakoverstijgend onderwijs op het snijvlak van kunst, wetenschap en technologie: ArtsSciences onderwijs. Het doel van het platform is dat leerlingen en studenten vanuit verschillende kennisdomeinen gestimuleerd worden om samen op zoek te gaan naar nieuwe manieren van leren en het oplossen van problemen. Om dit doel te bereiken zet het platform in op het actualiseren van leerinhouden van kunst- en bètavakken en hoe ze elkaar in onderlinge interactie kunnen versterken: van funderend tot beroepsonderwijs. Met de platformregeling II wil het platform (1) het bestaande netwerk uitbreiden om meer kritische massa te genereren voor het opzetten van activiteiten en het doen van onderzoeksaanvragen en (2) de onderzoeksagenda doorontwikkelen, om nader aan te sluiten bij de strategische onderzoeksagenda voor het HBO (met name via de NWA) en om de brede implementatie van Arts Sciences onderwijs voor te bereiden. Het platform initieert onderzoek en activiteiten, zoals de participatie in- en initiëren van- interdisciplinaire onderzoeksinitiatieven, het ontwikkelen van voorbeelden voor de ArtsSciences lespraktijk, het adviseren bij de ontwikkeling van een blauwdruk voor een ArtsSciences minor en de organisatie van (inter)nationale ArtsSciences bijeenkomsten/symposia.