Habitat fragmentation caused by urbanization and climate change are important drivers of biodiversity decline and ecosystem degradation (McKinney, 2002). Governmental inaction results in cascade effects, such as the extinction of species and the weakening of ecosystem services that citizens depend on. Alarming studies show the continuing loss of nature within European cities as they densify further to meet the demand for housing (Balikçi et al., 2022). The housing market is currently impacted negatively by economic factors and municipalities often respond by scaling back their sustainability ambitions. To avoid cosmetic greening of cities, the eco-social value of urban developments and their contribution to climate-change adaptation need to be made measurable. Developing nature-based urban areas offers opportunities to increase socio-ecological resilience (McPhearson et al., 2015; Spanjar et al., 2022).In the two-year Nature-Based Area Development study researchers at four Dutch universities collaborated with planning professionals in cities, regions and companies to investigate how nature-based urban development can become a forceful reality. The study applied a combination of methods such as co-research sessions with consortium partners, in-depth interviews with experts and a multiple case study analysis of best practices in the Netherlands and abroad. Malmö and Stockholm are frontrunners in applying innovative green planning instruments such as Green Area Factor to meet high environmental ambitions (Kruuse, 2011). These instruments were also analysed and compared with eco-city projects in the Netherlands to identify their effectiveness in fostering nature and ecosystem services.The analysis shows barriers in governance and spatiality between public and (semi-)private developments. Policy silos and ownership divisions often lead to standalone interventions that negatively impact social and ecological connectedness and projects’ potential for climate-change adaptation. Nature-based urban developments require a proactive effort to understand the precise ecological demands across scales and how they can be harnessed effectively in these complex planning processes. The results of the study provide key lessons and inspiration to enable authorities to implement more effective nature-based planning instruments.
MULTIFILE
Het lectoraat Nature-based River Management is ruim een jaar geleden van start gegaan. Lector Jantsje van Loon-Steensma richt het onderzoek vooral op de regio. 'Onze studenten komen veelal uit de regio en gaan daar ook vaak werken. Daarom vind ik het belangrijk dat het onderzoek naar natuur-gebaseerde oplossingen dichtbij is. Studenten zijn dan goed voorbereid om een bijdrage te leveren aan een groene en klimaatbestendige regio.'
MULTIFILE
Nature-based solutions (NBS) bieden veel kansen om de waterveiligheid te verhogen en tegelijkertijd natuurwaarden te versterken. In dit artikel worden zowel een aantal ecologische en juridische aspecten besproken als de consequenties van NBS in voorlanden tussen dijk en water, ten behoeve van het overstromingsrisicobeheer.
MULTIFILE
The Dutch main water systems face pressing environmental, economic and societal challenges due to climatic changes and increased human pressure. There is a growing awareness that nature-based solutions (NBS) provide cost-effective solutions that simultaneously provide environmental, social and economic benefits and help building resilience. In spite of being carefully designed and tested, many projects tend to fail along the way or never get implemented in the first place, wasting resources and undermining trust and confidence of practitioners in NBS. Why do so many projects lose momentum even after a proof of concept is delivered? Usually, failure can be attributed to a combination of eroding political will, societal opposition and economic uncertainties. While ecological and geological processes are often well understood, there is almost no understanding around societal and economic processes related to NBS. Therefore, there is an urgent need to carefully evaluate the societal, economic, and ecological impacts and to identify design principles fostering societal support and economic viability of NBS. We address these critical knowledge gaps in this research proposal, using the largest river restoration project of the Netherlands, the Border Meuse (Grensmaas), as a Living Lab. With a transdisciplinary consortium, stakeholders have a key role a recipient and provider of information, where the broader public is involved through citizen science. Our research is scientifically innovative by using mixed methods, combining novel qualitative methods (e.g. continuous participatory narrative inquiry) and quantitative methods (e.g. economic choice experiments to elicit tradeoffs and risk preferences, agent-based modeling). The ultimate aim is to create an integral learning environment (workbench) as a decision support tool for NBS. The workbench gathers data, prepares and verifies data sets, to help stakeholders (companies, government agencies, NGOs) to quantify impacts and visualize tradeoffs of decisions regarding NBS.
Restoring rivers with an integrated approach that combines water safety, nature development and gravel mining remains a challenge. Also for the Grensmaas, the most southern trajectory of the Dutch main river Maas, that crosses the border with Belgium in the south of Limburg. The first plans (“Plan Ooievaar”) were already developed in the 1980s and were highly innovative and controversial, as they were based on the idea of using nature-based solutions combined with social-economic development. Severe floodings in 1993 and 1995 came as a shock and accelerated the process to implement the associated measures. To address the multifunctionality of the river, the Grensmaas consortium was set up by public and private parties (the largest public-private partnership ever formed in the Netherlands) to have an effective, scalable and socially accepted project. However, despite the shared long term vision and the further development of plans during the process it was hard to satisfy all the goals in the long run. While stakeholders agreed on the long-term goal, the path towards that goal remains disputed and depends on the perceived status quo and urgency of the problem. Moreover, internal and external pressures and disturbances like climate change or the economic crisis influenced perception and economic conditions of stakeholders differently. In this research we will identify relevant system-processes connected to the implementation of nature-based solutions through the lens of social-ecological resilience. This knowledge will be used to co-create management plans that effectively improve the long-term resilience of the Dutch main water systems.
‘Bomentaal’ betreft de ruimtelijke samenhang tussen boomsoorten, beplantingstypen en boomstructuren, en hun specifieke locatie (stad, wijk of straat). Dit onderzoek naar de configuraties van boombeplanting in Delft is de eerste stap om een nieuwe methodiek te ontwikkelen om dit vocabulaire van boomstructuren in Nederlandse laaglandsteden te ontrafelen, als drager en handvat voor de herziening en uitbreiding van het urban forest in Nederland. Stadsbomen zijn de ruggengraat van de groene stedelijke ruimte en leveren een belangrijke bijdrage aan het omgaan met gevolgen van klimaatverandering zoals hittestress, wateroverlast, luchtkwaliteit en achteruitgang van biodiversiteit. Dit is niet los te zien van de baten voor de gezondheid, de leefbaarheid, en het versterken van de stedelijke identiteit. Dit vraagt om een evaluatie en uitbreiding van het urban forest. Omdat de uitbreiding van het urban forest plaats zal vinden in en om bestaande steden is kennis van de bomentaal van deze steden onontbeerlijk. Het onderzoeken van de bestaande bomentaal - het scheppen van een ordening en het benoemen en tonen van essentiële eigenschappen verschillende typen boomstructuren - is onontbeerlijk bij de herziening en uitbreiding ervan. Voor dit onderzoek is gekozen voor de stad Delft: een typische laaglandstad met een lange geschiedenis van stedelijke boombeplanting, en een grote transformatieopgave wat betreft uitbreiding en vernieuwing van de woningvoorraad, klimaatadaptatie, gezondheid en welzijn, leefbaarheid en het behoud van identiteit. Door de kleine schaal van Delft kan de ontsluiting van diens bomentaal derhalve als test-case dienen voor het ontwikkelen van methodes, inzichten en perspectieven voor het urban forest van het Nederlandse laagland. Het onderzoek analyseert de kenmerkende beplantingsstructuren in Delft op drie schaalniveaus (boom, boomarrangementen, groenstructuur) in diagrammatische tekeningen, beelden en tekst op basis van veldonderzoek, historische documentatie en cartografisch onderzoek. Zowel de fysiek-ruimtelijke, technische als sensorische aspecten van de bomentaal worden in kaart gebracht.
