Abstract Objective: To describe changes in the health service delivery process experienced by professionals, patients and informal caregivers during implementation of a national programme to improve quality of care of geriatric rehabilitation by improving integration of health service delivery processes. Study setting: Sixteen skilled nursing facilities. Study design: Prospective study, comparing three consecutive cohorts. Data collection: Professionals (elderly care physicians, physiotherapists and nursing staff) rated four domains of health service delivery at admission and at discharge of 1075 patients. In addition, these patients [median age 79 (Interquartile range 71–85) years, 63% females] and their informal caregivers rated their experiences on these domains 4 weeks after discharge. Principal findings: During the three consecutive cohorts, professionals reported improvement on the domain team cooperation, including assessment for intensive treatment and information transfer among professionals. Fewer improvements were reported within the domains alignment with patients’ needs, care coordination and care quality. Between the cohorts, according to patients (n = 521) and informal caregivers (n = 319) there were no changes in the four domains of health service delivery. Conclusion: This national programme resulted in small improvements in team cooperation as reported by the professionals. No effects were found on patients’ and informal caregivers’ perceptions of health service delivery.
DOCUMENT
Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment often leads to physical and psychosocial impairments. Rehabilitation can overcome these limitations and improve quality of life. The aim of this study is to obtain an overview of rehabilitation care for HNC, and to investigate factors influencing rehabilitation provision, in Dutch HNC centers, and to some extent compare it to other countries. Methods: An online survey, covering five themes: organizational structure; rehabilitation interventions; financing; barriers and facilitators; satisfaction and future improvements, among HNC healthcare- and financial professionals of Dutch HNC centers. Results: Most centers (86%) applied some type of rehabilitation care, with variations in organizational structure. A speech language therapist, physiotherapist and dietitian were available in all centers, but other rehabilitation healthcare professionals in less than 60%. Facilitators for providing rehabilitation services included availability of a contact person, and positive attitude, motivation, and expertise of healthcare professionals. Barriers were lack of reimbursement, and patient related barriers including comorbidity, travel (time), low health literacy, limited financial capacity, and poor motivation. Conclusion: Although all HNC centers included offer rehabilitation services, there is substantial practice variation, both nationally and internationally. Factors influencing rehabilitation are related to the motivation and expertise of the treatment team, but also to reimbursement aspects and patient related factors. More research is needed to investigate the extent to which practice variation impacts individual patient outcomes and how to integrate HNC rehabilitation into routine clinical pathways.
MULTIFILE
Abstract Primary healthcare professionals face an increasing number of geriatrics patients, and patient care often involves different disciplines. eHealth offers opportunities to support interprofessional collaboration (IPC). This exploratory study aimed to gain insight in 1) IPC in community-based rehabilitation, 2) facilitators and barriers for technology-based IPC and 3) technological IPC solutions envisioned by the primary healthcare professionals An focus group with six primary healthcare professionals and a design thinking session with four participants were conducted. Data analysis was based upon an IPC model. Results indicate that facilitators and barriers for IPC can be clustered in three categories: human, organization and technology, and provide some requirements to develop suitable IPC technological solutions Primary healthcare professionals recognise the urgency of working collaboratively. Current barriers are understanding each other’s professional vocabulary, engaging the older adults, and using technology within the patient’s environment. Further research is needed to integrate IPC components in a technological solution
DOCUMENT
The pressure on the European health care system is increasing considerably: more elderly people and patients with chronic diseases in need of (rehabilitation) care, a diminishing work force and health care costs continuing to rise. Several measures to counteract this are proposed, such as reduction of the length of stay in hospitals or rehabilitation centres by improving interprofessional and person-centred collaboration between health and social care professionals. Although there is a lot of attention for interprofessional education and collaborative practice (IPECP), the consortium senses a gap between competence levels of future professionals and the levels needed in rehabilitation practice. Therefore, the transfer from tertiary education to practice concerning IPECP in rehabilitation is the central theme of the project. Regional bonds between higher education institutions and rehabilitation centres will be strengthened in order to align IPECP. On the one hand we deliver a set of basic and advanced modules on functioning according to the WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and a set of (assessment) tools on interprofessional skills training. Also, applications of this theory in promising approaches, both in education and in rehabilitation practice, are regionally being piloted and adapted for use in other regions. Field visits by professionals from practice to exchange experiences is included in this work package. We aim to deliver a range of learning materials, from modules on theory to guidelines on how to set up and run a student-run interprofessional learning ward in a rehabilitation centre. All tested outputs will be published on the INPRO-website and made available to be implemented in the core curricula in tertiary education and for lifelong learning in health care practice. This will ultimately contribute to improve functioning and health outcomes and quality of life of patients in rehabilitation centres and beyond.
Longaandoeningen, zoals COPD, veroorzaken problemen in het dagelijks functioneren door een afgenomen uithoudingsvermogen, benauwdheid en (bewegings-) angst. Tijdens longrevalidatie vormen inspanningstraining en het leren omgaan met dagelijkse fysieke beperkingen (zoals benauwdheid bij inspanning) de hoeksteen van de behandeling. Het is voor patiënten moeilijk om een actieve leefstijl te behouden. Na deelname aan revalidatie gaan trainingseffecten verloren door een verminderd aanbod van trainingsprikkels (reversibiliteit). Daarnaast wordt, een jaar na de revalidatie, maar liefst 20% van de patiënten opnieuw opgenomen in het ziekenhuis met een longaanval (exacerbatie). Door de verschuiving van (dure) derdelijns naar eerstelijns zorg, hebben meer patiënten toegang tot de zorg die ze nodig hebben. Hierdoor kan verergering van klachten voorkomen worden. Naast fysieke inspanning is het voor oefen- en fysiotherapeuten belangrijk om patiënten een duurzame actieve leefstijl aan te leren en het zelfmanagement van patiënten te vergroten. Een blended beweeginterventie, om het zelfmanagement (omtrent beweging, benauwdheid en beweginsgangst) van COPD patiënten te stimuleren, zowel in de praktijk als in de thuissituatie middels een eHealth toepassing, biedt mogelijk uitkomst. Echter, missen therapeuten kennis en handvatten om blended care toe te passen in de praktijk. Het doel van dit project is om samen met fysiotherapeuten en oefentherapeuten een blended care programma in te richten voor patiënten met COPD. In werkpakket 1 inventariseren we de behoeften en belemmerende factoren van een blended beweeginterventie bij therapeuten en patiënten. Op basis van deze bevindingen worden de belangrijkste elementen van de interventie geselecteerd en wordt, in co-creatie met eindgebruikers de eerste versie van de interventie ontwikkeld (WP2). Om te bepalen wat de toegevoegde waarde van de interventie is, worden de voorlopige effectiviteit en haalbaarheid onderzocht waarbij 25 eerstelijns therapeuten de blended interventie gaan gebruiken (WP3). In WP4 worden scholingsmodules ontwikkeld voor studenten en therapeuten om kennis over zelfmanagement en technologie bij COPD te vergroten.
